JB/052/352/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/352/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>1823. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 23</p>
<head>1823. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 23<lb/>Constitutional Code or Procedure</head> <p><note>III<lb/>  
<head>Constitutional Code Procedure</head> <note>III Evidence<lb/>
<sic>Ch.</sic> <del>Securities against</del> <add>Evidence</add> deception<lb/>
Ch. <del>Securities against de</del>ception<lb/>
&sect;.10 Probative form estimated<lb/>
S.10 Probation from estimated<lb/>
<foreign>Anglicé</foreign> - English Judge<lb/>
Anglici - English Judge<lb/>
untrustworthy</note></p>
untrustworthy</note><lb/>
 
<p>To a <del><gap/></del><add><gap/></add> to such valueless<add>dep<gap/>ty</add> the clerk of vigilence is assured<lb/>
(What is visible to all eyes is that either those who p<gap/>d <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of it,<lb/>
is that of <gap/><lb/>
any it <gap/> of no<lb/>
use to their culture, and therefore not many<lb/>
included.<lb/>
(<gap/> of the crime in the sin<gap/> interests.</p>
 
Of the whole but of <gap/> crime f<gap/> indeed are so mischievous<lb/>
for a gross <gap/> that which support that <add>in the <gap/></add> in the <gap/><lb/>
of that class of man who are d<gap/> Murder of


<p>To a <del><gap/></del> <add><unclear>cover</unclear></add> to such <unclear>matchless</unclear> immorality <add>depravity</add><gap/> the cloak of <unclear>relyance</unclear> is assured<lb/>(What is visible to all eyes is that either those who p<gap/>d to it have none of it,<lb/>or that if they have<lb/>any it is of no<lb/>
use to their <unclear>culture</unclear>, and therefore not in any<lb/>included.<lb/>(<unclear>Cause</unclear> of the errors in the form sinister interests.</p> <p><note>4<lb/>No vulgar error so<lb/>gross as that which<lb/>supposes Judge's object<lb/>to be minimization of<lb/>injustice</note></p> <p>Of the whole list of vulgar errors few indeed are so mischievous<lb/>for so gross as that which supposes that in the mind <add>on the part</add><lb/>of that class of those who are <sic>stiled</sic> Minister of Justice minimization<lb/>of injustice has been the end to which their labours <add>devotions</add> have been<lb/>directed. <del>the</del> to which the system of judicial procedure has in point<lb/>been directed: to minimization <del>after</del> substitute <del><gap/> <gap/></del><add>maximization</add><lb/>you will be near the truth.</p> <p><note>5<lb/>Maximization of<lb/>injustice their object</note></p><p>That injustice might be maximized it has been their interest<lb/>that of <add>the useless</add> falsity  &#x2014; the great constraint of injustice, the frequency should<lb/>be maximized: the falsity itself maximized and thence <add><unclear>moreover</unclear></add><lb/>
so also the credence given to it.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>
To this end maximization<lb/>of falsity &amp; deception</note></p> <p>To this end it is that to so many various descriptions<lb/>of persons on this special occasion for this special purpose &#x2014; the<lb/>license to <sic>committ</sic> <add>utter</add> judicial <sic>falshood</sic> with impunity &#x2014; in <unclear>one word</unclear><lb/>the mendacity leave has been granted to an extent so all<lb/>comprehensive and in this license in place of punishment reward<lb/><del>to <gap/></del> upon the most all comprehensive scale has been and <unclear>stands</unclear> <gap/></p> <p><note>7<lb/>Persons to whom<lb/>mendacity leave granted<lb/>1 Pursuers<lb/>2 Defendants<lb/>3 <sic>Attornies</sic><lb/>4 Advocates<lb/>5 Judges themselves</note></p> <p><del>1. To all parties in the</del></p> <p>Descriptions of persons to whom the mendacity leave has thus<lb/>been granted are these.</p><p>1. Parties on the pursuers side.  2. Parties on the defendants side. 3 Professional<lb/>assistants of the side of <sic>Attornies</sic> 4. Professional assistants of the order<lb/>of Advocates. 5. The Judges themselves. &#9758; Show how in each instance</p> <p>Of this error the mischievousness inserts in the support<lb/>given to a system that deleterious by the respect with which<lb/>the authors and supporters of the <hi rend="underline">mischief</hi> <add>the system of money exacting</add><lb/> depravity <del><sic>expence</sic> the</del>  their claim to this time <add>be</add> and are at<lb/>this time are regarded.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Novr. 23
Constitutional Code or Procedure

III
Ch. Securities against Evidence deception
§.10 Probative form estimated
Anglicé - English Judge
untrustworthy

To a cover to such matchless immorality depravity the cloak of relyance is assured
(What is visible to all eyes is that either those who pd to it have none of it,
or that if they have
any it is of no
use to their culture, and therefore not in any
included.
(Cause of the errors in the form sinister interests.

4
No vulgar error so
gross as that which
supposes Judge's object
to be minimization of
injustice

Of the whole list of vulgar errors few indeed are so mischievous
for so gross as that which supposes that in the mind on the part
of that class of those who are stiled Minister of Justice minimization
of injustice has been the end to which their labours devotions have been
directed. the to which the system of judicial procedure has in point
been directed: to minimization after substitute maximization
you will be near the truth.

5
Maximization of
injustice their object

That injustice might be maximized it has been their interest
that of the useless falsity — the great constraint of injustice, the frequency should
be maximized: the falsity itself maximized and thence moreover
so also the credence given to it.

6
To this end maximization
of falsity & deception

To this end it is that to so many various descriptions
of persons on this special occasion for this special purpose — the
license to committ utter judicial falshood with impunity — in one word
the mendacity leave has been granted to an extent so all
comprehensive and in this license in place of punishment reward
to upon the most all comprehensive scale has been and stands

7
Persons to whom
mendacity leave granted
1 Pursuers
2 Defendants
3 Attornies
4 Advocates
5 Judges themselves

1. To all parties in the

Descriptions of persons to whom the mendacity leave has thus
been granted are these.

1. Parties on the pursuers side. 2. Parties on the defendants side. 3 Professional
assistants of the side of Attornies 4. Professional assistants of the order
of Advocates. 5. The Judges themselves. ☞ Show how in each instance

Of this error the mischievousness inserts in the support
given to a system that deleterious by the respect with which
the authors and supporters of the mischief the system of money exacting
depravity expence the their claim to this time be and are at
this time are regarded.



Identifier: | JB/052/352/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1823-11-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-7

Box

052

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

352

Info in main headings field

constitutional code or procedure

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17025

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in