JB/547/288/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/288/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/288/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/288/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->20 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1811<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Prize  1805 1809</head></p>
 
<p>If under the <add>third</add> remaining branch of the alternative <hi rend="underline">the</hi><lb/>
 
proceeds be (the whole of the proceeds <add>be</add>) remitted "to such<lb/>
 
persons in England as the Captors shall appoint under the<lb/>
direction of the Court, for the purpose of being distributed<lb/>
In England, still the same difficulty, still the same<lb/>
abandonment of the <add>general standing</add> former policy attaches upon the import<lb/>
of this clause:  if <add>a</add> any part distributed in England?  so<lb/>
then must the whole be:  <add>to a</add> for the Hospital remains nothing.</p>
<p>Suppose the <add>first</add> <hi rend="underline">or</hi> <del><gap/></del> <add>employed</add> put by inadvertence<lb/>
instead of the word <hi rend="underline">and</hi> by this supposition would the<lb/>
difficulty be removed?  <add>No.</add>  Not <del>unless</del> if the supposition<lb/>
were to stop here.  Security <add>say</add> shall be given .... for the<lb/>
faithful distribution of the proceeds, and for the remitting<lb/>
(the residuum) thereof to the Treasurer of Greenwich Hospital<lb/>
....:  so far so good in the <del>words</del> <add>supposition</add> that the words<lb/>
the residuum or something equivalent to them had been<lb/>
remitted through inadvertence.  But neither <del>would</del> at<lb/>
this prize can <del>considering</del> intelligibility and consistency<lb/>
be conferred on <add>upon this chaos</add> this dark mass:  for then in <gap/><lb/>
of the last of the two <hi rend="underline">ors</hi> comes the senseless option<lb/>
between forwarding the <del>or</del> undistributable residuum <add>its proper distinction</add> to Greenwich<lb/>
Hospital, and the <del>f</del> vesting it in the hands of<lb/>
individuals in England, <add>and for what purpose?</add> for no other than their performing<lb/>
upon it the very operation viz distribution which<lb/>
by the supposition it is incapable of undergoing, such<lb/>
part of the proceeds as were capable of undergoing it anywhere<lb/>
having already undergone it in the foreign station<lb/>
in question, whatsoever it may have been.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

20 Decr 1811
Prize 1805 1809

If under the third remaining branch of the alternative the
proceeds be (the whole of the proceeds be) remitted "to such
persons in England as the Captors shall appoint under the
direction of the Court, for the purpose of being distributed
In England, still the same difficulty, still the same
abandonment of the general standing former policy attaches upon the import
of this clause: if a any part distributed in England? so
then must the whole be: to a for the Hospital remains nothing.

Suppose the first or employed put by inadvertence
instead of the word and by this supposition would the
difficulty be removed? No. Not unless if the supposition
were to stop here. Security say shall be given .... for the
faithful distribution of the proceeds, and for the remitting
(the residuum) thereof to the Treasurer of Greenwich Hospital
....: so far so good in the words supposition that the words
the residuum or something equivalent to them had been
remitted through inadvertence. But neither would at
this prize can considering intelligibility and consistency
be conferred on upon this chaos this dark mass: for then in
of the last of the two ors comes the senseless option
between forwarding the or undistributable residuum its proper distinction to Greenwich
Hospital, and the f vesting it in the hands of
individuals in England, and for what purpose? for no other than their performing
upon it the very operation viz distribution which
by the supposition it is incapable of undergoing, such
part of the proceeds as were capable of undergoing it anywhere
having already undergone it in the foreign station
in question, whatsoever it may have been.


Identifier: | JB/547/288/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-12-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

288

Info in main headings field

Prizes. 1805. 1809

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in