JB/058/096/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/058/096/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/096/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/096/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/096/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->16 July 1804<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure &amp; Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>5.  On the part of the Judge, <del>if a single person</del> <add>in the case of a single Judge,</add> committing<lb/>
 
to writing memorials of the authorities so referred to, and of the<lb/>
 
references <add>argument</add> deduced from them in the way of argument on<lb/>
both sides.</p>
<p>6.  Recapitulating the substance of the arguments so exhibited.</p>
<p>7.  Drawing the ultimate conclusion from the arguments so<lb/>
exhibited on both sides, and pronouncing the decision or say<lb/>
judgment suggested by that conclusion.</p>
<p>8.  In the case of divers Judges, repetition of the operations<lb/>
N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 5, 6 and 7, or any one <del>of</del> or two of them, by the whole<lb/>
or any other inferior numbers of <del>the</del> <add>such</add> Judges beyond one.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:00, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

16 July 1804
Procedure & Evidence

5. On the part of the Judge, if a single person in the case of a single Judge, committing
to writing memorials of the authorities so referred to, and of the
references argument deduced from them in the way of argument on
both sides.

6. Recapitulating the substance of the arguments so exhibited.

7. Drawing the ultimate conclusion from the arguments so
exhibited on both sides, and pronouncing the decision or say
judgment suggested by that conclusion.

8. In the case of divers Judges, repetition of the operations
No 5, 6 and 7, or any one of or two of them, by the whole
or any other inferior numbers of the such Judges beyond one.


Identifier: | JB/058/096/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1804-07-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

6 continued

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

096

Info in main headings field

procedure & evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18765

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in