JB/541/445/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/541/445/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/541/445/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/541/445/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><!-- pencil --> Lett. 3:  J.B. to L. <unclear>Spencer</unclear></p>
<p>proper rule, all <hi rend="underline">Dwelling houses</hi>, it was on that account<lb/>
<p>proper rule, all <hi rend="underline">Dwelling houses</hi>, it was on that account<lb/>
that <del>the</del> neither the Cottages nor the Public<lb/>
that <del>the</del> neither the Cottages nor the Public<lb/>
Line 9: Line 10:
as I <del>am informed by</del> <add>understood from</add> Sir C. Bunbury, for the<lb/>
as I <del>am informed by</del> <add>understood from</add> Sir C. Bunbury, for the<lb/>
purchase of the Public House, to which purchase<lb/>
purchase of the Public House, to which purchase<lb/>
<add>no reluctance on the part of</add> the Landlord whoever he was,  
<add>no reluctance on the part of</add> the Landlord whoever he was, <del>shew or as testified <add>I suppose you the <unclear>Archbishop</unclear><gap/> <gap/></add></del><lb/>
</p>
(I suppose the ownership was in the same hand as<lb/>
 
that of the <del>contig</del> adjacent land) was testified.</p>
 
<p>Possibly with respect to such lots as are not comprised<lb/>
 
in the verdict of the Jury, or at least some of them,<lb/>
a lease might be ore eligible or more practicable<lb/>
than an absolute purchase:  if so, I should have no<lb/>
objection, if it were of sufficient length, or reasonable.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:50, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Lett. 3: J.B. to L. Spencer

proper rule, all Dwelling houses, it was on that account
that the neither the Cottages nor the Public
Houses House were included in the forced purchase conducted by
the Supervisors: but after the naked land had
been secured, there was a voluntary treaty on foot,
as I am informed by understood from Sir C. Bunbury, for the
purchase of the Public House, to which purchase
no reluctance on the part of the Landlord whoever he was, shew or as testified I suppose you the Archbishop
(I suppose the ownership was in the same hand as
that of the contig adjacent land) was testified.

Possibly with respect to such lots as are not comprised
in the verdict of the Jury, or at least some of them,
a lease might be ore eligible or more practicable
than an absolute purchase: if so, I should have no
objection, if it were of sufficient length, or reasonable.


Identifier: | JB/541/445/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1793-08-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

445

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in