JB/058/267/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/267/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/267/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/267/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->24 March 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>By a sort of <add>loose</add> preconception, and antecedently to any close investigation<lb/>
 
of the subject, it will be understood <add>conceived</add> at half a glance, that<lb/>
 
in comparison of the first mode, the second is but a makeshift,<lb/>
and <del>the</del> again the third in comparison of the second:  and<lb/>
that in proportion <del>as</del> to their deviation from the all comprehensive<lb/>
and all-efficient simplicity of the first, the two others have <add>been</add> but<lb/>
<add>divested of</add> a portion of their efficiency with regard to the ends of judicature:<lb/>
that in the instance of the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> a <unclear>certainty</unclear> of additional delay vexation<lb/>
and expence, together with a chance of misdecision, over and<lb/>
above what <add>any that</add> have place in the first:  and that in the instance of<lb/>
the third, the diminution of the probability <add>securities</add> of right decision – in other<lb/>
words the encrease of the probability of misdecision is the certain <add>result</add>, and<lb/>
the encrease of the quantum of delay vexation and expence, a <add>further</add> contingent,<lb/>
but <add>yet</add> natural enough and but too probable.</p>
<p>In these deviations from the present standard <add>model</add> we see the result<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">necessity</hi>, as above explained <add>particularized</add>, and we see all the deviations<lb/>
<add>that can vouch necessary for their warrant and sufficient cause</add> that <del>have</del> are capable of being justified on that ground, all the<lb/>
observations that in any way can be shewn to be subservient to<lb/>
the ends of justice – <add>to</add> the legitimate ends of judicature.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:00, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

24 March 1805
Evidence

By a sort of loose preconception, and antecedently to any close investigation
of the subject, it will be understood conceived at half a glance, that
in comparison of the first mode, the second is but a makeshift,
and the again the third in comparison of the second: and
that in proportion as to their deviation from the all comprehensive
and all-efficient simplicity of the first, the two others have been but
divested of a portion of their efficiency with regard to the ends of judicature:
that in the instance of the 2d a certainty of additional delay vexation
and expence, together with a chance of misdecision, over and
above what any that have place in the first: and that in the instance of
the third, the diminution of the probability securities of right decision – in other
words the encrease of the probability of misdecision is the certain result, and
the encrease of the quantum of delay vexation and expence, a further contingent,
but yet natural enough and but too probable.

In these deviations from the present standard model we see the result
of necessity, as above explained particularized, and we see all the deviations
that can vouch necessary for their warrant and sufficient cause that have are capable of being justified on that ground, all the
observations that in any way can be shewn to be subservient to
the ends of justice – to the legitimate ends of judicature.


Identifier: | JB/058/267/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-03-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-8

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

267

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d9 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18936

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in