JB/119/046/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/119/046/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/046/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/046/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- in pencil --><p>Battersea Rise 17 <note><sic>Panopt.</sic> Bill<lb/><sic>Prefat</sic></note></p> <!-- this page is organised in four columns --><head>Reasons for <sic>adher<hi rend="superscript">g</hi></sic><lb/>to the old choice<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
of Battersea<lb/>Rise</head> <p>1<lb/>Taking the <del>old</del> <add>present</add> land<lb/>is building upon the<lb/>old foundations.<lb/>p.</p> <p>2<lb/>Objections to a new<lb/>
 
choice.<lb/>1.  Delay  p.</p> <p>3<lb/>2.  Superior hardship<lb/>to an other<lb/>Proprietor.  p.</p> <p>4<lb/>3 &#x2014; or neighbourhood.<lb/>p.</p> <p>5<lb/>4.  Vesting a dangerous<lb/>power in the<lb/>Proposer, if unconstructed</p>
 
<p>6<lb/>5.  If not, would<lb/>require the <del>same</del> <add>old</add><lb/>Commission of<lb/><sic>Controul.</sic>  p.</p> <p>7<lb/>&#x2014; who before <sic>delay'd</sic><lb/><add>the business 3 years</add></p> <p>8<lb/>&amp;  <del>what</del> could not<lb/>make a different<lb/>choice.</p><p>9<lb/>Administration<lb/>imputations which<lb/>a new choice would<lb/>draw upon their<lb/>justice.  p.6</p><pb/> <!-- start of second column --><p>11<lb/>&#x2014; which would be the<lb/>
stronger the more<lb/>popular the plan.<lb/><del>Difficulty of<lb/>finding</del> in other<lb/>respects. p.<del>7</del> 6.</p> <p>11<lb/><del>Fit persons in<lb/>whom to vest<lb/>a new device<lb/>hardly to be found<lb/>1. – not the</del></p><p>12<lb/>A new choice<lb/>could not be vested<lb/>with propriety<lb/>1. &#x2014; in the <del>proposer</del><lb/>Supervisors</p> <p>13<lb/>2 &#x2014; nor in any<lb/>other <add>third</add> person <del>than<lb/>the proposer</del></p><p>14<lb/><sic>Indispensableness</sic><lb/>of the present spot<lb/>or a similar<lb/>one to his performance<lb/>of his Contract.</p> <p>15<lb/>Adhering to the<lb/>present choice<lb/>
<del>remains all</del><lb/>is free from all<lb/>objections</p>
<p>16<lb/><del>The new plan<lb/>being every thing<lb/>that the old one<lb/>was and more</del><lb/>The claim of the<lb/>old plan upon<lb/>the present spot<lb/>continues with <sic>encreased</sic><lb/>force in favour<lb/>of the new one.</p> <pb/> <!-- start of third column --><head>Reasons against<lb/>new Valuation</head> <p>1<lb/>The value found<lb/>can not but be<lb/>taken for a <del>f</del> true<lb/>one for the <hi rend="underline">time</hi>.<lb/>p.</p> <p>2<lb/>But may be insufficient<lb/>at this<lb/>time <del>in the supposition</del> <add>by reason <del>of</del></add><lb/>of an <del>rate</del> intermediate<lb/>fall in<lb/>the value of money.<lb/><add>Whence the justice (as<lb/>admitted) of a fresh<lb/><unclear>spring</unclear> to find a supplemental price.</add><lb/><del>2. of intervening<lb/>improvements made</del></p> <p>3<lb/><del>As to improvement<lb/>no such impr</del><lb/>As to <add>intervening</add> improvement<lb/>none.  <del>have been<lb/>made.</del></p> <p>4<lb/>If any, reimbursement<lb/>
offered.</p> <p>5<lb/><del>6</del><lb/>On any other ground<lb/>a valuation <unclear>down</unclear><lb/>would <unclear>impeach</unclear><lb/>the first verdict</p>
<p>6<lb/>Proprietors have<lb/>no ground for<lb/>claiming <del>a price</del> <add>any thing</add><lb/>beyond the true<lb/>
value.</p> <p>7<lb/>nor any reason to<lb/>expect it from a<lb/>
new valuation</p> <pb/><!-- at the bottom of the fourth column --><p>7<lb/>Certainty the<lb/>only reason for<lb/>the Proposers contending<lb/>for the old one.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:47, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Battersea Rise 17 Panopt. Bill
Prefat

Reasons for adherg
to the old choice
of Battersea
Rise

1
Taking the old present land
is building upon the
old foundations.
p.

2
Objections to a new
choice.
1. Delay p.

3
2. Superior hardship
to an other
Proprietor. p.

4
3 — or neighbourhood.
p.

5
4. Vesting a dangerous
power in the
Proposer, if unconstructed

6
5. If not, would
require the same old
Commission of
Controul. p.

7
— who before delay'd
the business 3 years

8
& what could not
make a different
choice.

9
Administration
imputations which
a new choice would
draw upon their
justice. p.6


---page break---

11
— which would be the
stronger the more
popular the plan.
Difficulty of
finding
in other
respects. p.7 6.

11
Fit persons in
whom to vest
a new device
hardly to be found
1. – not the

12
A new choice
could not be vested
with propriety
1. — in the proposer
Supervisors

13
2 — nor in any
other third person than
the proposer

14
Indispensableness
of the present spot
or a similar
one to his performance
of his Contract.

15
Adhering to the
present choice
remains all
is free from all
objections

16
The new plan
being every thing
that the old one
was and more

The claim of the
old plan upon
the present spot
continues with encreased
force in favour
of the new one.


---page break---
Reasons against
new Valuation

1
The value found
can not but be
taken for a f true
one for the time.
p.

2
But may be insufficient
at this
time in the supposition by reason of
of an rate intermediate
fall in
the value of money.
Whence the justice (as
admitted) of a fresh
spring to find a supplemental price.

2. of intervening
improvements made

3
As to improvement
no such impr

As to intervening improvement
none. have been
made.

4
If any, reimbursement
offered.

5
6
On any other ground
a valuation down
would impeach
the first verdict

6
Proprietors have
no ground for
claiming a price any thing
beyond the true
value.

7
nor any reason to
expect it from a
new valuation


---page break---

7
Certainty the
only reason for
the Proposers contending
for the old one.



Identifier: | JB/119/046/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

119

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

drawings

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39557

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in