JB/052/161/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/161/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><sic>Art</sic> or 2</p> <p>As to <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Peel what is but too unquestionable<lb/>is that <gap/> <gap/> his plans to exempt <add>grant to</add> any more<lb/>than a small minority of the people of this country <add> his fellowships in England</add><lb/><add>an exemption</add> from the established denial of justice. What is no<lb/>less unquestionable is &#x2014; that in no <del><gap/></del> person where<lb/><del>he <gap/></del> with complacency he has taken or is likely<lb/>ever to take into consultation, has he any the<lb/>smallest chance of receiving on any occasion any<lb/>counsel, the object or tendency of which will not<lb/>be to keep this denial <add>for ever</add> in a state as nearly conformable<lb/>as may be to its present state.</p> <p>Advocates! no chance of any tolerable degree<lb/><add>applied in the shape of</add> of impartiality in any judicatory which is not attended<lb/>by a tribe <add>a due assortment</add> of Advocates.  Advocates? and by whom are<lb/>they to be paid.  Of those who every one of them are altogether<lb/>unable for the support of their interest in a civil suit to provide<lb/> <!-- continues in margin -->themselves with money<lb/>sufficient to produce<lb/>on the part of an Advocate<lb/>so much as a<lb/>single attendance &#x2014;<lb/>of persons thus constrained<lb/>is not the great<lb/>majority of the people<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page -->of this country <add>England</add> consequently composed?</p>
<p><sic>Art</sic> or 2</p> <p>As to <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Peel what is but too unquestionable<lb/>is that <gap/> me his plans to exempt <add>grant to</add> any more<lb/>than a small minority of the people of this country <add> his fellowships in England</add><lb/><add>an exemption</add> from the established denial of justice. What is no<lb/>less unquestionable is &#x2014; that in no <del><gap/></del> person whom<lb/><del>he has</del> with complacency he has taken or is likely<lb/>ever to take into consultation, has he any the<lb/>smallest chance of receiving on any occasion any<lb/>counsel, the object or tendency of which will not<lb/>be to keep this denial <add>for ever</add> in a state as nearly conformable<lb/>as may be to its present state.</p> <p>Advocates! no chance of any tolerable degree<lb/>of <add>applied in the shape of</add> impartiality in any judicatory which is not attended<lb/>by a tribe <add>a due assortment</add> of Advocates.  Advocates? and by whom are<lb/>they to be paid.  Of those who every one of them are altogether<lb/>unable for the support of their interest in a civil suit to provide<lb/> <!-- continues in margin -->themselves with money<lb/>sufficient to produce<lb/>on the part of an Advocate<lb/>so much as a<lb/>single attendance &#x2014;<lb/>of persons thus constrained<lb/>is not the great<lb/>majority of the people<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page -->of this country <add>England</add> consequently composed?</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:55, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Art or 2

As to Mr Peel what is but too unquestionable
is that me his plans to exempt grant to any more
than a small minority of the people of this country his fellowships in England
an exemption from the established denial of justice. What is no
less unquestionable is — that in no person whom
he has with complacency he has taken or is likely
ever to take into consultation, has he any the
smallest chance of receiving on any occasion any
counsel, the object or tendency of which will not
be to keep this denial for ever in a state as nearly conformable
as may be to its present state.

Advocates! no chance of any tolerable degree
of applied in the shape of impartiality in any judicatory which is not attended
by a tribe a due assortment of Advocates. Advocates? and by whom are
they to be paid. Of those who every one of them are altogether
unable for the support of their interest in a civil suit to provide
themselves with money
sufficient to produce
on the part of an Advocate
so much as a
single attendance —
of persons thus constrained
is not the great
majority of the people
of this country England consequently composed?




Identifier: | JB/052/161/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1827-08-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

161a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 161.

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

002

Titles

morn. chron. augt 25th 1827

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16834

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in