JB/052/350/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/350/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><hi rend="underline">..</hi> 19</p>
<p><del>Constitutional Code</del> <add>Procedure Code</add> <del>Inactive Parts</del></p>
 
<note>IV Instructions<lb/>
Ch. Evidence<lb/>
S. Procured, how<lb/>
&sect;. Mode of Procurement<lb/>
- mo<gap/>gaborial<lb/>
Romanici<lb/>
1<lb/>
Investigatorial procedure<lb/>
Roman &amp; English widely<lb/>
different both defective</note><lb/>
 
<head>Instructions</head>
 
<p>Widely different in relation to investigatorial procedure in<lb/>
the characters of Roman-bred and English-bred procedure. <unclear>heavy</unclear><lb/>
with imperfection both of them.</p>
 
<p>As to Roman-bred procedure, throughout the penal<lb/>
branch of the field of law <add>solitary and extensive has been the application</add>  <del>it has gone along <gap/> <gap/></del> <note>2<lb/>
In Romebred procedure<lb/>
in the nonpenal branch<lb/>
scanty provision</note><lb/>
<add>given to such provision as it has made: in the non-penal branch</add> <del>and the provision it has made has been</del> <lb/>
on the other hand it <del>has been</del> the provision has been comparatively<lb/>
scanty, the <add>care</add> schedule remiss.</p>
<note>3<lb/>
To <add>simply</add>indicating evidence<lb/>
character given of appropriate<lb/>
evidence</note><lb/>
<p>At the same time for each of a clear and correct <lb/>
concept of the difference between appropriate and simply indicative<lb/>
evidence it has given to evidence which has been <lb/>
simply indicative the effect of appropriative evidence: for the<lb/>
affair of Ca<gap/> for example to such a length he did this<lb/>
confusion p<gap/>d that <add>when</add> between <del>the</del> in simple indicative evidence<lb/>
presented to the Judge and the appropriate evidence supposing<lb/>
any to exist there were four or five b<gap/>s of <add>alledged</add> simply<lb/>
<del>evi</del> indicative evidence interposed, it has notwithstanding<lb/>
been received and  made to operate <del>in the clear</del> as if it had been<lb/>
appropriate evidence. Standing before the Judges I said A<lb/>
heard from B that he <add>had</add> heard from C that C said he <add>had</add> heard from<lb/>
D that <add>he had heard from E that</add>E saw done
<del>the deed which is worth the <gap/> of</del> <add>by the accuser the deed with</add><lb/>
which the accused is charged.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr.. 19

Constitutional Code Procedure Code Inactive Parts

IV Instructions
Ch. Evidence
S. Procured, how
§. Mode of Procurement
- mogaborial
Romanici
1
Investigatorial procedure
Roman & English widely
different both defective

Instructions

Widely different in relation to investigatorial procedure in
the characters of Roman-bred and English-bred procedure. heavy
with imperfection both of them.

As to Roman-bred procedure, throughout the penal
branch of the field of law solitary and extensive has been the application it has gone along 2
In Romebred procedure
in the nonpenal branch
scanty provision

given to such provision as it has made: in the non-penal branch and the provision it has made has been
on the other hand it has been the provision has been comparatively
scanty, the care schedule remiss.

3
To simplyindicating evidence
character given of appropriate
evidence

At the same time for each of a clear and correct
concept of the difference between appropriate and simply indicative
evidence it has given to evidence which has been
simply indicative the effect of appropriative evidence: for the
affair of Ca for example to such a length he did this
confusion pd that when between the in simple indicative evidence
presented to the Judge and the appropriate evidence supposing
any to exist there were four or five bs of alledged simply
evi indicative evidence interposed, it has notwithstanding
been received and made to operate in the clear as if it had been
appropriate evidence. Standing before the Judges I said A
heard from B that he had heard from C that C said he had heard from
D that he had heard from E thatE saw done the deed which is worth the of by the accuser the deed with
which the accused is charged.




Identifier: | JB/052/350/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1823-10-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

350

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

instructions

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17023

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in