JB/058/056/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/058/056/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/056/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/056/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>We are now prepared for the explanation <add>language to view narration and denomination</add> of the three <del>principal</del><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
particular <add>direct</add> ends, the three principal branches of the <del>general</del> <add>object</add><lb/>
 
<del>end of paradox</del> already described under the name of the<lb/>
 
general direct end of <add>the system of</add> procedure.</p>
 
<p>1.  Punishment, though <add>if used in, and by</add> by itself an evil, <del>per</del> is not incapable<lb/>
of producing nor does it fail of sometimes producing,<lb/>
a clear ballance of good, viz: by the <add>subsequent</add> prevention of offences,
and <add>thence</add> consequently of the mischief of offences, of the same sort<lb/>
as the individual act of delinquency to which in each instance<lb/>
it is applied.  In so far as it is <add>thus becomes</add> a good – <del>in so far<lb/>
as it has the</del> by the act by which it is administered, a<lb/>
service is rendered, and in so far as the rendering of that<lb/>
service is prescribed <add>and predicted</add> by <del>the</del> substantive law it may be said<lb/>
to be <hi rend="underline"><unclear>due</unclear></hi>.  First particular direct end <add>or object, and functions or justice</add> of procedure application <add>providing for the<lb/>
administration</add> of punishment when due.</p>
<p>First principal branch of the system of procedure – the<lb/>
penal branch.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:59, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

We are now prepared for the explanation language to view narration and denomination of the three principal
particular direct ends, the three principal branches of the general object
end of paradox already described under the name of the
general direct end of the system of procedure.

1. Punishment, though if used in, and by by itself an evil, per is not incapable
of producing nor does it fail of sometimes producing,
a clear ballance of good, viz: by the subsequent prevention of offences, and thence consequently of the mischief of offences, of the same sort
as the individual act of delinquency to which in each instance
it is applied. In so far as it is thus becomes a good – in so far
as it has the
by the act by which it is administered, a
service is rendered, and in so far as the rendering of that
service is prescribed and predicted by the substantive law it may be said
to be due. First particular direct end or object, and functions or justice of procedure application providing for the
administration
of punishment when due.

First principal branch of the system of procedure – the
penal branch.


Identifier: | JB/058/056/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-04-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

056

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18725

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in