JB/149/006/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/149/006/003: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/149/006/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/006/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/006/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>8)</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Memorial.</head></p>
 
<p><del><unclear>Sippio</unclear> answer'd a specific charge of peculation with a<lb/>
 
general</del></p>
 
<p>28.<lb/>
There is one celebrated <add>remarkable</add> instance indeed upon record,<lb/>
of a man <del>who</del> <add>in high office who found his account in</add> answering a specific charge<lb/>
of mal-administration, not with <del>utter</del> <add>absolute</add><lb/>
indeed, but with what is next to it, a general<lb/>
allegation <add>mention</add> of past services.  This man was Scipio.<lb/>
But <add>the</add> Scipios are not numerous in any age:  certainly<lb/>
not in ours:  nor were they <add>in fact</add> ever so numerous<lb/>
would <add>it be believed they were so.</add> [they be believed to be so.]  What is more<lb/>
it is not to be wished that <add>defence of such as can be called</add> a conduct like Scipios<lb/>
in the instance <del>of</del> in question, should even in men<lb/>
of equal <add>virtue</add> meet with the success that his did.  All circumstances<lb/>
considered it is by no means so clear<lb/>
to us <del><gap/></del> at this time of day that the charge upon<lb/>
Scipio had no foundation as it was then to the <del>mainstream</del> majority of the Roman populace.  Were<lb/>
a modern Paymaster to be charged with peculation,<lb/>
it would be looked upon as a <del>mark</del> <add>proof</add> rather<lb/>
less equivocal of his innocence to publish his accounts<lb/>
than (as Scipio did) to burn them.  One may perhaps go<lb/>
farther:  it would <del>perhaps</del> <add>not</add> only thought, but it<lb/>
would really be so:  say tho' that Paymaster were<lb/>
a Selby <del>and</del> <add>or</add> a Clarendon.  Suppose a man exempt<lb/>
from the <unclear>frailties</unclear> of human nature, you<lb/>
may take his word for his integrity:  but it is <add>a conduct</add> full<lb/>
a natural and much more satisfactory when a<lb/>
man is conscious of his integrity, to make public<lb/>
those documents that might serve <del>for</del> as tests<lb/>
of it, than to hide them.  To acquiesce in a man's<lb/>
embracing the <del>former</del> <add>latter</add> line of conduct rather than the former,<lb/>
<add>however</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:50, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

8)

Memorial.

Sippio answer'd a specific charge of peculation with a
general

28.
There is one celebrated remarkable instance indeed upon record,
of a man who in high office who found his account in answering a specific charge
of mal-administration, not with utter absolute
indeed, but with what is next to it, a general
allegation mention of past services. This man was Scipio.
But the Scipios are not numerous in any age: certainly
not in ours: nor were they in fact ever so numerous
would it be believed they were so. [they be believed to be so.] What is more
it is not to be wished that defence of such as can be called a conduct like Scipios
in the instance of in question, should even in men
of equal virtue meet with the success that his did. All circumstances
considered it is by no means so clear
to us at this time of day that the charge upon
Scipio had no foundation as it was then to the mainstream majority of the Roman populace. Were
a modern Paymaster to be charged with peculation,
it would be looked upon as a mark proof rather
less equivocal of his innocence to publish his accounts
than (as Scipio did) to burn them. One may perhaps go
farther: it would perhaps not only thought, but it
would really be so: say tho' that Paymaster were
a Selby and or a Clarendon. Suppose a man exempt
from the frailties of human nature, you
may take his word for his integrity: but it is a conduct full
a natural and much more satisfactory when a
man is conscious of his integrity, to make public
those documents that might serve for as tests
of it, than to hide them. To acquiesce in a man's
embracing the former latter line of conduct rather than the former,
however


Identifier: | JB/149/006/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-28

Box

149

Main Headings

Folio number

006

Info in main headings field

memorial

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / b6 / d7 / b8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia with lion motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49860

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in