★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/058/106/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
Auto approved |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/106/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/058/106/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->14 May 1805<lb/> | |||
<head>Evidence</head></p> | |||
<p>Compared with delay, its seeming antagonist <add>correlative opposite</add> <hi rend="underline">precipitation</hi>, will<lb/> | |||
be found altogether disparate and anomalous. Besides the effects,<lb/> | |||
it agrees not <add>with it</add> so much as in respect of the persons chargeable<lb/> | |||
as authors. Delay, unnecessary or preponderant delay, is<lb/> | |||
at least as liable to be the act and fault of the party, or of the<lb/> | |||
Judge. Precipitation, considered as a fault by <add>an act from</add> which any<lb/> | |||
person other than the agent is liable <add>exposed</add> to suffer injury, can not<lb/> | |||
be the act of any person but the Judge or his subordinates.<lb/> | |||
By precipitation, if <add>the conduct of</add> either party is chargeable with it, it is<lb/> | |||
the <del>agent</del> <add>precipitate party</add> himself that suffers by it, not his adversary,<lb/> | |||
unless <add>it be by the fault</add> by the default of the Judge.</p> | |||
<p>Precipitation then, <add>supposing it to take place,</add> is peculiarly <add>more particularly</add> if not exclusively<lb/> | |||
the fault of the Jude: and when it does take place, of what<lb/> | |||
<unclear>reaction</unclear> is the mischief caused by it? It is the mischief of<lb/> | |||
misdecision – <add>the <del>coll</del> ultimate collateral evil incident to procedure –</add> in one or other of its three <del><gap/></del> branches: for<lb/> | |||
administration of punishment where undue, collation of rights (thence<lb/> | |||
imposition of corresponding obligations) where undue – administration<lb/> | |||
of satisfaction, (with its correspondent obligations) where undue.</p> | |||
<p>But through the medium of precipitation may it not happen<lb/> | |||
to the Judge to produce <add>unnecessary or preponderant</add> vexation? Yes: – <del>and</del> <add>or</add> expence?<lb/> | |||
Yes: – <del>and</del> yes, and even delay. But in each of these<lb/> | |||
cases whatever may be the mischief produced, it is the mischief<lb/> | |||
of vexation, the mischief of expence, or the mischief of delay:<lb/> | |||
distinct from <add>over and above</add> those mischiefs respectively, precipitation is not productive<lb/> | |||
of any sort of mischief.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
14 May 1805
Evidence
Compared with delay, its seeming antagonist correlative opposite precipitation, will
be found altogether disparate and anomalous. Besides the effects,
it agrees not with it so much as in respect of the persons chargeable
as authors. Delay, unnecessary or preponderant delay, is
at least as liable to be the act and fault of the party, or of the
Judge. Precipitation, considered as a fault by an act from which any
person other than the agent is liable exposed to suffer injury, can not
be the act of any person but the Judge or his subordinates.
By precipitation, if the conduct of either party is chargeable with it, it is
the agent precipitate party himself that suffers by it, not his adversary,
unless it be by the fault by the default of the Judge.
Precipitation then, supposing it to take place, is peculiarly more particularly if not exclusively
the fault of the Jude: and when it does take place, of what
reaction is the mischief caused by it? It is the mischief of
misdecision – the coll ultimate collateral evil incident to procedure – in one or other of its three branches: for
administration of punishment where undue, collation of rights (thence
imposition of corresponding obligations) where undue – administration
of satisfaction, (with its correspondent obligations) where undue.
But through the medium of precipitation may it not happen
to the Judge to produce unnecessary or preponderant vexation? Yes: – and or expence?
Yes: – and yes, and even delay. But in each of these
cases whatever may be the mischief produced, it is the mischief
of vexation, the mischief of expence, or the mischief of delay:
distinct from over and above those mischiefs respectively, precipitation is not productive
of any sort of mischief.
Identifier: | JB/058/106/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1805-05-14 |
|||
058 |
evidence |
||
106 |
evidence |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
18775 |
|||