JB/058/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/058/021/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/021/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/021/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/021/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->29 April 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Compared with the whole or with the remainder, a part of any<lb/>
 
<add>work or</add> system of operations can not but have the same end <add>be directed or at least require to be directed to one view</add>.  The end<lb/>
 
therefore, with its immediate relations and dependencies – the common<lb/>
end will be a topic appertaining in common to the topics <add>subject</add><lb/>
to the two works – a work <add>the rationale</add> on the subject of evidence and a work <add>the rationale</add><lb/>
on the subject of procedure.  <add>To</add> This part therefore <del>could not<lb/>
be refused</del> a place could not be refused in the present work:  it<lb/>
could not be posted off to any other <add>eventually succeeding one publication</add>.</p>
<p>Of <del>parts so</del> <add>two</add> works so intrinsically connected, it cannot<lb/>
however be expected than in either all mention <add>a reference</add> should be<lb/>
avoided of <add>to</add> the other.  In and between all branches of science,<lb/>
lines of demarcation, such are the <unclear>ingenue</unclear> of human weakness<lb/>
must be drawn, but it is seldom indeed that they can either<lb/>
be drawn straight in the first instance, or secured against encroachments<lb/>
on either side.</p>
<p>To Evidence will be referred what <unclear>concerns</unclear> the admission<lb/>
or exclusion, the apprehension, of testimonial and other evidence<lb/>
and the <gap/>, against such <add>the</add> deceptions of which it is <add>to be it</add> apt<lb/>
to be productive.  To procedure, the arrangements <add>operations</add> necessary<lb/>
and proper to <del>be</del> employed <add><gap/> to</add> for the obtainment of it.  In<lb/>
a work of evidence accordingly the source of evidence what<lb/>
source it be, person, thing, <unclear>with</unclear> document is supposed to<lb/>
be forthcoming:  but the quality of it – the weight it is entitled<lb/>
to act with on the scale, depends too much on the mode <add>operations</add> in<lb/>
which it is extracted from that source, to admitt of <add>posting off</add> the theory <add>rationale</add><lb/>
of those operations to any work<add>what concerns the <unclear>device</unclear></add> the rationale of those operations.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:59, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

29 April 1805
Evidence

Compared with the whole or with the remainder, a part of any
work or system of operations can not but have the same end be directed or at least require to be directed to one view. The end
therefore, with its immediate relations and dependencies – the common
end will be a topic appertaining in common to the topics subject
to the two works – a work the rationale on the subject of evidence and a work the rationale
on the subject of procedure. To This part therefore could not
be refused
a place could not be refused in the present work: it
could not be posted off to any other eventually succeeding one publication.

Of parts so two works so intrinsically connected, it cannot
however be expected than in either all mention a reference should be
avoided of to the other. In and between all branches of science,
lines of demarcation, such are the ingenue of human weakness
must be drawn, but it is seldom indeed that they can either
be drawn straight in the first instance, or secured against encroachments
on either side.

To Evidence will be referred what concerns the admission
or exclusion, the apprehension, of testimonial and other evidence
and the , against such the deceptions of which it is to be it apt
to be productive. To procedure, the arrangements operations necessary
and proper to be employed to for the obtainment of it. In
a work of evidence accordingly the source of evidence what
source it be, person, thing, with document is supposed to
be forthcoming: but the quality of it – the weight it is entitled
to act with on the scale, depends too much on the mode operations in
which it is extracted from that source, to admitt of posting off the theory rationale
of those operations to any workwhat concerns the device the rationale of those operations.


Identifier: | JB/058/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-04-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-6

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18690

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in