JB/547/242/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/242/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/547/242/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/242/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/242/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->23 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Prizes  1805 1809</head></p>
 
<p>Act 1809.  Sect. 12.  <add>To</add> The case of a prize condemned in the<lb/>
 
East Indies is the case to which the <add>matter of</add> provision in this<lb/>
 
Section are <add>is</add> confined.  <del>to</del></p>
<p>Under the direction of the Court, <del>at</del> "on the Application<lb/>
of the" Greenwich Treasurers <add>Deputy</add> there resident, the Agent is <add>shall</add><lb/>
at the election of this Deputy, to pay over to him the<lb/>
said Deputy, all unclaimed and forfeited shares and<lb/>
balances, or else remit them to the Treasurer in England<lb/>
.... <add>remit them</add> in what way as to time? – Answer, in<lb/>
this way.  Viz. "so that the same may be paid to the<lb/>
said Treasurer within twelve months after the said<lb/>
Agent .... shall have exhibited his .... accounts in<lb/>
said Court of Vice Admiralty.</p>
<p>Good.  But where the scene lies in England, by<lb/>
the Act of 1805, viz. in &sect;. 67, it was supposed that <add>on the part of Captors</add> to<lb/>
the <add>such</add> Account when delivered <del>reasonable</del> objections entitled<lb/>
to consideration <add>a hearing be heard</add>, objections requiring to be confirmed or<lb/>
disallowed might be apt to arise.</p>
<p>But is it in <add>to</add> England alone that the danger <add>evil</add><lb/>
of objectionable accounts is confined?  In the case of an<lb/>
Agent the air of Hindostan is it in the case of an<lb/>
Agent a <add>any such</add> sure preservation against all such complaints <add>the complaints</add><lb/>
as those of <add>fraud</add> rapacity and negligence?</p>
<p>Except <hi rend="underline">what</hi> is given as above to the High Court in<lb/>
London, For the <del><gap/></del> receiving and taking cognizance of<lb/>
any such complaints, I find not <del>a <gap/> Act</del> <add>my researches have not enabled me to discover</add> any authority<lb/>
in either Act.  <del>B</del></p>
<p>But <add>at any future time</add>, suppose any other enquirer more fortunate.<lb/>
<add>On this supposition,</add> In this case <del>twelve months</del> for lodging the money fairly in<lb/>
the hands of the Greenwich Treasurer twelve months peremptory seems rather an early period.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

23 Decr 1810
Prizes 1805 1809

Act 1809. Sect. 12. To The case of a prize condemned in the
East Indies is the case to which the matter of provision in this
Section are is confined. to

Under the direction of the Court, at "on the Application
of the" Greenwich Treasurers Deputy there resident, the Agent is shall
at the election of this Deputy, to pay over to him the
said Deputy, all unclaimed and forfeited shares and
balances, or else remit them to the Treasurer in England
.... remit them in what way as to time? – Answer, in
this way. Viz. "so that the same may be paid to the
said Treasurer within twelve months after the said
Agent .... shall have exhibited his .... accounts in
said Court of Vice Admiralty.

Good. But where the scene lies in England, by
the Act of 1805, viz. in §. 67, it was supposed that on the part of Captors to
the such Account when delivered reasonable objections entitled
to consideration a hearing be heard, objections requiring to be confirmed or
disallowed might be apt to arise.

But is it in to England alone that the danger evil
of objectionable accounts is confined? In the case of an
Agent the air of Hindostan is it in the case of an
Agent a any such sure preservation against all such complaints the complaints
as those of fraud rapacity and negligence?

Except what is given as above to the High Court in
London, For the receiving and taking cognizance of
any such complaints, I find not a Act my researches have not enabled me to discover any authority
in either Act. B

But at any future time, suppose any other enquirer more fortunate.
On this supposition, In this case twelve months for lodging the money fairly in
the hands of the Greenwich Treasurer twelve months peremptory seems rather an early period.


Identifier: | JB/547/242/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-12-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

242

Info in main headings field

Prizes. Acts 1805. 1809

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in