JB/547/193/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/193/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/193/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/193/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->27 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Prize  1805 1809</head></p>
 
<p><del>The general clause about bounty money it comes as<lb/>
 
if  Of</del> In the composition of this consolidation Act<lb/>
 
it seems as if <add>one is tempted to suspect</add> the <gap/> as well as the pen had no<lb/>
small share.</p>
<p>This general clause <add>provision</add> about bounty money for example<lb/>
was it not cut out of some <del>consolidating</del> <add>one of the consolidated</add> Acts, <del>and<lb/>
so</del> fastened by pen or paste to a piece of blank paper<lb/>
and thus inserted between the Section that <add>which</add> immediately<lb/>
precedes and that which immediately follows it?  If<lb/>
the pen was the instrument employed on the <unclear>insistence</unclear> of<lb/>
it, either it was the pen of some copying Clerk operating<lb/>
without a <add>so much</add> thought about purport and effect, or if it<lb/>
was the pen of the official draughtsman, no sooner<lb/>
had he framed it, than the contents must have slipped<lb/>
out of his mind.  For throughout the whole of the sequel<lb/>
<del>whatsoever follows concerning bounty money</del> <add>as often as bounty money is mentioned</add> the regulating<lb/>
pen moves as exactly as if there had been<lb/>
no such clause.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

27 Decr 1810
Prize 1805 1809

The general clause about bounty money it comes as
if Of
In the composition of this consolidation Act
it seems as if one is tempted to suspect the as well as the pen had no
small share.

This general clause provision about bounty money for example
was it not cut out of some consolidating one of the consolidated Acts, and
so
fastened by pen or paste to a piece of blank paper
and thus inserted between the Section that which immediately
precedes and that which immediately follows it? If
the pen was the instrument employed on the insistence of
it, either it was the pen of some copying Clerk operating
without a so much thought about purport and effect, or if it
was the pen of the official draughtsman, no sooner
had he framed it, than the contents must have slipped
out of his mind. For throughout the whole of the sequel
whatsoever follows concerning bounty money as often as bounty money is mentioned the regulating
pen moves as exactly as if there had been
no such clause.


Identifier: | JB/547/193/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

193

Info in main headings field

Prizes. 1805. 1809.

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in