★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- this whole page is crossed through in ink --> | |||
<head>1824 <sic>Nov.</sic> 14<lb/>Rationale of Reward</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ 2<lb/>(2</p> <p>The Editor <del><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham Manuscripts have been employed</del> <add>It now appears for the first time in an English draft<lb/>having the advantage of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham's</add><lb/><del>in it: and accordingly</del> <add> manuscript it is not</add> <del>it does not not profess to be</del> in every <lb/>part a literal translation of the <del>work of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Dumont</del> <add>French <del>as<gap/> by</del></add><lb/><del>The number of the matters</del> <add>Not to speak of the polish put upon the whole <del>by <gap/> <gap/></del></add><lb/><del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> of his predecessor a polish which to a degree<lb/>which the successor can not think of without regret<lb/>can not but have suffered at his hand</del> the matter of<lb/>it has in several places received <gap/> from the same<lb/><add><gap/></add> hand. These of course the present Editor could not desire<lb/>so ill of the public as to <sic>omitt</sic>: but, as often as they<lb/><sic>occurr</sic>, they stand distinguished by appropriate indications.</p> <p><del>An application made <add>from the</add> for by <add>the</add> present Editor to<lb/>the Author, and being relative to the of principle of<lb/>the addition p produced in answer of which the following<lb/>is an extraction</del></p> <p>An application suggested in <del><gap/></del> part by one<lb/>of the principal ones produced an answer of which the<lb/>following is an extract</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1824 Nov. 14
Rationale of Reward
+ 2
(2
The Editor Mr Bentham Manuscripts have been employed It now appears for the first time in an English draft
having the advantage of Mr Bentham's
in it: and accordingly manuscript it is not it does not not profess to be in every
part a literal translation of the work of Mr Dumont French as by
The number of the matters Not to speak of the polish put upon the whole by
of his predecessor a polish which to a degree
which the successor can not think of without regret
can not but have suffered at his hand the matter of
it has in several places received from the same
hand. These of course the present Editor could not desire
so ill of the public as to omitt: but, as often as they
occurr, they stand distinguished by appropriate indications.
An application made from the for by the present Editor to
the Author, and being relative to the of principle of
the addition p produced in answer of which the following
is an extraction
An application suggested in part by one
of the principal ones produced an answer of which the
following is an extract
Identifier: | JB/052/268/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-11-26 |
14 |
||
052 |
procedure code |
||
268 |
procedure code |
||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d16 / e5 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
16941 |
|||