★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 27<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- note in pencil --> <p>Corrected <hi rend="underline">all but</hi> <note>128</note><lb/>2</p> <p><note><sic>Ch</sic> VII Suits — their sorts.<lb/>§.8.6. Plurilateral and<lb/> | <head>1824. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 27<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- note in pencil --> <p>Corrected <hi rend="underline">all but</hi> <note>128</note><lb/>2</p> <p><note><sic>Ch</sic> VII Suits — their sorts.<lb/>§.8.6. Plurilateral and<lb/>Unilateral</note></p> <!-- this page is organised in four columns --> <p><sic>Ch.</sic> VII Suits — their Sorts.<lb/>§.8.6. Plurilateral and<lb/>Unilateral</p> <p><!-- symbol in pencil --> ǂ 11.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 11. Here, if the supposition<lb/>be that there is<lb/>but one suit, if there be<lb/>as many sides as interests,<lb/>there are as many <lb/>sides as Claimants:<lb/>or the suit may be resolved<lb/>into as many<lb/>elementary suits: in<lb/>each of which there may<lb/>be one pursuer, and<lb/>the rest all Defendants. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></p> <p>Note (a.)<lb/>Illustration on the<lb/>supposition of four<lb/>Co-claimants.</p> <!-- Marginal tick and 'Suits' in pencil --> <p><note>√</note> Suits and claimants<lb/>suppose four. A.B.C &D.<lb/>Suit 1. Claimant and<lb/>Pursuer A Joint Contestants<lb/>& Defendants B.C.D<lb/>Suit 2 Claimant B.<lb/>Joint Contestants A.C.D<lb/>Suit 3. Claimant C<lb/>Joint Contestants A.B.D.<lb/>Suit 4. Claimants D.<lb/>Joint Contestants A.B.C.</p> <p>12.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 12 Cause of the <!-- 'habit' in pencil --> habit<lb/>of considering a suit<lb/>as having but two sides,<lb/>whatever be the number<lb/>of antagonizing interests.<lb/>The design of the suit<lb/>originating in some one<lb/>party interested, his endeavours<lb/>have naturally<lb/>been — to engage all those<lb/>to join with him whose<lb/>claims he regarded as<lb/><sic>uncontestable</sic>, were it<lb/>only that they might share<lb/>with him in the <sic>expence</sic><lb/>all who did not join with<lb/>him were of course made<lb/>Defendants — that by the Judge<lb/>they might be compelled<lb/>to <sic>submitt</sic> to him the<lb/>making the <!-- continues in pencil to end of column --> division, or<lb/><unclear>any</unclear> distribution.</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column --> <p><sic>Ch</sic> VII Suits — their Sorts.<lb/>§.8.6. Plurilateral and<lb/>Unilateral</p> <p>13.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 13. Thus come to view<lb/>identity and diversity<lb/>as to suits.</p> <p>Every separate demand<lb/>may be considered as<lb/>constituting a suit.</p> <p>14.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 14. This admitted, in<lb/>every course of action,<lb/>ordinarily considered<lb/>as constituting the suit,<lb/>may be distinguished<lb/>as many elementary<lb/>suits, as these have been<lb/>made demands in the<lb/>course of it.</p> <p>15.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 15. Examples.<lb/>1. All <sic>excretitious</sic> suits<lb/>that have grown out<lb/>of the original, as per §.6.<lb/>2. All Counterdemands<lb/>made on the Defendant's<lb/>side.<lb/>3. The demand, in consequence<lb/>of which, a<lb/><foreign>Quasi</foreign> Jury Enquiry is<lb/>instituted.<lb/>4. The demand in compliance<lb/>with which,<lb/>Appeal is allowed.<lb/>5. Any demand by which,<lb/>after being instituted in<lb/><del>the</del> <add>one</add> judicatory, a suit<lb/>is for any purpose brought<lb/>before another: for example,<lb/>for effecting forthcomingness,<lb/>for evidence on <del>judicibilty</del> <add>execution</add><lb/>6. Each such suit may<lb/>be considered as resolved<lb/>into as many<lb/>suits as there are pursuers<lb/>in it.<lb/>7. So as to Defendants<lb/>8. The identity of a suit<lb/>may be considered as<lb/>destroyed, either by the accession<lb/>or the secession<lb/>of a party, on either side.</p> <pb/> <!-- start of third column --> <p><sic>Ch</sic> VII Suits — their Sorts.<lb/>§.8.6. Plurilateral and<lb/>Unilateral</p> <p>16.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 16. Us of the division<lb/>of suits into<lb/>plurilateral and unilateral<lb/> — that the <add>apparently co</add> unilateral<lb/>being seen to be<lb/>suits proper for the cognizance<lb/>of a Judge,<lb/>the Judge, in these cases,<lb/>may be subjected<lb/>to the same <hi rend="underline">checks</hi>,<lb/>as in other cases.<lb/>See <sic>Const.</sic> Code<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> XL. Judiciary Collectively<lb/>§. Checks.</p> <p>17.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 17. Use of the exposition<lb/>in regard to identity<lb/>and diversity — that<lb/>upon no assumption<lb/>in regard to identity<lb/>or diversity, any pretence<lb/>be built for an<lb/>arrangement not conducive<lb/>to the ends of<lb/>Justice, as per <sic>Ch.</sic> II.</p> <p>18.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 18. In particular, for<lb/>causing operations or<lb/>instruments to be repeated,<!-- tick in pencil in margin --><lb/>under the notion<lb/>of the extinction of the<lb/>suit: for example by<lb/>Death of a party.<lb/>Examples are various<lb/>in English procedure:<lb/>occasions and<lb/>pretences various:<lb/>ends & motives, the same</p> <p>19.<lb/><sic>Art</sic> 19. Particular use<lb/>in regard to succeeding<lb/>Stages of Enquiry<lb/><sic>recapitulatory</sic> & appellate<lb/>1. In the <sic>recapitulatory</sic><lb/>enquiry, all the <sic>excretitious</sic><lb/>suits that can<lb/>have influenced the<lb/>decision in the original<lb/>suit <sic>sh<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic> be brought to<lb/>view: none that have not.<!-- pencil tick in margin --></p> <pb/> <!-- start of fourth column --> <p>19 <sic>contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi></sic><lb/>2. So on the Appellate<lb/>Enquiry<lb/>But as, by the manifold<lb/>writing System,<lb/>the record containing<lb/>the whole proceedings<lb/>will be brought to view<lb/>in both stages without<lb/>fresh <sic>expence</sic>, the distinction<lb/>will apply not<lb/>to exhibition, but to<lb/><del><unclear>adversion</unclear></del> <add>observation</add>: to the notice<lb/><add>that may come to be</add> taken in the<lb/>course of argumentation.</p> <p><!-- in pencil --> √<lb/>ǂ Revise <sic>Art</sic> 11</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1824. Novr. 27
Procedure Code
Corrected all but 128
2
Ch VII Suits — their sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral
Ch. VII Suits — their Sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral
ǂ 11.
