JB/075/029/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/075/029/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/075/029/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/075/029/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/075/029/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1828 July 13<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Real Property</head><note><!-- pencil -->&sect;. 5. Proper Object or End</note></p>
 
<p>Now then so it is, which of these two descriptions<lb/>
 
of persons <add>compared with one another</add> the interests are in a state of direction opposition<lb/>
 
the one to the other:  in so much that whatsoever<lb/>
is desirable to the one is <del>the reverse</del> not desirable but the<lb/>
reverse of desirable to the other.</p>
<p>First then as to the objects or say ends in view<lb/>
which are not with reference to these same "methods and<lb/>
"forms", or say operations and written <unclear>written</unclear> instruments.</p>
<p>In my view of the matter, these may <del>be</del> in<lb/>
brief be thus enumerated.</p>
<p>1.  All <del>comprehensive <gap/> and</del> Main end<lb/>
Giving execution and effect to all such proposed<lb/>
obligatory transactions.  Consequences and engagements included<lb/>
in relation to which the Law meaning the<lb/>
ruling powers or say constituting authorities shall have<lb/>
<del>thought fit</del> been desirous to give binding force,<lb/>
in other words desirous that such binding force should<lb/>
be given.</p>
<p>2.  Collateral ends <add>Subordinate end or ends</add>, exclusion of all doubt<lb/>
thence of uncertainty in relation to these topics <add>or say questions</add> in the<lb/>
determination eventually place <del>by the one</del> in relation to<lb/>
which by the competent authorities that is to say the<lb/>
Judges <add>it</add> will depend whether execution and effect shall <add>will eventually</add><lb/>
be given to the respective instruments.</p>
<p>These topics or say questions <del>are the</del> <add>the</add> subject matters<lb/>
are</p>
<p>1.  The <add>intended</add> import of the instrument in question – which is throughout.</p>
<p>2.  Its <add>intended</add> import being ascertained is the <del>disposition</del> <add>arrangement</add> made by the<lb/>
instrument of the number of those to which it is the intention<lb/>
of the constituted authorities that binding force should be given.</p>
<p>3.  Its intended import being ascertained, that is to say the<lb/>
import intended by the draughtsman was it the intent of the<lb/>
several <del>parties <gap/></del> persons named as parties <del>to give</del> their<lb/>
respective consent should be considered as thereto given.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:57, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1828 July 13
Real Property§. 5. Proper Object or End

Now then so it is, which of these two descriptions
of persons compared with one another the interests are in a state of direction opposition
the one to the other: in so much that whatsoever
is desirable to the one is the reverse not desirable but the
reverse of desirable to the other.

First then as to the objects or say ends in view
which are not with reference to these same "methods and
"forms", or say operations and written written instruments.

In my view of the matter, these may be in
brief be thus enumerated.

1. All comprehensive and Main end
Giving execution and effect to all such proposed
obligatory transactions. Consequences and engagements included
in relation to which the Law meaning the
ruling powers or say constituting authorities shall have
thought fit been desirous to give binding force,
in other words desirous that such binding force should
be given.

2. Collateral ends Subordinate end or ends, exclusion of all doubt
thence of uncertainty in relation to these topics or say questions in the
determination eventually place by the one in relation to
which by the competent authorities that is to say the
Judges it will depend whether execution and effect shall will eventually
be given to the respective instruments.

These topics or say questions are the the subject matters
are

1. The intended import of the instrument in question – which is throughout.

2. Its intended import being ascertained is the disposition arrangement made by the
instrument of the number of those to which it is the intention
of the constituted authorities that binding force should be given.

3. Its intended import being ascertained, that is to say the
import intended by the draughtsman was it the intent of the
several parties persons named as parties to give their
respective consent should be considered as thereto given.


Identifier: | JB/075/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 75.

Date_1

1828-07-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

075

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

029

Info in main headings field

real property

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d11 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

24483

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in