JB/052/386/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/386/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1826. July. 20</p>
 
<head>Procedure <del>Penal</del> Code.</head>
<note>Ch. Initiatory Application Litisna<lb/>
Judge Agenda consequential</note><lb/>
 
<note>11<lb/>
Importance for the<lb/>
purpose of proposed<lb/>
evidence furnishers<lb/>
evidence</note><lb/>
 
<p>Art. To this purpose <add>a circumstance</add> <del>it</del> will be preeminently material will<lb/>
<del>whether with relation to <gap/></del> to the importance of the proposed evidence<lb/>
furnishers evidence with relation to the event of the Suit. <del>Of</del> <add>The case in which</add> this importance<lb/>
<add>will be in</add> the highest degree is that where for the proof of the <add>supposed</add> fact<lb/>
<del>there</del> the nature of the case <del>has</del> does not at the time in question afford<lb/>
any evidence other than  his. 2. Next came that in which in<lb/>
interest or supposed affection the <del><gap/></del> supposed Evidence holder and<lb/>
proposed Evidence furnisher is <del><gap/></del> apprehended to be adverse to<lb/>
the Pursuer person or to this his demand</p>
<note>12<lb/>
The greater the number<lb/>
of material evidence <lb/>
furnishers the less need <lb/>
of vexatious modes of<lb/>
procurement</note><lb/>
<p>The greater the number of persons capable of furnishing<lb/>
the evidence required, and the more material the evidence in<lb/>
the instance of each the less will be the need of <del>thus procuring their</del><lb/>
<del>evidence</del> the taking the more or less <unclear>vexatious</unclear> course for the procurement<lb/>
of the evidence respectively</p>
<note>13<lb/>
Out off any number of<lb/>
evidence furnishers<lb/>
Judge may examine<lb/>
any less number if <lb/>
sufficient</note><lb/>
<p>For the more effectual evidence of needless <add>delay so</add> vexation and<lb/>
expence, out of a <add>the whole</add> number of supposed Evidence holders proposed<lb/>
to him the Judge may take for examination any <add>in the first instance</add> <del>part</del> lesser<lb/>
number, reserving to himself the power of doing the like in the case<lb/>
of any additional number: and this not only at a time <gap/><lb/>
to that of the Defendants <add>first response</add> answer is <del>personal</del> attendance as the<lb/>
case may be but one at a time pretence not only to <unclear>that of</unclear><lb/>
the defendants response or attendance but to the time of his having<lb/>
furnished evidence from extraneous and non-litigant witnesses.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. July. 20

Procedure Penal Code. Ch. Initiatory Application Litisna
Judge Agenda consequential

11
Importance for the
purpose of proposed
evidence furnishers
evidence

Art. To this purpose a circumstance it will be preeminently material will
whether with relation to to the importance of the proposed evidence
furnishers evidence with relation to the event of the Suit. Of The case in which this importance
will be in the highest degree is that where for the proof of the supposed fact
there the nature of the case has does not at the time in question afford
any evidence other than his. 2. Next came that in which in
interest or supposed affection the supposed Evidence holder and
proposed Evidence furnisher is apprehended to be adverse to
the Pursuer person or to this his demand

12
The greater the number
of material evidence
furnishers the less need
of vexatious modes of
procurement

The greater the number of persons capable of furnishing
the evidence required, and the more material the evidence in
the instance of each the less will be the need of thus procuring their
evidence the taking the more or less vexatious course for the procurement
of the evidence respectively

13
Out off any number of
evidence furnishers
Judge may examine
any less number if
sufficient

For the more effectual evidence of needless delay so vexation and
expence, out of a the whole number of supposed Evidence holders proposed
to him the Judge may take for examination any in the first instance part lesser
number, reserving to himself the power of doing the like in the case
of any additional number: and this not only at a time
to that of the Defendants first response answer is personal attendance as the
case may be but one at a time pretence not only to that of
the defendants response or attendance but to the time of his having
furnished evidence from extraneous and non-litigant witnesses.




Identifier: | JB/052/386/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1826-07-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-13

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

386

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17059

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in