JB/058/113/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/113/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/113/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/113/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/113/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->5 May 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Examples of this sort of end may be met with in but too<lb/>
 
great abundance in almost every system of established procedure:<lb/>
 
the difficulty is rather how to avoid meeting with.  Of this<lb/>
sort are <add>afforded by a great part of</add> all those propositions with which under the name<lb/>
of maxims or principles books of practical <add>established law</add> so much<lb/>
abound.</p>
<p>&#9758; Give a few from <unclear>Loft's</unclear> <hi rend="underline"><gap/> Juries</hi>.</p>
<p><add>The mode of classification here pursued</add> This classification is not altogether unanalogous to that<lb/>
which <del>mere</del> in another work may have been observed as<lb/>
<add>to have been brought to view as applicable</add> applied to the contents of a body of <del>substantive</del> law in<lb/>
general or of the substantive branch of it in particular.<lb/>
Legitimate end, the principle of utility:  spurious end,<lb/>
the principle of asceticism, which is opposite to it <add>the former the other</add>, the<lb/>
principle of caprice, which when applied to the choice<lb/>
and application of the maker of <add>reward and</add> punishment, or <add>that of</add> reward <del><gap/></del><lb/>
has been termed the principle of <hi rend="underline">sympathy and antipathy</hi>, not<lb/>
uniformly opposite to the principle of utility, but independent<lb/>
of it, and on that account liable occasionally to run<lb/>
counter to it.  <add>To so many modifications of this, considered </add> This as applied to substantive, correspond <del>so <gap/></del> the several maxims or principles –<lb/>
maxims constituted of so many <del>capr</del><add><del>the</del> observance of which is</add> of the ends here called<lb/>
capricious ends, as applied to adjective law.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:00, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

5 May 1805
Evidence

Examples of this sort of end may be met with in but too
great abundance in almost every system of established procedure:
the difficulty is rather how to avoid meeting with. Of this
sort are afforded by a great part of all those propositions with which under the name
of maxims or principles books of practical established law so much
abound.

☞ Give a few from Loft's Juries.

The mode of classification here pursued This classification is not altogether unanalogous to that
which mere in another work may have been observed as
to have been brought to view as applicable applied to the contents of a body of substantive law in
general or of the substantive branch of it in particular.
Legitimate end, the principle of utility: spurious end,
the principle of asceticism, which is opposite to it the former the other, the
principle of caprice, which when applied to the choice
and application of the maker of reward and punishment, or that of reward
has been termed the principle of sympathy and antipathy, not
uniformly opposite to the principle of utility, but independent
of it, and on that account liable occasionally to run
counter to it. To so many modifications of this, considered This as applied to substantive, correspond so the several maxims or principles –
maxims constituted of so many caprthe observance of which is of the ends here called
capricious ends, as applied to adjective law.


Identifier: | JB/058/113/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-05-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

113

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18782

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in