JB/047/029/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/029/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>6 May 1806<lb/>
EVID. B. .Exclusion General View. Ch. <unclear>5</unclear>v <unclear>Worst</unclear> to Ptff.</head><lb/>
S.<lb/>
 
<p>1<lb/>
By improper exclusion<lb/>
<gap/> mischief done on<lb/>
the Ptff's than on the <lb/>
Deft's side.<lb/>
p 1.<lb/></p>
 
<p>2.<lb/>
1. No mischief but when <lb/>
the toss falls on the side<lb/>
in the right<lb/>
Ptff oftener in the<lb/>
right than Deft - <lb/>
Causes of defence <unclear>find</unclear><lb/>
expectation of <del><gap/></del><lb/>
prevailing<lb/>
1. Taking all chances<lb/>
2. Gaining <unclear>from</unclear> <lb/>
3. Inability to pay <unclear>Etc</unclear><lb/></p>
 
<p>3.<lb/>
2. On Ptff's side take away<lb/>
all or any part of<lb/>
the evidence necessary<lb/>
for proof, miscarriage<lb/>
follows of course: not<lb/>
so on Deft's.<lb/>
p. 2.<lb/></p>
 
<p>4.<lb/>
3. In criminali the quantity<lb/>
of <unclear>probative</unclear> force<lb/>
necessary to produce<lb/>
decision on Ptffs side<lb/>
is greater than on Deft's.<lb/>
p. 2<lb/></p>
 
<p>5.<lb/>
4. To the prejudice of<lb/>
Deft's side, misdecision<lb/>
will not often take<lb/>
place without false<lb/>
evidence on Ptff's: whereas<lb/>
to <gap/> of Ptff's it<lb/>
may thro' original<lb/>
non existence or <gap/><lb/>
or non-forthcomingness<lb/>
of evidence. <lb/>
p.3.<lb/></p>
 
<p>6.<lb/>
5. Against Deft in criminali<lb/>
mendacious <lb/>
evidence, very rare:<lb/>
The more rare the<lb/>
heavier the punishment.<lb/>
p. 3. <lb/></p>
 
<p>7.<lb/>
Cases in which misdecision<lb/>
is producible<lb/>
to Defts prejudice without<lb/>
mendacity or bias.<lb/>
1. Misconception or misrecollection<lb/>
2. Real or other <unclear>circumstantialy</unclear><lb/>
fallacious tho'<lb/>
truly reported.<lb/>
p 3.<lb/></p>
 
<p>8.<lb/>
Failure of justice, the<lb/>
most common and mischievous<lb/>
result of exclusion<lb/>
when undue.<lb/>
p 3<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
 
<note><gap/><gap/><gap/> before<lb/>
<gap/><gap/></note><lb/>
 
<p>9.<lb/>
Persons interested in<lb/>
the production on undue<lb/>
exclusion.<lb/>
1. Mala fide suitors<lb/>
2. Malefactors, their accomplices<lb/>
&amp; well-wishers<lb/>
3. Professional lawyers<lb/>
4 Under the technical<lb/>
system Judges &amp; other <lb/>
Official lawyers.<lb/>
Exclusion, one of the<lb/>
grand engines of arbitrary<lb/>
power as above.<lb/></p>
 
<p>10<lb/>
The exclusion is an engine<lb/>
of arbitrary power: to<lb/>
serve the Deft decide<lb/>
by exclusion: to serve<lb/>
the Ptff, decide by reason. <lb/>
p.4<lb/></p>
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:54, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

6 May 1806
EVID. B. .Exclusion General View. Ch. 5v Worst to Ptff.

S.

1
By improper exclusion
mischief done on
the Ptff's than on the
Deft's side.
p 1.

2.
1. No mischief but when
the toss falls on the side
in the right
Ptff oftener in the
right than Deft -
Causes of defence find
expectation of
prevailing
1. Taking all chances
2. Gaining from
3. Inability to pay Etc

3.
2. On Ptff's side take away
all or any part of
the evidence necessary
for proof, miscarriage
follows of course: not
so on Deft's.
p. 2.

4.
3. In criminali the quantity
of probative force
necessary to produce
decision on Ptffs side
is greater than on Deft's.
p. 2

5.
4. To the prejudice of
Deft's side, misdecision
will not often take
place without false
evidence on Ptff's: whereas
to of Ptff's it
may thro' original
non existence or
or non-forthcomingness
of evidence.
p.3.

6.
5. Against Deft in criminali
mendacious
evidence, very rare:
The more rare the
heavier the punishment.
p. 3.

7.
Cases in which misdecision
is producible
to Defts prejudice without
mendacity or bias.
1. Misconception or misrecollection
2. Real or other circumstantialy
fallacious tho'
truly reported.
p 3.

8.
Failure of justice, the
most common and mischievous
result of exclusion
when undue.
p 3


---page break---

before

9.
Persons interested in
the production on undue
exclusion.
1. Mala fide suitors
2. Malefactors, their accomplices
& well-wishers
3. Professional lawyers
4 Under the technical
system Judges & other
Official lawyers.
Exclusion, one of the
grand engines of arbitrary
power as above.

10
The exclusion is an engine
of arbitrary power: to
serve the Deft decide
by exclusion: to serve
the Ptff, decide by reason.
p.4





Identifier: | JB/047/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1806-05-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-10

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

029

Info in main headings field

[[info_in_main_headings_field::evid. b [ ] exclusion general view ch. 5 worst to plff]]

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14897

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in