JB/149/220/002

Click Here To Edit

it had been adopted some time before. Suppose
the intended bill had been carried 2 terms ago –
the house of Lords had been engaged d in the
morning during the whole session in a committee
of privileges and it was a rule
that the committee of privileges could
not sit at after the house had once sat. –
Its mornings were still occupied in the same
way and no hardly any thing had been
done with regard to appeals. During the
The Chancellor in the last term had only sat
three hours in hearing original causes and
3 days for the same purpose the term
before – during which sittings 2 original
causes had been heard in Hilary term and
one in Esther – so that the time which
would be have been gained f by the proposed
remedy for hearing appeals as made has was
only three days and a half – ( as to
this statement), how he would ask whether
this was an expedient likely to do any thing?
He wished these observations to be answered by
those who approved of this new expedient – and
assured them that none would could be more
obliged to them than he would be for correcting
him if he was wrong. But with the opinion
he entertained of the proposed remedy he
would should have esteemed it a base

Identifier: | JB/149/220/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	149	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	220	Info in main headings field
Image	002	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c3 / / /
Penner		Watermarks	iping 1820
Marginals		Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1810
Notes public		ID Number	50074
Box Contents