JB/052/371/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/371/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
has been convicted of judicial falshood  criminal is culpable<lb/>
has been convicted of judicial falshood  criminal is culpable<lb/>
as say with evil consciousness or through culpable<lb/>
as say with evil consciousness or through culpable<lb/>
<gap/>. In such <gap/> use may be made if the<lb/>
<gap/>. In such <unclear>case</unclear> use may be made of the<lb/>
Judge <gap/> <gap/> use may be made of the record in which<lb/>
Judge <gap/> <gap/> use may be made of the record in which<lb/>
such conviction is recorded: and this without other expence<lb/>
such conviction is recorded: and this without other expence<lb/>
than the <del>trans<gap/></del><add>inspection</add> of the record in the spot in the pro<gap/><lb/>
than the <del>trans<gap/></del><add>inspection</add> of that record on the spot in the <unclear>procurement</unclear><lb/>
of it through the latter-post.</p>  
of it through the letter-post.</p>  
<note>6<lb/>
<note>6<lb/>
Where evidence contradictory<lb/>
Where evidence contradictory<lb/>
Line 47: Line 47:
the one or the other, if by a party in <add>in relation to one of the witness</add> either side - distinction<lb/>
the one or the other, if by a party in <add>in relation to one of the witness</add> either side - distinction<lb/>
is much that he is generally regarded as a person<lb/>
is much that he is generally regarded as a person<lb/>
in whose mendacity is habitual, <del>the</del> power to the Judge<lb/>
in whom mendacity is habitual, <del>the</del> power to the Judge<lb/>
to cause what evidence <del>tending to the</del><add>in</add> proof of <del>such</del><lb/>
to cause what evidence <del>tending to the</del><add>in</add> proof of <del>such</del><lb/>
the <del><gap/></del> untrustworthiness elledged.</p>
the <del><gap/></del> untrustworthiness elledged.</p>


<note>7<lb/>
<note>7<lb/>
<p>But in this case importance<lb/>
But in this case importance<lb/>
of the <add>subject matter</add> <del>evidence</del><lb/>
of the <add>subject matter</add> <del>evidence</del><lb/>
the guide as to admission<lb/>
the guide as to admission<lb/>
of character evidence</note><lb/>
of character evidence</note><lb/>
<p>Inst<gap/>tional</p>
<p>Inst<gap/>tional</p>
Art. 7. But in the exercise of this power, he<lb/>
<p>Art. 7. But in the exercise of this power, he<lb/>
will be guided by the consideration of the importance of the<lb/>
will be guided by the consideration of the importance of the<lb/>
subject matter in dispute compared with the expense <del><gap/></del><lb/>
subject matter in dispute compared with the expense <del><gap/></del><lb/>
Line 67: Line 67:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

18278. Nov.22 Feb.2

Procedure Penal Code. Ch. VII. Probation and Evidence
§.18 Character Evidence


4
Case III Extraneous
witness in the first
instance no character
evidence received

Enactive

Case the 3dthird that of an extraneous witnessexception excepted

Art.4. In the first instance, no personal evidence
shall will be receivedbe receivable in {Greek text} relation to the character of an
extraneous witness.

5
Case Exception where
proposed witness convicted
of culpable judicial
falsehood

Enactive

Art. 5. Exception is where the proposed witness
has been convicted of judicial falshood criminal is culpable
as say with evil consciousness or through culpable
. In such case use may be made of the
Judge use may be made of the record in which
such conviction is recorded: and this without other expence
than the transinspection of that record on the spot in the procurement
of it through the letter-post.

6
Where evidence contradictory
& habitual
mendacity of asserted
on either side character
evidence in proof
receivable

Enactive Instructional

Art.6. In the case where of two witnesses the
evidence being tiably contradictory, and the diaries
or to the question of fact depending on the evidence given to
the one or the other, if by a party in in relation to one of the witness either side - distinction
is much that he is generally regarded as a person
in whom mendacity is habitual, the power to the Judge
to cause what evidence tending to thein proof of such
the untrustworthiness elledged.

7
But in this case importance
of the subject matter evidence
the guide as to admission
of character evidence

Insttional

Art. 7. But in the exercise of this power, he
will be guided by the consideration of the importance of the
subject matter in dispute compared with the expense
delay and vexation res likely to result from the itation
of the mass of evidence elicitation of which is likely to be on sufficient ground
demanded



Identifier: | JB/052/371/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1828-02-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-7

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

371

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

enactive / enactive instructional / instructional

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1827

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

17044

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in