JB/047/024/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/024/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/047/024/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/024/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/024/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>7 Mar. 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>EVID. B.  Exclusion Improper Vexation Ch. 1. Self-prejudicing</head></p>
 
<p><head>&sect;. 4.  Authentication</head></p>
 
<p>1<lb/>
 
In not suffering a party<lb/>
(say y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi> Deft) to be called upon<lb/>
to recognize his own writing<lb/>
is injurious to both parties –<lb/>
to the Plff by putting him to<lb/>
the expence in the first instance,<lb/>
to the Deft ultimately if losing<lb/>
the cause (by far the most<lb/>
common case) he pays costs.<lb/>
p.1.</p>
<p>2.<lb/>
If costs <unclear>visited</unclear> always<lb/>
upon the party who losing<lb/>
the cause may thence be<lb/>
presumed to be in the<lb/>
wrong, the burthen might<lb/>
be considered as a punishment<lb/>
for his <hi rend="underline">mala fides</hi>.<lb/>
But the losing party is<lb/>
not always the party in<lb/>
the wrong (so many causes<lb/>
being lost by decisions on<lb/>
points foreign to the merits)<lb/>
nor if in the wrong, always<lb/>
in mala fides, nor always<lb/>
saddled with costs.  p.1.</p>
<p>3.<lb/>
Even if a punishment for mala fides,<lb/>
it would be bad, <gap/> proportionable.<lb/>
the factitious expence of<lb/>
finding a witness for this<lb/>
purpose is sometimes inconsiderable,<lb/>
sometimes<lb/>
ruinous.  p.2.</p>
<p>4.<lb/>
Sometimes the discovery<lb/>
is even impracticable.  p.2.</p>
<p>5.<lb/>
The only party ever<lb/>
benefited by this rule is<lb/>
the dishonest suitor, who<lb/>
avails himself of it to defeat<lb/>
justice.  p.2.</p>
<p>6.<lb/>
In confederacy with the<lb/>
Deft or thro' enmity to the<lb/>
Plff, an ill wisher of his<lb/>
may make him lose his<lb/>
cause beyond redemption,<lb/>
&amp; so ruin him, by pretending<lb/>
himself able to<lb/>
prove the hand-writing<lb/>
when it is no such thing:<lb/>
the falshood not being uttered<lb/>
in Court nor upon Oath is<lb/>
not punishable.  p.3.</p>
<p>7.<lb/>
In a case stiled a penal<lb/>
case, the Deft is never so<lb/>
much as expected or even<lb/>
suffered to acknowledge his<lb/>
own hand-writing.<lb/>
Here then the factitious<lb/>
expence is constant, and the<lb/>
success of the above mentioned<lb/>
fraud may be assured.</p>
<p>8.<lb/>
Encouraging, even necessitating<lb/>
such practices in<lb/>
a Court of Justice, turns is<lb/>
into a School of vice.  p.3.</p>
<p>9<lb/>
This is one of many instances<lb/>
in which English Judicature<lb/>
is tainted with<lb/>
immoralities from which<lb/>
the Judicature of all<lb/>
other Countries is free.<lb/>
p.3.</p>
<pb/>
<p><head>&sect;. 4.  Authentication</head></p>
<p>10.<lb/>
The public mind is actually<lb/>
tainted by the moral poisons<lb/>
thus poured into it from<lb/>
the Judgment seat.  Instance<lb/>
the <unclear>vasion</unclear> of two delinquents<lb/>
by the means<lb/>
spoken of in the Newspapers<lb/>
without censure.  p.3.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:54, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

7 Mar. 1806
EVID. B. Exclusion Improper Vexation Ch. 1. Self-prejudicing

§. 4. Authentication

1
In not suffering a party
(say ye Deft) to be called upon
to recognize his own writing
is injurious to both parties –
to the Plff by putting him to
the expence in the first instance,
to the Deft ultimately if losing
the cause (by far the most
common case) he pays costs.
p.1.

2.
If costs visited always
upon the party who losing
the cause may thence be
presumed to be in the
wrong, the burthen might
be considered as a punishment
for his mala fides.
But the losing party is
not always the party in
the wrong (so many causes
being lost by decisions on
points foreign to the merits)
nor if in the wrong, always
in mala fides, nor always
saddled with costs. p.1.

3.
Even if a punishment for mala fides,
it would be bad, proportionable.
the factitious expence of
finding a witness for this
purpose is sometimes inconsiderable,
sometimes
ruinous. p.2.

4.
Sometimes the discovery
is even impracticable. p.2.

5.
The only party ever
benefited by this rule is
the dishonest suitor, who
avails himself of it to defeat
justice. p.2.

6.
In confederacy with the
Deft or thro' enmity to the
Plff, an ill wisher of his
may make him lose his
cause beyond redemption,
& so ruin him, by pretending
himself able to
prove the hand-writing
when it is no such thing:
the falshood not being uttered
in Court nor upon Oath is
not punishable. p.3.

7.
In a case stiled a penal
case, the Deft is never so
much as expected or even
suffered to acknowledge his
own hand-writing.
Here then the factitious
expence is constant, and the
success of the above mentioned
fraud may be assured.

8.
Encouraging, even necessitating
such practices in
a Court of Justice, turns is
into a School of vice. p.3.

9
This is one of many instances
in which English Judicature
is tainted with
immoralities from which
the Judicature of all
other Countries is free.
p.3.


---page break---

§. 4. Authentication

10.
The public mind is actually
tainted by the moral poisons
thus poured into it from
the Judgment seat. Instance
the vasion of two delinquents
by the means
spoken of in the Newspapers
without censure. p.3.


Identifier: | JB/047/024/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1806-03-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-10

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

024

Info in main headings field

[[info_in_main_headings_field::evid. b. [ ] exclusion improper ch. [ ] self-prejudicing]]

Image

001

Titles

authentication

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

14892

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in