JB/058/070/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/058/070/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/070/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/070/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->3 May 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p><head>&sect;.  Limitations necessary to the description of these evils</head></p>
 
<p>First incidental collateral end – avoidance of vexation<lb/>
 
understand where unnecessary is preponderant.</p>
<p><add>Meantime</add> Of these several evils there is not one which, in<lb/>
some quantity or other is not inseparably attached to the system<lb/>
of procedure – to every suit <del>which can</del> without exception<lb/>
to which it can happen to be carried on <del><gap/></del> under the <add>set system of</add> arrangements<lb/>
of which that system is composed.  To propose<lb/>
for an end of procedure simply and <gap/> – to propose<lb/>
in that character, without limitation – the compleat avoidance<lb/>
of vexation, of expence, of delay – would be to propose<lb/>
as an object of endeavour – <del>an object</del> <add>a good –</add> the attainment of which<lb/>
is upon the face of it impossible.  Important therefore as it <add>Much therefore as it is<lb/>
to be wished</add> <hi rend="underline">is</hi> that those evils should as much as possible be avoided and<lb/>
averted, it is not till after some limitation has been set to<lb/>
the description of them that the avoidance of them can be stated<lb/>
as a rational object of human endeavour <add>legislative industry</add>.</p>
<p>For the description of this limitation two considerations present<lb/>
themselves.</p>
<p>Suppose the evil in question, <del>not</del> suppose it either in the<lb/>
whole, or in any part of it, not <hi rend="underline">necessary</hi> to the production of<lb/>
good – in the pursuit of which it is liable to be produced:  it<lb/>
is then so much pure evil:  and in that character the possibility<lb/>
as well as propriety of endeavouring to exclude it, follows of<lb/>
course.  First limitation <del>to</del> <add><del>infor</del> informing</add> the description of the evil <add>to be avoided</add>;  <del><gap/></del> <add>the time</add><lb/>
if taken, applied by the epithet <hi rend="underline">unnecessary</hi>:  instead of vexation<lb/>
simply, <add><del>Suppose</del></add> say vexation unnecessary, vexation where unnecessary: –<lb/>
and so of the rest.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:00, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

3 May 1805
Evidence

§. Limitations necessary to the description of these evils

First incidental collateral end – avoidance of vexation
understand where unnecessary is preponderant.

Meantime Of these several evils there is not one which, in
some quantity or other is not inseparably attached to the system
of procedure – to every suit which can without exception
to which it can happen to be carried on under the set system of arrangements
of which that system is composed. To propose
for an end of procedure simply and – to propose
in that character, without limitation – the compleat avoidance
of vexation, of expence, of delay – would be to propose
as an object of endeavour – an object a good – the attainment of which
is upon the face of it impossible. Important therefore as it Much therefore as it is
to be wished
is that those evils should as much as possible be avoided and
averted, it is not till after some limitation has been set to
the description of them that the avoidance of them can be stated
as a rational object of human endeavour legislative industry.

For the description of this limitation two considerations present
themselves.

Suppose the evil in question, not suppose it either in the
whole, or in any part of it, not necessary to the production of
good – in the pursuit of which it is liable to be produced: it
is then so much pure evil: and in that character the possibility
as well as propriety of endeavouring to exclude it, follows of
course. First limitation to infor informing the description of the evil to be avoided; the time
if taken, applied by the epithet unnecessary: instead of vexation
simply, Suppose say vexation unnecessary, vexation where unnecessary: –
and so of the rest.


Identifier: | JB/058/070/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-05-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

7

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

070

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18739

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in