JB/117/397/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/117/397/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>4 May 1811 2<lb/>Panopticon. Corrections to J.B.'s Printed Evidence before a Parliamentary Committee.</head> <!-- this page is organised in four columns --> <p>B.1. Necessity<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> King's interest &amp; power</p> <!-- all text in this column crossed through in ink --> <p><unclear>Section</unclear> proposed.</p> <p>&sect; 1. <gap/> &amp; Measures.<lb/>Connection between the choice<lb/>of the one and the other.</p> <p><del>&sect;.2. Kings constitutional</del></p> <p>&sect;.2. Power (as to both)<lb/>which by the constitution<lb/>the King <hi rend="underline">has</hi>.</p> <p>&sect;.3. Power (as to <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic>) <sic>w<hi rend="superscript">ch</hi></sic><lb/>he <hi rend="underline">have not</hi></p> <p>&sect;.4. Interest which he<lb/>has in for exercising<lb/>which by the constitution<lb/>he has not.  viz.<lb/>be as to measures.</p> <p>&sect;.5. in the shape of<lb/>patronage.</p> <p>&#9758;<lb/>In this Chapter show<lb/>only that according to<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">Constitution</hi> the King<lb/>ought to have no <gap/><lb/>power.</p> <p>From <gap/> refer to<lb/>the the Chapter in which the<lb/>the unfitness of such a<lb/>power in respect of<lb/><hi rend="underline">utility</hi> is brought to<lb/>view. viz<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> 2. Mischiefs of the<lb/>Kings being his own<lb/>Minister.</p> <p><del><sic>Ch.</sic> 2. <gap/> of the<lb/><gap/></del></p> <p><sic>Ch.</sic> 2 Common plan <gap/><lb/>on the King.<lb/>their mischievousness<lb/>(viz. they had to support<lb/>him in his prehension to<lb/>improper power</p> <p><sic>Ch.</sic> 3. Future prospects<lb/>viz. as to future Kings.</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column --> <p>Minutes<lb/>Page 56 contrition and<lb/>reformation [+]1</p> <!-- from the third column, text crossed through in ink --> <p>To Mr Chairman</p> <p><hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> Upon inspection of<lb/>the <unclear>Mr</unclear> minutes<lb/>I rather think that<lb/>after the answer <del><gap/></del><lb/>already given to a<lb/>question <del><gap/></del> so<lb/><del><gap/></del> nearly on the<lb/>same terms, <del><gap/></del><lb/>further answer was<lb/><add>not</add> insisted upon, and<lb/><del>in consequ</del> accordingly<lb/><del>consequently</del> not<lb/>given.</p> <p>If any <del>answer</del><lb/>was given, it must<lb/>I think have been<lb/>to give such effect<lb/>as the following <hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi></p> <!-- from the second column --> <p><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> In the question then<lb/>put to me the lending<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>terms seem to my humble<lb/><gap/></add> to generate<lb/>that without entering<lb/>into <del><gap/></del> <add>a</add> discussion<lb/><add>of considerable length I should</add><lb/><del>I must confess myself</del><lb/><del>unable</del> <add>not know how</add> to give <add>to it</add> any<lb/>answer more particular<lb/><del>than what I <gap/><lb/><gap/> from giving<lb/><gap/> an absence</del><lb/>than what I have<lb/><del>given already</del> <add>just been giving</add>.  In<lb/><del>my book</del> one of my<lb/><add>books there is a <gap/><lb/>that bears more or less closely on</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> this subject <del><gap/><lb/>has received a pretty ample<lb/>a <gap/> to at some<lb/>length. <add>consideration</add></del>.  See [Panopticon<lb/>Letter X. p. 55.<lb/><sic>D<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> Panopt.</sic> Part II.<lb/>&sect;.5. <hi rend="underline">Employment</hi>. pages<lb/>from 90 to 147.]</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in ink --> <p>N.B.<lb/>each reference could<lb/>have been given by<lb/>me at that time.<lb/>But if this measure<lb/>be inserted <add>there will not</add> be I suppose<lb/><del>there <gap/></del> be any objection<lb/>to the including<lb/>it in the margin, as <lb/><add>has</add><lb/><!-- continues in the third column and crossed through in ink -->has been done by other<lb/>references.  <add>As to the <gap/> matter</add> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chairman<lb/>will be pleased to<lb/>do by it what may<lb/>be seen most proper.</p> <!-- above this in the third column, an unclear note in pencil which is crossed out, then a further paragraph --> <p>If, as <add><del>I <gap/></del></add> on that occasion<lb/><del>I know</del> <add>I did, I</add> understood on<lb/><del>which of</del> <add>the present occasion</add> whether any<lb/>and what specific remedy<lb/>were in view<lb/>against these <del>da</del> supposed<lb/>dangers, I should feel<lb/>less difficulty.</p> <pb/><!-- start of the fourth column --> <p>Minutes p. 59<lb/>[<hi rend="underline">to contrast to that</hi>]</p> <p>The principle of them<lb/>had been argued against<lb/>at large in Panopticon<lb/>(Postscript Part II pages<lb/>from 90 to 147): and<lb/>I have never seen or<lb/>heard any objection to<lb/>the arguments there employed.<lb/>[&#9758; <hi rend="underline">In print</hi>.<lb/>This addition too, may<lb/>I suppose, be inserted<lb/>without the formality of<lb/><sic>stiling</sic> it such.  If not,<lb/>in this as well as the<lb/>preceding instances <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Chairman will be pleased<lb/>to insert what introductory<lb/>words may be<lb/>more proper, or if the<lb/>indulgence of inserting<lb/>it can not with propriety<lb/>be granted, strike<lb/>it out altogether J.B.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:47, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

