★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
mNo edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/047/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->29 April 1804<lb/> | |||
Ch. 18 | <!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p> | ||
<p><head>Ch. 18. <add>Choice</add> How to choose amongst the <add>above</add> means of forthcomingness.</head></p> | |||
<p>To what end all these <del>philosoph</del> arrangements and distinctions?<lb/> | |||
To this end. The subject matters of them <add>the operations processes</add> respectively varying upon<lb/> | |||
How | so large a scale, so in proportion must the practical effects of the<lb/> | ||
operations themselves: so in particular (which is the sort of effect<lb/> | |||
To what end all these arrangements and distinctions<lb/> | here in question) must the quantum of vexation liable to be produced.<lb/> | ||
The subject | In the case of the <unclear>ship</unclear> <add>we have seen</add> the <del>degree</del> quantum of vexation<lb/> | ||
so large a scale, so | varies <add>varying</add> from 1 to 1500: <del>this, as to vexation</del> <add>understand</add> the vexation to<lb/> | ||
themselves: so in particular which is the | persons in respect of person alone, over and above the vexation<lb/> | ||
to the same or other persons in respect of things, searched into<lb/> | |||
the | searched for, inspected, seized, detained. Thus <del>wide of each other<lb/> | ||
persons in respect of person over and above the <lb/> | are two points</del> extensive <add>on one hand</add> is the scale of variation for the quantum <add>amount</add><lb/> | ||
or other persons in respect of things, <lb/> | of collateral injustice producible by the application of these physical<lb/> | ||
searched for | powers to the securing the forthcomingness of evidence. But on<lb/> | ||
of variation for the | the other hand the importance of the cause is susceptible of a range<lb/> | ||
of collateral injustice producible by | of variation still more extensive: from the value of a farthing<lb/> | ||
to the <del>contents</del> <add>value of the coin and bullion</add> of the Bank of England: from the offence of <del>begging</del> <add><del>the</del> giving</add><lb/> | |||
<del>without <gap/></del> to a conspiracy of treason by <del>an </del> <add>a French</add> Infernal Machine<lb/> | |||
or <del>a G</del> an English Gunpowder plot. Thus ample <add>enormous</add> may be the<lb/> | |||
<del>mischief of</del> collateral inconvenience <add>producible</add> in the shape of vexation by <add>from</add><lb/> | |||
of collateral injustice | an incongruous exertion of those powers, on the one hand: thus<lb/> | ||
enormous the mischief in the shape of direct injustice by the<lb/> | |||
incongruous non-exertion of them on the other. What follows?<lb/> | |||
That the cases in which they respectively may or may not <add>shall or shall not</add> be exercisable<lb/> | |||
may perhaps <del>in</del> to a certain extent be fixed <add>with advantage</add> in the way of legislation:<lb/> | |||
but that after the utmost that can be done in the way of<lb/> | |||
legislation by <add>general rules and</add> determinate laws, much latitude of discretion ought<lb/> | |||
to be left, and on pain of capital inconvenience must be left to the<lb/> | |||
Judge.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
29 April 1804
Evidence
Ch. 18. Choice How to choose amongst the above means of forthcomingness.
To what end all these philosoph arrangements and distinctions?
To this end. The subject matters of them the operations processes respectively varying upon
so large a scale, so in proportion must the practical effects of the
operations themselves: so in particular (which is the sort of effect
here in question) must the quantum of vexation liable to be produced.
In the case of the ship we have seen the degree quantum of vexation
varies varying from 1 to 1500: this, as to vexation understand the vexation to
persons in respect of person alone, over and above the vexation
to the same or other persons in respect of things, searched into
searched for, inspected, seized, detained. Thus wide of each other
are two points extensive on one hand is the scale of variation for the quantum amount
of collateral injustice producible by the application of these physical
powers to the securing the forthcomingness of evidence. But on
the other hand the importance of the cause is susceptible of a range
of variation still more extensive: from the value of a farthing
to the contents value of the coin and bullion of the Bank of England: from the offence of begging the giving
without to a conspiracy of treason by an a French Infernal Machine
or a G an English Gunpowder plot. Thus ample enormous may be the
mischief of collateral inconvenience producible in the shape of vexation by from
an incongruous exertion of those powers, on the one hand: thus
enormous the mischief in the shape of direct injustice by the
incongruous non-exertion of them on the other. What follows?
That the cases in which they respectively may or may not shall or shall not be exercisable
may perhaps in to a certain extent be fixed with advantage in the way of legislation:
but that after the utmost that can be done in the way of
legislation by general rules and determinate laws, much latitude of discretion ought
to be left, and on pain of capital inconvenience must be left to the
Judge.
Identifier: | JB/047/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1804-04-29 |
1-2 |
||
047 |
evidence |
||
059 |
evidence |
||
001 |
ch. 18 /how to choose / choice/ amongst the above means of forthcomingness |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
14927 |
|||