JB/047/059/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/059/001: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->29 April 1804<lb/>
Ch. 18
<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p><head>Ch. 18.  <add>Choice</add> How to choose amongst the <add>above</add> means of forthcomingness.</head></p>
Evidence
<p>To what end all these <del>philosoph</del> arrangements and distinctions?<lb/>
 
To this end.  The subject matters of them <add>the operations processes</add> respectively varying upon<lb/>
How Choice to choose amongst the above means of  
so large a scale, so in proportion must the practical effects of the<lb/>
forthcomings.<lb/>
operations themselves: so in particular (which is the sort of effect<lb/>
To what end all these arrangements and distinctions<lb/>
here in question) must the quantum of vexation liable to be produced.<lb/>
The subject matter of the question them respectively varying upon<lb/>
In the case of the <unclear>ship</unclear> <add>we have seen</add> the <del>degree</del> quantum of vexation<lb/>
so large a scale, so as effects of the<lb/>
varies <add>varying</add> from 1 to 1500:  <del>this, as to vexation</del> <add>understand</add> the vexation to<lb/>
themselves: so in particular which is the root of  
persons in respect of person alone, over and above the vexation<lb/>
other humans in respect of things
to the same or other persons in respect of things, searched into<lb/>
the importance of the cause
searched for, inspected, seized, detained. Thus <del>wide of each other<lb/>
persons in respect of person over and above the <lb/>
are two points</del> extensive <add>on one hand</add> is the scale of variation for the quantum <add>amount</add><lb/>
or other persons in respect of things, <lb/>
of collateral injustice producible by the application of these physical<lb/>
searched for sacred . Thus wide of each other<lb/>
powers to the securing the forthcomingness of evidence.  But on<lb/>
of variation for the  
the other hand the importance of the cause is susceptible of a range<lb/>
of collateral injustice producible by
of variation still more extensive:  from the value of a farthing<lb/>
 
to the <del>contents</del> <add>value of the coin and bullion</add> of the Bank of England:  from the offence of <del>begging</del> <add><del>the</del> giving</add><lb/>
 
<del>without <gap/></del> to a conspiracy of treason by <del>an </del> <add>a French</add> Infernal Machine<lb/>
persons in respect of person above, over and above
or <del>a G</del> an English Gunpowder plot.  Thus ample <add>enormous</add> may be the<lb/>
 
<del>mischief of</del> collateral inconvenience <add>producible</add> in the shape of vexation by <add>from</add><lb/>
of collateral injustice
an incongruous exertion of those powers, on the one hand:  thus<lb/>
 
enormous the mischief in the shape of direct injustice by the<lb/>
incongruous non-exertion of them on the other.  What follows?<lb/>
That the cases in which they respectively may or may not <add>shall or shall not</add> be exercisable<lb/>
may perhaps <del>in</del> to a certain extent be fixed <add>with advantage</add> in the way of legislation:<lb/>
but that after the utmost that can be done in the way of<lb/>
legislation by <add>general rules and</add> determinate laws, much  latitude of discretion ought<lb/>
to be left, and on pain of capital inconvenience must be left to the<lb/>
Judge.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:54, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

29 April 1804
Evidence

Ch. 18. Choice How to choose amongst the above means of forthcomingness.

To what end all these philosoph arrangements and distinctions?
To this end. The subject matters of them the operations processes respectively varying upon
so large a scale, so in proportion must the practical effects of the
operations themselves: so in particular (which is the sort of effect
here in question) must the quantum of vexation liable to be produced.
In the case of the ship we have seen the degree quantum of vexation
varies varying from 1 to 1500: this, as to vexation understand the vexation to
persons in respect of person alone, over and above the vexation
to the same or other persons in respect of things, searched into
searched for, inspected, seized, detained. Thus wide of each other
are two points
extensive on one hand is the scale of variation for the quantum amount
of collateral injustice producible by the application of these physical
powers to the securing the forthcomingness of evidence. But on
the other hand the importance of the cause is susceptible of a range
of variation still more extensive: from the value of a farthing
to the contents value of the coin and bullion of the Bank of England: from the offence of begging the giving
without to a conspiracy of treason by an a French Infernal Machine
or a G an English Gunpowder plot. Thus ample enormous may be the
mischief of collateral inconvenience producible in the shape of vexation by from
an incongruous exertion of those powers, on the one hand: thus
enormous the mischief in the shape of direct injustice by the
incongruous non-exertion of them on the other. What follows?
That the cases in which they respectively may or may not shall or shall not be exercisable
may perhaps in to a certain extent be fixed with advantage in the way of legislation:
but that after the utmost that can be done in the way of
legislation by general rules and determinate laws, much latitude of discretion ought
to be left, and on pain of capital inconvenience must be left to the
Judge.


Identifier: | JB/047/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1804-04-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

ch. 18 /how to choose / choice/ amongst the above means of forthcomingness

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14927

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in