★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<head>Procedure <del>Penal</del> Code.</head> | <head>Procedure <del>Penal</del> Code.</head> | ||
<note>8<lb/> | <note>8<lb/> | ||
Exclusion of character<lb/> | |||
evidence<lb/> | evidence<lb/> | ||
Reason 1 The effect<lb/> | Reason 1 The effect<lb/> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<p>Art 8. Why in ordinary cases, put <add>in this case</add> an exclusion upon<lb/> | <p>Art 8. Why in ordinary cases, put <add>in this case</add> an exclusion upon<lb/> | ||
character evidence? Answer. Reason.</p> | character evidence? Answer. Reason.</p> | ||
1. For <add>the</add> reason <del><gap/></del> as per 11. the effect of any<lb/> | <p>1. For <add>the</add> reason <del><gap/></del> as per 11. the effect of any<lb/> | ||
evidence ass<gap/> <add>even of habitual</add> of mendacity will not be to produce<lb/> | evidence ass<gap/> <add>even of habitual</add> of mendacity will not be to produce<lb/> | ||
the exclusion of the individual in the capacity of a witness<lb/> | the exclusion of the individual in the capacity of a witness<lb/> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
circumstantial evidence</note><lb/> | circumstantial evidence</note><lb/> | ||
<p><del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative</hi></p> | <p><del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative</hi></p> | ||
Art.9.22. It follows | <p>Art.9.22. <del>It follows</del> For the species the utmost grand<lb/> | ||
that can be afforded will | that can be afforded will <add>can</add> not amount to any thing more than<lb/> | ||
or a weekly operating article of circumstantial evidence. It<lb/> | |||
follows not that because a man <add>his</add> attend wilful falshood<lb/> | |||
in cases where <del><gap/></del> in cases of incidently no punishment would<lb/> | |||
how he would in any thing like as in equal degree to<lb/> | |||
<gap/> so to do in a case in which by such mendacity to<lb/> | |||
would expose himself to the punishment appointed by the law<lb/> | |||
for that crown.</p> | |||
<note>10<lb/> | |||
Reason 3 11 Boundless<lb/> | |||
delay vexation & expence<lb/> | |||
the admission might be<lb/> | |||
made to produce</note><lb/> | |||
<p>Ratiocinative</p> | |||
<p>Art. 10.3. Boundless is the delay, expence and<lb/> | |||
vexation that might which it would be in the power of a<lb/> | |||
malaside litigant of an evil conscious is to <gap/> litigant<lb/> | |||
to necessitate of an unlimited <del>faculty</del><add>right</add> of calling in evidence<lb/> | |||
for this purpose were established.</p> | |||
<note>1. Boundless as to number<lb/> | |||
of witnesses called</note><lb/> | |||
<p>1. Boundless the number of witnesses whose evidence<lb/> | |||
<gap/> to called-in in the first instance: for the need would be<lb/> | |||
variable according to the importance of the matter in dispute, and <lb/> | |||
the difficulty attendant or the question of fact, with or without<lb/> | |||
other circumstance. Incompatible with any well grounded decision<lb/> | |||
on the question regarding evidence would be every attempt to<lb/> | |||
fix the allowable number of character-witnesses by general | |||
<unclear>rule</unclear>.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
18287 Novr. Feb.2
Ch. VII Probation & Evidence
S.18. Character Evidence
Procedure Penal Code.
8
Exclusion of character
evidence
Reason 1 The effect
not the of evidence of
habitual mendacity
not to produce exclusion
of a witness
Ratiocinative
Art 8. Why in ordinary cases, put in this case an exclusion upon
character evidence? Answer. Reason.
1. For the reason as per 11. the effect of any
evidence ass even of habitual of mendacity will not be to produce
the exclusion of the individual in the capacity of a witness
side effect that of producing an opinion in affirma of
a corresponding degree of comparative untrustworthiness
in the part of his personal evidence
9
Reason 2. Such evidence
only amounts to weak
circumstantial evidence
Ratiocinative
Art.9.22. It follows For the species the utmost grand
that can be afforded will can not amount to any thing more than
or a weekly operating article of circumstantial evidence. It
follows not that because a man his attend wilful falshood
in cases where in cases of incidently no punishment would
how he would in any thing like as in equal degree to
so to do in a case in which by such mendacity to
would expose himself to the punishment appointed by the law
for that crown.
10
Reason 3 11 Boundless
delay vexation & expence
the admission might be
made to produce
Ratiocinative
Art. 10.3. Boundless is the delay, expence and
vexation that might which it would be in the power of a
malaside litigant of an evil conscious is to litigant
to necessitate of an unlimited facultyright of calling in evidence
for this purpose were established.
1. Boundless as to number
of witnesses called
1. Boundless the number of witnesses whose evidence
to called-in in the first instance: for the need would be
variable according to the importance of the matter in dispute, and
the difficulty attendant or the question of fact, with or without
other circumstance. Incompatible with any well grounded decision
on the question regarding evidence would be every attempt to
fix the allowable number of character-witnesses by general
rule.
|
Identifier: | JB/052/372/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-02-02 |
8-10 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
372 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
ratiocinative / ratiocinative / ratiocinative |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d3 / e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1827 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1827 |
|||
|
17045 |
|||
