★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
Auto approved |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/169/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/547/169/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/> | |||
<!-- pencil --><head>Prize</head></p> | |||
<p><del>Here there is prohibition</del> Applied to a line <add>course</add> of conduct<lb/> | |||
considered as pernicious <add>detrimental to the service</add>, here then is prohibition, and<lb/> | |||
<add>for the giving effect to this prohibition</add> punishment or something which is <add>that seems</add> designed to operate<lb/> | |||
as punishment, <gap/>.</p> | |||
<p>But in Section 4 as above <add>we have seen</add> <del>something</del> <add>an arrangement has been seen</add> which<lb/> | |||
though certainly not designed to operate as <del><gap/></del> reward<lb/> | |||
yet still as far as it goes <del>having</del> does operate <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
in that character operate upon and tend to produce<lb/> | |||
the course of conduct meant in the other case to be<lb/> | |||
prevented. Under Section <unclear>2</unclear>, except in the particular<lb/> | |||
case brought to view in <del>§</del> Section 4, seamen <add>who</add> having<lb/> | |||
soldiers on board along with them, take a prize are<lb/> | |||
to <unclear>no</unclear> such soldiers <gap/> in along with them for a<lb/> | |||
share. But under Section 4, in the particular case<lb/> | |||
brought to view in that Section viz. <del>their <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
both descriptions of military men being employed<lb/> | |||
together on a conjunction expedition having for its object <add>the object<lb/> | |||
of the attack a</add> the capture of a fortress on land, <del><gap/></del> and<lb/> | |||
a prize being taken in the voyage to <del>or even</del> such<lb/> | |||
fortress or even in the voyage from it, no soldier is <add>person belonging<lb/> | |||
to the army</add> to have any share in such prize.</p> | |||
<p><del>Whatever the cases</del> Now then, in regard to this law<lb/> | |||
made to prevent <add>the</add> sacrificing or delaying <add>of</add> ships under<lb/> | |||
convoy <add>or for securing</add> in pursuit of prizes, <add>taking all these Sections together</add> what is the consequence?<lb/> | |||
It is – that if with <del>a ship or</del> ships <del>destined for</del> <add>occupied in</add> a conjunct<lb/> | |||
expedition under his care a naval Commander in disobedience <add>violation<lb/> | |||
of his duty</add> to the law, to <add>at</add> the prejudice of <add>such his duty</add> the object of his <add>the</add> expedition<lb/> | |||
goes out of his course and takes prizes, in such case <del>if he</del> supposing<lb/> | |||
matters be so managed as to escape being <add>prosecuted before</add> tried by a Court<lb/> | |||
Marshal, or to escape<lb/> | |||
being condemned by it<lb/> | |||
a naval commander is better off than he would be, if having soldiers on board he had taken a prize without any such violation of duty.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Decr 1810
Prize
Here there is prohibition Applied to a line course of conduct
considered as pernicious detrimental to the service, here then is prohibition, and
for the giving effect to this prohibition punishment or something which is that seems designed to operate
as punishment, .
But in Section 4 as above we have seen something an arrangement has been seen which
though certainly not designed to operate as reward
yet still as far as it goes having does operate
in that character operate upon and tend to produce
the course of conduct meant in the other case to be
prevented. Under Section 2, except in the particular
case brought to view in § Section 4, seamen who having
soldiers on board along with them, take a prize are
to no such soldiers in along with them for a
share. But under Section 4, in the particular case
brought to view in that Section viz. their
both descriptions of military men being employed
together on a conjunction expedition having for its object the object
of the attack a the capture of a fortress on land, and
a prize being taken in the voyage to or even such
fortress or even in the voyage from it, no soldier is person belonging
to the army to have any share in such prize.
Whatever the cases Now then, in regard to this law
made to prevent the sacrificing or delaying of ships under
convoy or for securing in pursuit of prizes, taking all these Sections together what is the consequence?
It is – that if with a ship or ships destined for occupied in a conjunct
expedition under his care a naval Commander in disobedience violation
of his duty to the law, to at the prejudice of such his duty the object of his the expedition
goes out of his course and takes prizes, in such case if he supposing
matters be so managed as to escape being prosecuted before tried by a Court
Marshal, or to escape
being condemned by it
a naval commander is better off than he would be, if having soldiers on board he had taken a prize without any such violation of duty.
|
Identifier: | JB/547/169/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1810-12-14 |
|||
|
547 |
|||
|
169 |
Prizes |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
