JB/118/007/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/007/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/007/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/007/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>in this <add>first</add> stage of the business <add>as also to give</add> to answer by anticipation<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<add>to</add> any application <add>suggestion attempt</add>, if any such should<lb/>
 
be made for <add>of</add> a different <unclear>choice</unclear> to divert your<lb/>
 
Lordships choice <del>to and</del> from the <add>existing</add> spot so deliberately<lb/>
 
and unexceptionally chosen to any other.</p>
<p>For this purpose your Memorialist will <add>in the first place</add> beg<lb/>
leave in general <add>terms</add> to refer your Lordships <add>if necessary</add> to<lb/>
a paper <del>which had the honour to</del> <add>the paper marked A being the copy of</add> delivered <add>by him</add> to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>
Nepean <del>before the <gap/> in the <gap/> and</del> <add>at an early period of the treaty,</add><lb/>
<del>of which a copy is subjoined to the present Memorial</del><lb/>
and which as your Memorialist understood<lb/>
from M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Nepean had undergone the perusal <add>and met with the approbation</add> of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt<lb/>
and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Dundas.</p>
<p>With regard to the objections, all that he has<lb/>
ever heard <del>were confined to</del> <add>of as subsisting at any time <del>ordinarily</del> amount to but</add> two one of which<lb/>
subsists no longer:  viz:</p>
<p>1.  A reluctance on the part of <add><del>the</del></add> a Proprietor<lb/>
to part with <del>their</del> <add>his</add> property.  2.  A reluctance<lb/>
on the part of certain <del>persons</del> <add>inhabitants</add> of the neighbourhood<lb/>
to see an establishment for such a purpose<lb/>
instituted in their vicinity.</p>
<p>1.  As to <del>objec</del> reluctance <add>on the part <del>of</del></add> of <hi rend="underline">Proprietors</hi>,<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> an object the invalidity <add><del><gap/></del></add> of which is assumed and recognized by <del>this as well as</del> every <del>other</del> Act which has been ever made <del>for</del> taking private ground for public purposes, the <del>relevancy</del> <add>relevancy</add> of it in the present instance in particular stands</note> <del>that<lb/>
ground of objection is</del> fully discussed in the<lb/>
paper above referred to.  Happily however<lb/>
it has no longer any place.  The two persons<lb/>
interested are the Archbishop of York in right<lb/>
of his See, as tenant in fee ample:  and Earl<lb/>
Spencer as Lessee <add>for leases</add> under a beneficial Lease.<lb/>
On <del><gap/></del> the part of his Grace <del>the</del> <add>no such</add> reluctance <del>never</del> <add>ever<lb/>
subsisted</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:48, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

in this first stage of the business as also to give to answer by anticipation
to any application suggestion attempt, if any such should
be made for of a different choice to divert your
Lordships choice to and from the existing spot so deliberately
and unexceptionally chosen to any other.

For this purpose your Memorialist will in the first place beg
leave in general terms to refer your Lordships if necessary to
a paper which had the honour to the paper marked A being the copy of delivered by him to Mr
Nepean before the in the and at an early period of the treaty,
of which a copy is subjoined to the present Memorial
and which as your Memorialist understood
from Mr Nepean had undergone the perusal and met with the approbation of Mr Pitt
and Mr Dundas.

With regard to the objections, all that he has
ever heard were confined to of as subsisting at any time ordinarily amount to but two one of which
subsists no longer: viz:

1. A reluctance on the part of the a Proprietor
to part with their his property. 2. A reluctance
on the part of certain persons inhabitants of the neighbourhood
to see an establishment for such a purpose
instituted in their vicinity.

1. As to objec reluctance on the part of of Proprietors, an object the invalidity of which is assumed and recognized by this as well as every other Act which has been ever made for taking private ground for public purposes, the relevancy relevancy of it in the present instance in particular stands that
ground of objection is
fully discussed in the
paper above referred to. Happily however
it has no longer any place. The two persons
interested are the Archbishop of York in right
of his See, as tenant in fee ample: and Earl
Spencer as Lessee for leases under a beneficial Lease.
On the part of his Grace the no such reluctance never ever
subsisted


Identifier: | JB/118/007/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

17 20

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

007

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 988, vol. 5

ID Number

39061

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in