JB/052/355/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/355/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/052/355/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
<p>Abundant are <add>in detail</add> the instance <del>extreme</del> in the aggregate<lb/>
<p>Abundant are <add>in detail</add> the instance <del>extreme</del> in the aggregate<lb/>
wildly extensive are the instances in which evidence<lb/>
wildly extensive are the instances in which evidence<lb/>
amounting <del>to</del> scarcely to any the slightest presumption by<lb/>
amounting <del>to</del> scarcely to any the slightest presumption has<lb/>
by Judges been habitually acted in as conclusive: in every<lb/>
by Judges been habitually acted in as conclusive: in every<lb/>
instance without any<add>so much as </add> the most distant heart that was<lb/>
instance without any<add>so much as </add> the most distant limit that was<lb/>
done, <gap/> had <add>evidence for the ground or was altogether</add> <del>no warrant on ground whatsoever <gap/></del><lb/>
done, <gap/> had <add>evidence for the ground or was altogether</add> <del>no warrant on ground whatsoever <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>was</del> groundless.</p>
<del>was</del> groundless.</p>
Line 25: Line 25:
<p><gap/> Present to give the details under the head of 1. Insufficient<lb/>
<p><gap/> Present to give the details under the head of 1. Insufficient<lb/>
notices. 2. Presumption of consciousness of being in the wrong<lb/>
notices. 2. Presumption of consciousness of being in the wrong<lb/>
when <del><gap/></del> plaintiff as defendant fact to proceed in the course<lb/>
when <del>a party</del> plaintiff as defendant fail to proceed in the course<lb/>
respectively marked out for this side of the cause.</p>
respectively marked out for this side of the cause.</p>


Line 32: Line 32:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1827 July 29

Procedure Code Evidence
Conclusive
Anglici

Evidence inconclusive acted upon by Judges as conclusive

4
Evidence unclonclusive
acted upon by Judges
as conclusive

Abundant are in detail the instance extreme in the aggregate
wildly extensive are the instances in which evidence
amounting to scarcely to any the slightest presumption has
by Judges been habitually acted in as conclusive: in every
instance without anyso much as the most distant limit that was
done, had evidence for the ground or was altogether no warrant on ground whatsoever
was groundless.

Present to give the details under the head of 1. Insufficient
notices. 2. Presumption of consciousness of being in the wrong
when a party plaintiff as defendant fail to proceed in the course
respectively marked out for this side of the cause.




Identifier: | JB/052/355/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1827-07-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

4

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

355

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1826

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

17028

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in