Art 11. Here, if the supposition
be that there is
but one suit, if there be
as many sides as interests,
there are as many
sides as Claimants:
or the suit may be resolved
into as many
elementary suits: in
each of which there may
be one pursuer, and
the rest all Defendants. (a)
Note (a.)
Illustration on the
supposition of four
Co-claimants.
√ Suits and claimants
suppose four. A.B.C &D.
Suit 1. Claimant and
Pursuer A Joint Contestants
& Defendants B.C.D
Suit 2 Claimant B.
Joint Contestants A.C.D
Suit 3. Claimant C
Joint Contestants A.B.D.
Suit 4. Claimants D.
Joint Contestants A.B.C.
12.
Art 12 Cause of the habit
of considering a suit
as having but two sides,
whatever be the number
of antagonizing interests.
The design of the suit
originating in some one
party interested, his endeavours
have naturally
been — to engage all those
to join with him whose
claims he regarded as
uncontestable, were it
only that they might share
with him in the expence
all who did not join with
him were of course made
Defendants — that by the Judge
they might be compelled
to submitt to him the
making the division, or
any distribution.
---page break---
Ch VII Suits — their Sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral
13.
Art 13. Thus come to view
identity and diversity
as to suits.
Every separate demand
may be considered as
constituting a suit.
14.
Art 14. This admitted, in
every course of action,
ordinarily considered
as constituting the suit,
may be distinguished
as many elementary
suits, as these have been
made demands in the
course of it.
15.
Art 15. Examples.
1. All excretitious suits
that have grown out
of the original, as per §.6.
2. All Counterdemands
made on the Defendant's
side.
3. The demand, in consequence
of which, a
Quasi Jury Enquiry is
instituted.
4. The demand in compliance
with which,
Appeal is allowed.
5. Any demand by which,
after being instituted in
the one judicatory, a suit
is for any purpose brought
before another: for example,
for effecting forthcomingness,
for evidence on judicibilty execution
6. Each such suit may
be considered as resolved
into as many
suits as there are pursuers
in it.
7. So as to Defendants
8. The identity of a suit
may be considered as
destroyed, either by the accession
or the secession
of a party, on either side.
---page break---
Ch VII Suits — their Sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral
16.
Art 16. Us of the division
of suits into
plurilateral and unilateral
— that the apparently co unilateral
being seen to be
suits proper for the cognizance
of a Judge,
the Judge, in these cases,
may be subjected
to the same checks,
as in other cases.
See Const. Code
Ch. XL. Judiciary Collectively
§. Checks.
17.
Art 17. Use of the exposition
in regard to identity
and diversity — that
upon no assumption
in regard to identity
or diversity, any pretence
be built for an
arrangement not conducive
to the ends of
Justice, as per Ch. II.
18.
Art 18. In particular, for
causing operations or
instruments to be repeated,
under the notion
of the extinction of the
suit: for example by
Death of a party.
Examples are various
in English procedure:
occasions and
pretences various:
ends & motives, the same
19.
Art 19. Particular use
in regard to succeeding
Stages of Enquiry
recapitulatory & appellate
1. In the recapitulatory
enquiry, all the excretitious
suits that can
have influenced the
decision in the original
suit shd be brought to
view: none that have not.
---page break---
19 contind.
2. So on the Appellate
Enquiry
But as, by the manifold
writing System,
the record containing
the whole proceedings
will be brought to view
in both stages without
fresh expence, the distinction
will apply not
to exhibition, but to
adversion observation: to the notice
that may come to be taken in the
course of argumentation.
√
ǂ Revise Art 11
|
Identifier: | JB/052/062/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-11-27 |
11-19 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
062 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
ch. vii suits - their sorts / plurilateral and unilateral |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / e2 / f128 |
||
|
john flowerdew colls |
j whatman turkey mill 1823 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1823 |
|||
|
16735 |
|||
