JB/023/007/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/023/007/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/023/007/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/023/007/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1830. Jan. 1.  <del>1928 De.</del><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>U.S.</head></p>
 
<p>or 1.<lb/>
 
II.  Arrangements excluded.<lb/>
 
Reasons as in the case of<lb/>
Institutions<lb/>
1.  Exclusion from Office.<lb/>
Ground supposed inaptitude<lb/>
by want of age –<lb/>
Instances, below.</p>
<p>or 2.<lb/>
2.  D<hi rend="superscript">o,</hi> Grounds, supposed inaptitude<lb/>
by foreignership –<lb/>
Instances, below.</p>
<p>or 3.<lb/>
3.  To some Executive<lb/>
functionary,<lb/>
negative on proceedings,<lb/>
universal or special,<lb/>
of Legislative or Executive.<lb/>
Instances see in<lb/>
Greek Provincial Constitution.</p>
<p>or 4.<lb/>
4.  Extra majority rendered<lb/>
necessary to validity –<lb/>
Instances, below.</p>
<p>or 5.<lb/>
5.  For burthensome offices<lb/>
superfluous numbers.<lb/>
Instance – In English Juries,<lb/>
attendants 48:<lb/>
serving in each cause,<lb/>
12.</p>
<pb/>
<p>or 1.<lb/>
Reasons for the exclusion<lb/>
1.  In limited Monarchy<lb/>
case see Ch. 1. Constitution.<lb/>
General result.  Monarch's<lb/>
interests repugnant to<lb/>
universal d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
Practice, universally<lb/>
accordant.</p>
<p>or 2.<lb/>
2.  Aristocracy, case:<lb/>
without, with, or under<lb/>
a Monarch.<lb/>
Reasons correspondent.</p>
<p>or 3.<lb/>
3.  Commonwealth –<lb/>
To a body of Peoples immediate<lb/>
added a d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of unimmediate<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
Difference between this<lb/>
case and cases 1 and 2.<lb/>
1.  There, interest meant to<lb/>
be served d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
hostile to universal d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> –<lb/>
here identical.<lb/>
2.  There, exclusion <del><gap/></del><lb/>
impossible, here easy.<lb/>
Will take place of course<lb/>
whenever greatest number<lb/>
please.</p>
<p>or 4.<lb/>
Incongruity here.<lb/>
1.  Supposition proceeded<lb/>
upon, in ease of immediate<lb/>
Representatives<lb/>
aptitude maximized.</p>
<p>For frustrating for ever<lb/>
or a time their will-power<lb/>
given to another<lb/>
body of inferior aptitude.</p>
<p>If it afforded equal<lb/>
promise of equal aptitude<lb/>
in other points, the<lb/>
smallness of its number<lb/>
should give it the<lb/>
preference.  Dispatch<lb/>
greater;  expense of pay,<lb/>
less.</p>
<pb/>
<p>False securities<lb/>
1.  for immaturity of age.</p>
<p>Exclusion better for<lb/>
over maturity than<lb/>
for immaturity.</p>
<p>The older they grow<lb/>
the stronger the preponderance<lb/>
of self-regarding<lb/>
over all embracing<lb/>
social interest.</p>
<p>By sinister interest<lb/>
the exclusion for<lb/>
immaturity suggested.</p>
<p>Nugatory securities.<lb/>
1.  Antecedent to Office.<lb/>
2.  During Office.</p>
<p>Nugatory Security.<lb/>
1.  Promissory oaths.<lb/>
2.  Declaration of opinion.<lb/>
3.  Exclusion on grounds of<lb/>
inaptitude having no<lb/>
relation to the functions<lb/>
required.<lb/>
4.  Length of time determinate.<lb/>
5.  Multitude of sharers.<lb/>
6.  Number <del>of</del> greater<lb/>
than a majority<lb/>
made requisite.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:57, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1830. Jan. 1. 1928 De.
U.S.

or 1.
II. Arrangements excluded.
Reasons as in the case of
Institutions
1. Exclusion from Office.
Ground supposed inaptitude
by want of age –
Instances, below.

or 2.
2. Do, Grounds, supposed inaptitude
by foreignership –
Instances, below.

or 3.
3. To some Executive
functionary,
negative on proceedings,
universal or special,
of Legislative or Executive.
Instances see in
Greek Provincial Constitution.

or 4.
4. Extra majority rendered
necessary to validity –
Instances, below.

or 5.
5. For burthensome offices
superfluous numbers.
Instance – In English Juries,
attendants 48:
serving in each cause,
12.


---page break---

or 1.
Reasons for the exclusion
1. In limited Monarchy
case see Ch. 1. Constitution.
General result. Monarch's
interests repugnant to
universal do.
Practice, universally
accordant.

or 2.
2. Aristocracy, case:
without, with, or under
a Monarch.
Reasons correspondent.

or 3.
3. Commonwealth –
To a body of Peoples immediate
added a do. of unimmediate
do.
Difference between this
case and cases 1 and 2.
1. There, interest meant to
be served do.
hostile to universal do.
here identical.
2. There, exclusion
impossible, here easy.
Will take place of course
whenever greatest number
please.

or 4.
Incongruity here.
1. Supposition proceeded
upon, in ease of immediate
Representatives
aptitude maximized.

For frustrating for ever
or a time their will-power
given to another
body of inferior aptitude.

If it afforded equal
promise of equal aptitude
in other points, the
smallness of its number
should give it the
preference. Dispatch
greater; expense of pay,
less.


---page break---

False securities
1. for immaturity of age.

Exclusion better for
over maturity than
for immaturity.

The older they grow
the stronger the preponderance
of self-regarding
over all embracing
social interest.

By sinister interest
the exclusion for
immaturity suggested.

Nugatory securities.
1. Antecedent to Office.
2. During Office.

Nugatory Security.
1. Promissory oaths.
2. Declaration of opinion.
3. Exclusion on grounds of
inaptitude having no
relation to the functions
required.
4. Length of time determinate.
5. Multitude of sharers.
6. Number of greater
than a majority
made requisite.


Identifier: | JB/023/007/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 23.

Date_1

1830-01-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 5, or 1- or 4

Box

023

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

007

Info in main headings field

const. code us

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f2

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

7878

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in