★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/359/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/058/359/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->30 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1805<lb/> | |||
<head>Evidence</head></p> | |||
<p>In marking out the course taken under the English System <add>in its various principal <gap/> in some of its broadest lines in England</add><lb/> | |||
<add>of English origin</add> in relation to the operation in question – viz: the receipt<lb/> | |||
and extraction of testimony, I shall begin with that <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
mode of procedure which <unclear>we</unclear> consider exactly or <add>at least</add> comes<lb/> | |||
nearest to a coincidence with the <del>mode <add>plan</add></del> pattern exhibited<lb/> | |||
by the above rules. I shall then exhibit in their order<lb/> | |||
the several ulterior variations, placing first those in which the<lb/> | |||
aberration is least important; and bringing successively to view<lb/> | |||
<del>their</del> the instances in which it is wider and wider <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add><lb/> | |||
mode pursued more and more vitious, and <add>defective, abundant in imperfection</add><lb/> | |||
<del>consequently</del> the means employed <add><gap/></add> were <del>next</del> worse adapted<lb/> | |||
more and more incongruous <add>and unconducive</add> with reference to the professed<lb/> | |||
end – the avoidance of mis-decision, the fulfilment of the<lb/> | |||
predictions delivered <add>in each case</add> by the substantive branch of the law: or<lb/> | |||
in other words the due administration of genuine and substantial<lb/> | |||
justice.</p> | |||
<p>Under an arrangement thus described, of the two grand <add>main</add><lb/> | |||
divisions of existing <add>the system of established</add> procedure, the summary and the regular<lb/> | |||
the former can not fail of taking the precedence <add>occupying the first place</add>: that<lb/> | |||
which having had justice for its end <add>the real end of its institution</add>, has <add>either</add> been suffered to<lb/> | |||
accommodate itself, and actually has accommodated <add>and does accommodate</add> itself<lb/> | |||
with almost compleat success, <unclear>be</unclear> that its only legitimate end<lb/> | |||
seats itself <add>takes its station</add> of course in the first place: after that comes<lb/> | |||
the mode <add>system of arrangements</add> which having had methodized plunder for its<lb/> | |||
object, <unclear>said</unclear> the <add>privileged</add> sharers in the spoil for its authors, the<lb/> | |||
the administration of justice for its collateral and accidental,<lb/> | |||
though happily <add>to a certain inconsiderable</add> in no small degree its eventual effect, has been<lb/> | |||
but too happily adapted to its not <add>unavowed</add> professed but not the less steadily pursued sinister end.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
30 Jany 1805
Evidence
In marking out the course taken under the English System in its various principal in some of its broadest lines in England
of English origin in relation to the operation in question – viz: the receipt
and extraction of testimony, I shall begin with that
mode of procedure which we consider exactly or at least comes
nearest to a coincidence with the mode plan pattern exhibited
by the above rules. I shall then exhibit in their order
the several ulterior variations, placing first those in which the
aberration is least important; and bringing successively to view
their the instances in which it is wider and wider the
mode pursued more and more vitious, and defective, abundant in imperfection
consequently the means employed were next worse adapted
more and more incongruous and unconducive with reference to the professed
end – the avoidance of mis-decision, the fulfilment of the
predictions delivered in each case by the substantive branch of the law: or
in other words the due administration of genuine and substantial
justice.
Under an arrangement thus described, of the two grand main
divisions of existing the system of established procedure, the summary and the regular
the former can not fail of taking the precedence occupying the first place: that
which having had justice for its end the real end of its institution, has either been suffered to
accommodate itself, and actually has accommodated and does accommodate itself
with almost compleat success, be that its only legitimate end
seats itself takes its station of course in the first place: after that comes
the mode system of arrangements which having had methodized plunder for its
object, said the privileged sharers in the spoil for its authors, the
the administration of justice for its collateral and accidental,
though happily to a certain inconsiderable in no small degree its eventual effect, has been
but too happily adapted to its not unavowed professed but not the less steadily pursued sinister end.
Identifier: | JB/058/359/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1805-01-30 |
8-9 |
||
058 |
evidence |
||
359 |
evidence |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d5 / e5 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
19028 |
|||