JB/058/316/001

Click Here To Edit

8 April 1803
Evidence

Had the interest of the organizer of the technical system
the man of law, coincided so exactly with that of the members
of the political community family in the character of suitors, without
if – or without sitting and stopping to look for any such exact and
mathematical coincidence, had it agreed with that degree
of agreement exactness with which that of the head of a domestic family
agrees with that of the whole family taken in the aggregate,
in either case the technical system actually established would
have been as no less conformable and conducive to the ends of justice than the
natural: or rather there wold have been as such technical no such system as the technical would ever
have been established have come into existence. system at all established. The system established would have
been the domestic system: with only such enlargements and additions,
as were obvious to common sense, being individual and
and indicated by the encreased largeness of of the scale. In a
word it would have been th what as will be seen further on the summary actually
is, drawn out only into length and extended, in each particular instance
to the measure extent indicated in that instance by such of the
natural and necessary causes of complication and delay as
happened to attends upon that case.+ + See the Paper.

Unfortunately the interest of the man of law is rarely
coincident with, and in many points directly opposed to the
interests of the suitors, and consequently to the interests of justice.
By the natural system of procedure the interests of the suitors would
have indeed been promoted provided for, and that most perfectly, but his own interest
but imperfectly: very imperfectly indeed in comparison with that
degree of perfection, in which they are provided for at present: and to
that and disagreement the suitor is indebted, as will be seen. For in
the infinitely diversified
differences attending the
technical is distinguished
from the natural system
of procedure.

Identifier: | JB/058/316/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.
Date_1	1805-04-08	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-2
Box	058	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	316	Info in main headings field	evidence
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d2 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	18985
Box Contents