JB/118/449/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/449/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/449/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/449/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->4 May 1809</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><del>The reason presents</del>  On its surface the argument <add>reason</add><lb/>
 
presents a colour of utility:  <del>open</del> <add>less <del>talk</del> of</add> the surface and then see<lb/>
 
what becomes of it.</p>
 
<p><gap/> trades subject to Revenue laws, and thence<lb/>
liable to afford business to this part of the Court of Exchequer<lb/>
say for argument sake, twenty:  though many more would probably<lb/>
be found.</p>
<p><del>The</del> <add>Mischiefs</add> Inconveniences of the <hi rend="underline">packing</hi> system <add>or Residing Jury board or <gap/></add> as above, two<lb/>
opposite ones:  1. <add>On the one side </add>over-obsequiousness, subjection of the Jury<lb/>
to the Judge in whose power <del>they are</del> their sole use consists<lb/>
in their serving as a check:  on the other side, exposure to<lb/>
corruption, in the part of delinquents in the situation of defendants.</p>
<p><add>Alledged</add> Good effects of the same system, <del>only</del> appropriate instruction<lb/>
in relation to the <del><gap/></del> business of the several trades<lb/>
<del>in so far</del> <add>in so far as <del>by</del> to enable the Jury to form a correct judgement in the</add> as the instruments and operations respectively belonging<lb/>
to them question whether this or that law has <del>been</del> <add>by the defendant</add><lb/>
transgressed in the course of his operations and in respect<lb/>
of such or such articles of his stock, been transgressed, it<lb/>
may be necessary that the nature of such operations or<lb/>
of such parts of his stock should at the trial and in<lb/>
the sight and hearing of the Jury be explained.</p>
<p>But in this argument is assumed that in the<lb/>
course <del>of</del> <add>of one trial</add> and for the purpose of that trial in the instance<lb/>
of those several trades or at least in the instance of some<lb/>
considerable part of the <add>whole</add> number of them a <del>sufficient</del> conception<lb/>
of the nature of such stock and of such operations<lb/>
can not be in the space of time allotted to one trial be<lb/>
communicated in one part communicated, on the other<lb/>
part received and imbibed with a degree of accuracy<lb/>
sufficient for good judicature.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:49, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

4 May 1809

The reason presents On its surface the argument reason
presents a colour of utility: open less talk of the surface and then see
what becomes of it.

trades subject to Revenue laws, and thence
liable to afford business to this part of the Court of Exchequer
say for argument sake, twenty: though many more would probably
be found.

The Mischiefs Inconveniences of the packing system or Residing Jury board or as above, two
opposite ones: 1. On the one side over-obsequiousness, subjection of the Jury
to the Judge in whose power they are their sole use consists
in their serving as a check: on the other side, exposure to
corruption, in the part of delinquents in the situation of defendants.

Alledged Good effects of the same system, only appropriate instruction
in relation to the business of the several trades
in so far in so far as by to enable the Jury to form a correct judgement in the as the instruments and operations respectively belonging
to them question whether this or that law has been by the defendant
transgressed in the course of his operations and in respect
of such or such articles of his stock, been transgressed, it
may be necessary that the nature of such operations or
of such parts of his stock should at the trial and in
the sight and hearing of the Jury be explained.

But in this argument is assumed that in the
course of of one trial and for the purpose of that trial in the instance
of those several trades or at least in the instance of some
considerable part of the whole number of them a sufficient conception
of the nature of such stock and of such operations
can not be in the space of time allotted to one trial be
communicated in one part communicated, on the other
part received and imbibed with a degree of accuracy
sufficient for good judicature.


Identifier: | JB/118/449/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1812-09-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

449

Info in main headings field

to ld sidmouth

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b15 b3 e3 e15

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

draft; not included in letter 2190, vol. 8

ID Number

39503

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in