JB/547/429/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/429/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/429/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/429/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->27 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Prize  1805  1809  &sect;. 112, 109, 111</head></p>
 
<p>Reference to Introd about fixt penalties</p>
 
<p>If in <add>the</add> case of fraud discovered in <del>the</del> <add>an</add> account the<lb/>
 
result be <del>is</del> the recovery of the amount of the <del>intended <add>meditated</add></del><lb/>
<add>intended</add> sinister profit if made <add>received</add>, or the prevention of it if<lb/>
not received, in that <add>either</add> case, the fixt penalty of £500<lb/>
can scarcely fail of being adequate, and even in<lb/>
some circumstances more than adequate.  <add>But</add> On the<lb/>
other hand – if so it be that in any case after proof<lb/>
<add>made</add> of the fraud <add>offence</add>, and that proof sufficient to ground <add>secure</add> an<lb/>
actual recovery of the penalty, the profit of the fraud<lb/>
has been received and having been received remains<lb/>
unrecoverable, whether the provision operates as a penalty<lb/>
or as a licence, will depend upon the amount <add>quantum</add><lb/>
of the sinister profit retained.  Profit by the fraud<lb/>
say £1,000:  deduct penalty £500:  remains after<lb/>
payment of the penalty, neat profit £500;  the other <add>one</add><lb/>
£500 being so much money paid to him <del>by</del> <add>to</add> whose<lb/>
<add>use</add> the penalty is received – paid to him the the <add>a</add> licence<lb/>
to <del>give</del> cheat the trust fund out of the other £500.</p>
<p>Rule.  Wheresoever the profit of the offence being<lb/>
variable the <add>sole remedy is a penalty and that amount of that</add> penalty trusted to as the sole remedy is<lb/>
<add>penalty is</add> a fixt sum, <del>infinity <gap/> be as</del> <add>in every such case infinity to one but that</add> it is in each individual<lb/>
instance infinity to one is the odds that<lb/>
it <add>the penalty</add> is either excessive or insufficient:  and in every<lb/>
instance in which it is insufficient it operates<lb/>
as a licence.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:53, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

27 Decr. 1810
Prize 1805 1809 §. 112, 109, 111

Reference to Introd about fixt penalties

If in the case of fraud discovered in the an account the
result be is the recovery of the amount of the intended meditated
intended sinister profit if made received, or the prevention of it if
not received, in that either case, the fixt penalty of £500
can scarcely fail of being adequate, and even in
some circumstances more than adequate. But On the
other hand – if so it be that in any case after proof
made of the fraud offence, and that proof sufficient to ground secure an
actual recovery of the penalty, the profit of the fraud
has been received and having been received remains
unrecoverable, whether the provision operates as a penalty
or as a licence, will depend upon the amount quantum
of the sinister profit retained. Profit by the fraud
say £1,000: deduct penalty £500: remains after
payment of the penalty, neat profit £500; the other one
£500 being so much money paid to him by to whose
use the penalty is received – paid to him the the a licence
to give cheat the trust fund out of the other £500.

Rule. Wheresoever the profit of the offence being
variable the sole remedy is a penalty and that amount of that penalty trusted to as the sole remedy is
penalty is a fixt sum, infinity be as in every such case infinity to one but that it is in each individual
instance infinity to one is the odds that
it the penalty is either excessive or insufficient: and in every
instance in which it is insufficient it operates
as a licence.


Identifier: | JB/547/429/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

429

Info in main headings field

Prize. 1805. 1809 §. 112. 109. 111

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in