4 May 1811 2
Panopticon. Corrections to J.B.'s Printed Evidence before a Parliamentary Committee.

B.1. Necessity
Ch. King's interest & power

Section proposed.

§ 1. & Measures.
Connection between the choice
of the one and the other.

§.2. Kings constitutional

§.2. Power (as to both)
which by the constitution
the King has.

§.3. Power (as to do) wch
he have not

§.4. Interest which he
has in for exercising
which by the constitution
he has not. viz.
be as to measures.

§.5. in the shape of
patronage.


In this Chapter show
only that according to
the Constitution the King
ought to have no
power.

From refer to
the the Chapter in which the
the unfitness of such a
power in respect of
utility is brought to
view. viz
Ch. 2. Mischiefs of the
Kings being his own
Minister.

Ch. 2. of the

Ch. 2 Common plan
on the King.
their mischievousness
(viz. they had to support
him in his prehension to
improper power

Ch. 3. Future prospects
viz. as to future Kings.


---page break---

Minutes
Page 56 contrition and
reformation [+]1

To Mr Chairman

[+]1 Upon inspection of
the Mr minutes
I rather think that
after the answer
already given to a
question so
nearly on the
same terms,
further answer was
not insisted upon, and
in consequ accordingly
consequently not
given.

If any answer
was given, it must
I think have been
to give such effect
as the following [+]2

[+]2 In the question then
put to me the lending
terms seem to my humble
to generate
that without entering
into a discussion
of considerable length I should
I must confess myself
unable not know how to give to it any
answer more particular
than what I
from giving
an absence

than what I have
given already just been giving. In
my book one of my
books there is a
that bears more or less closely on

this subject
has received a pretty ample
a to at some
length. consideration
. See [Panopticon
Letter X. p. 55.
Do Panopt. Part II.
§.5. Employment. pages
from 90 to 147.]

N.B.
each reference could
have been given by
me at that time.
But if this measure
be inserted there will not be I suppose
there be any objection
to the including
it in the margin, as
has
has been done by other
references. As to the matter Mr Chairman
will be pleased to
do by it what may
be seen most proper.

If, as I on that occasion
I know I did, I understood on
which of the present occasion whether any
and what specific remedy
were in view
against these da supposed
dangers, I should feel
less difficulty.


---page break---

Minutes p. 59
[to contrast to that]

The principle of them
had been argued against
at large in Panopticon
(Postscript Part II pages
from 90 to 147): and
I have never seen or
heard any objection to
the arguments there employed.
[☞ In print.
This addition too, may
I suppose, be inserted
without the formality of
stiling it such. If not,
in this as well as the
preceding instances Mr
Chairman will be pleased
to insert what introductory
words may be
more proper, or if the
indulgence of inserting
it can not with propriety
be granted, strike
it out altogether J.B.




Identifier: | JB/117/397/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

1811-05-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

397

Info in main headings field

panopticon corrections to jb's printed evidence before the penitentiary committee

Image

001

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1805

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

39014

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in