JB/052/136/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/136/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827 May 8<lb/>Judiciary : Procedure Code</head> <p><note>Preface</note></p> <p>&#9758; Note <gap/> opposition to Test Act repeal<lb/.Distinction between depredation<gap/> or <gap/></p> <p>&#9758; <gap/> to publish official Aptitude when the <gap/> <sic>encreasing</sic> Rate more<lb/>likely to pass?</p> <p>Reason for this hurrying &#x2014; Fear of seeing real improvement<lb/>obstructed, and even <sic>improbabilized</sic> by the <sic>expence</sic> of new<lb/>Officers with enormous Salaries</p> <p><foreign>Quere</foreign> how many <del><gap/></del> centuries would it take<lb/>to remove the already generally acknowledged abuses, at the<lb/>rate of progress <del><gap/></del> at which the operation has been and<lb/>is performing by the recent Statutes and at present depending<lb/><del><gap/></del> on <unclear>entreated</unclear> Bills.</p> <p><gap/> here to the old Statute for amendment of the<lb/>Law.</p> <p>No objection however to these: in the to road to Reform<lb/>every inch made <add>the step of a sloth</add> is better than none.</p> <p><sic>Antecedently</sic> to the <del><gap/></del> entering upon this hasty<lb/>edition I made <del>the following</del> an application of which what<lb/>follows is the tenor and the result</p> <p>the application had two objects.</p> <p>1. <add>One was</add> The having what prospect there may be <add>under the new <gap/></add> of <del>an <gap/></del>  <gap/><lb/>a comprehensible rule of action and security for every<lb/>thing that requires to be secured</p> <p>2. Further was the obtaining without <sic>expence</sic> to Government<lb/>some diminution of the sacrifice which the present<lb/>publication would necessitate in addition to the <add>late</add> sacrifices<lb/>which in the <del>late</del> <add>same</add> shape have been habitual and so<lb/>long as life remains will continue so to be.</p>
<head>1827 May 8<lb/>Judiciary : Procedure Code</head> <p><note>Preface</note></p> <p>&#9758; <unclear>Note Cannings</unclear> opposition to Test Act repeal<lb/>Distinction between Depredation<gap/> or <gap/></p> <p>&#9758; <gap/> to publish official Aptitude when the <unclear>Salary</unclear> <sic>encreasing</sic> Act more<lb/>likely to pass?</p> <p>Reason for their hurrying &#x2014; Fear of seeing real improvement<lb/>obstructed, and even <sic>improbabilized</sic> by the <sic>expence</sic> of new<lb/>Officers with enormous Salaries</p> <p><foreign>Quere</foreign> how many <del><gap/></del> centuries would it take<lb/>to remove the already generally acknowledged abuses, at the<lb/>rate of progress <del><gap/></del> at which the operation has been and<lb/>is performing by the recent Statutes and at present depending<lb/><del><gap/></del> on <unclear>entreated</unclear> Bills.</p> <p><gap/> here to the old Statutes for amendment of the<lb/>Law.</p> <p>No objection however to these: on the <unclear>lo</unclear> road to Reform<lb/>every inch made <add>the step of a sloth</add> is better than none.</p> <p><sic>Antecedently</sic> to the <del><gap/></del> entering upon this hasty<lb/>edition I made <del>the following</del> an application of which what<lb/>follows is the tenor and the result</p> <p>The application had two objects.</p> <p>1. <add>One was</add> The having what prospect there may be <add>under the new <gap/></add> of <del>an <gap/></del><lb/>a comprehensible rule of action and security for every<lb/>thing that requires to be secured</p> <p>2. Further was the obtaining without <sic>expence</sic> to Government<lb/>some diminution of the sacrifice which the present<lb/>publication would necessitate in addition to the <add>late</add> sacrifices<lb/>which in the <del>late</del> <add>same</add> shape have been habitual and so<lb/>long as life remains will continue so to be.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:55, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1827 May 8
Judiciary : Procedure Code

Preface

Note Cannings opposition to Test Act repeal
Distinction between Depredation or

to publish official Aptitude when the Salary encreasing Act more
likely to pass?

Reason for their hurrying — Fear of seeing real improvement
obstructed, and even improbabilized by the expence of new
Officers with enormous Salaries

Quere how many centuries would it take
to remove the already generally acknowledged abuses, at the
rate of progress at which the operation has been and
is performing by the recent Statutes and at present depending
on entreated Bills.

here to the old Statutes for amendment of the
Law.

No objection however to these: on the lo road to Reform
every inch made the step of a sloth is better than none.

Antecedently to the entering upon this hasty
edition I made the following an application of which what
follows is the tenor and the result

The application had two objects.

1. One was The having what prospect there may be under the new of an
a comprehensible rule of action and security for every
thing that requires to be secured

2. Further was the obtaining without expence to Government
some diminution of the sacrifice which the present
publication would necessitate in addition to the late sacrifices
which in the late same shape have been habitual and so
long as life remains will continue so to be.




Identifier: | JB/052/136/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1827-05-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

136

Info in main headings field

judiciary procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16809

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in