★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/547/199/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
Auto approved |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/199/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/547/199/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/> | |||
<!-- pencil --><head>Prize 1805 1810</head></p> | |||
<p><add>Be it as it may in regard to propriety</add> Setting propriety out of the account, in any one of<lb/> | |||
those three versions <add>redactions</add> there would have been <del>consistency</del> <add>distinctness</add>,<lb/> | |||
distinctness would have been undisturbed.</p> | |||
<p>1. The first would have required in comparison but<lb/> | |||
little thought: upon the face of it, it promises to be<lb/> | |||
unexceptionable: <del>and</del> to be applicable with equal propriety<lb/> | |||
<add>without exception</add> to the three less principal cases <add>whether the money were the produce of</add> viz. bounty, salvage and <add>or</add><lb/> | |||
seizure.</p> | |||
<p>2. The second so far as it went <add>goes</add> the second<lb/> | |||
would have been at least equally unexceptionable.<lb/> | |||
It would not however have been sufficiently ample.<lb/> | |||
For in the case of prize money, after distribution has been<lb/> | |||
carried as far as it can be carried, remains in general<lb/> | |||
a residuum that requires to be disposed of, and by these<lb/> | |||
Acts is accordingly <add>meant to be</add> transferred to Greenwich <add>or Chelsea</add> Hospital<lb/> | |||
from whom the operation of distribution may be <gap/><lb/> | |||
in, as occasion calls <add>demand and opportunity present themselves</add>.</p> | |||
<p>To a disposal thus imperfect the provision made<lb/> | |||
in and by this Section <add>§ 31</add> of the amending Act <unclear>confirms</unclear><lb/> | |||
as may be seen the provision which it has made.</p> | |||
<p>3. The third, being <del>much</del> in its application <add>range</add><lb/> | |||
much more extensive than the most extensive of the other<lb/> | |||
two is <add>would</add> on that account more extensively beneficial<lb/> | |||
supposing always, that in the regulations respecting prizes<lb/> | |||
there are not any which if applied to the case of seizures<lb/> | |||
would not be found inapplicable – incapable of being<lb/> | |||
applied without being <add>in this or that instance</add> productive of special inconvenience.<lb/> | |||
Whether in fact they are all of them thus <add>beneficially and</add> unexceptionably<lb/> | |||
applicable is a question the <add>a correct and safe</add> answer <del>of</del> to which can not be<lb/> | |||
given without an examination made of each of the sections in question<lb/> | |||
with a view to this<lb/> | |||
particular purpose<lb/> | |||
by corresponding <unclear>sweeping</unclear></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Decr 1810
Prize 1805 1810
Be it as it may in regard to propriety Setting propriety out of the account, in any one of
those three versions redactions there would have been consistency distinctness,
distinctness would have been undisturbed.
1. The first would have required in comparison but
little thought: upon the face of it, it promises to be
unexceptionable: and to be applicable with equal propriety
without exception to the three less principal cases whether the money were the produce of viz. bounty, salvage and or
seizure.
2. The second so far as it went goes the second
would have been at least equally unexceptionable.
It would not however have been sufficiently ample.
For in the case of prize money, after distribution has been
carried as far as it can be carried, remains in general
a residuum that requires to be disposed of, and by these
Acts is accordingly meant to be transferred to Greenwich or Chelsea Hospital
from whom the operation of distribution may be
in, as occasion calls demand and opportunity present themselves.
To a disposal thus imperfect the provision made
in and by this Section § 31 of the amending Act confirms
as may be seen the provision which it has made.
3. The third, being much in its application range
much more extensive than the most extensive of the other
two is would on that account more extensively beneficial
supposing always, that in the regulations respecting prizes
there are not any which if applied to the case of seizures
would not be found inapplicable – incapable of being
applied without being in this or that instance productive of special inconvenience.
Whether in fact they are all of them thus beneficially and unexceptionably
applicable is a question the a correct and safe answer of to which can not be
given without an examination made of each of the sections in question
with a view to this
particular purpose
by corresponding sweeping
|
Identifier: | JB/547/199/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1810-12-27 |
|||
|
547 |
|||
|
199 |
Prizes. 1805. 1809. |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
