JB/052/250/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/250/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Ch.III Judicial Application Procedure Code</head>
<note><del>&sect;.5. Application have<lb/>commenced.</del><lb/>
&sect;.5. Applications have commenced</note><lb/>
 
<p>Art.6. If <del>the</del> for want of appropriate aptitude the applicant is<lb/>
<gap/> unable to give <add>in the first instance</add> an intelligible answer to the above question, <add>in such manner <del>to</del> as to refer</add> <del>reforming the</del><lb/>
<del>&sect;.5. Application has commenced - Judge to Applicant</del><lb/>
case to any one of the general heads <gap/> <del>under</del> brought to view, the Judge <add>will</add> continue<lb/>
hearing and interrogating him all the <del>the Judge has succeeded in</del> the<lb/>
<del>purpose of the</del><add><gap/> <gap/> of his</add> application is sufficiently ascertained.</p>
 
<p><del>Art.1. When assured at the Applicate stating the</del><lb/>
<del>Applicant sets <gap/> in silence until addressed by the</del><lb/>
<del>Judge.</del></p>
 
<p>Art.<del>S</del>3. In any case it may be either on his <add>Applicant's</add> own account,<lb/>
is an accent of some other person that the applications<lb/>
is made.  But <unclear>here</unclear> the matter stands in the respect, the Judge<lb/>
will without difficulty understand, from the applicants statements.<lb/>
<del>An</del> Interrogating to that effect need not therefore be included in<lb/>
the Judge's address as above. For the several cases in which<lb/>
one person may make application on behalf of another see Ch.V<lb/>
Initiatory Application. ||</p>
 
<p><del>State <gap/></del> 4. If the commencement of the conversation or at<lb/>
any time in the course of it, if it  be clear that the Applicant<lb/>
can read, the Judge with his mind may point to, and<lb/>
if <unclear>near</unclear> enough <add>touch, the spot on which <add>say</add></add> <del><gap/>, the place there the</del> <add> legend, containing the</add> warning against falshood<lb/>
<del>is <gap/> in</del> displayed: as to which see Ch. XI Judically collectively</p>
 
<p>&sect;. <del>Justice Chamber.</del></p>
<p><del>&sect;</del> End of Section.</p>
<p>Art.10 If the application be contentious, the <add>conversation</add> <del>consvati</del><lb/>
will <unclear>provend</unclear> as per Ch.V <add><hi rend="underline">Initiatory</hi></add> <del>Iniat<gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">application</hi>. <add>S :</add> <del>if <gap/> <gap/></del>,<lb/>
<del>in the <gap/> described in Chapters <gap/>, <gap/> and respectivity</del></p>
<note><!-- In pencil -->To p.1<lb/>
at bottom</note><lb/>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Ch.III Judicial Application Procedure Code §.5. Application have
commenced.

§.5. Applications have commenced

Art.6. If the for want of appropriate aptitude the applicant is
unable to give in the first instance an intelligible answer to the above question, in such manner to as to refer reforming the
§.5. Application has commenced - Judge to Applicant
case to any one of the general heads under brought to view, the Judge will continue
hearing and interrogating him all the the Judge has succeeded in the
purpose of the of his application is sufficiently ascertained.

Art.1. When assured at the Applicate stating the
Applicant sets in silence until addressed by the
Judge.

Art.S3. In any case it may be either on his Applicant's own account,
is an accent of some other person that the applications
is made. But here the matter stands in the respect, the Judge
will without difficulty understand, from the applicants statements.
An Interrogating to that effect need not therefore be included in
the Judge's address as above. For the several cases in which
one person may make application on behalf of another see Ch.V
Initiatory Application. ||

State 4. If the commencement of the conversation or at
any time in the course of it, if it be clear that the Applicant
can read, the Judge with his mind may point to, and
if near enough touch, the spot on which <add>say</add> , the place there the legend, containing the warning against falshood
is in displayed: as to which see Ch. XI Judically collectively

§. Justice Chamber.

§ End of Section.

Art.10 If the application be contentious, the conversation consvati
will provend as per Ch.V Initiatory Iniat application. S : if ,
in the described in Chapters , and respectivity

To p.1
at bottom




Identifier: | JB/052/250/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

250

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b2 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16923

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in