JB/081/013/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/013/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><gap/> &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">without</hi> consent of parties a truth <gap/><lb/>long arrived at by Judges &amp; <gap/> <del>enacted</del> <add>allowed by Law</add> by 3 Geo.2.c.25.<lb/><foreign><hi rend="underline">Vide</hi></foreign> <unclear>extract</unclear> <hi rend="underline">Wilkes v <unclear>Leasees</unclear> 1737</hi> &#x2014; <foreign>Vide</foreign> also &#x2014; <unclear>extract</unclear>} <note>N.B.</note><lb/>from State Facts in <hi rend="underline"><unclear>Fitz Lewis's</unclear> case</hi> &amp; in that of <unclear>Simon</unclear> Bishops}</p> <p>V The <add>supposed</add> object of the 3 Geo. p.2. Money Special Juries at the desire of<lb/>either party &#x2014; <foreign><hi rend="underline">Vide</hi></foreign> King's Speech to Parliament 15 <sic>Aug</sic> 1730 &#x2014;<lb/><del><gap/></del> have not profess of attempts to which the <gap/><lb/>of the Press &#x2014; Information received about 50 years before;<lb/><hi rend="underline">and</hi> extract from Bishop <unclear>Basset</unclear> &#x2014; &amp; now <hi rend="underline">Special Juries</hi><lb/>established &#x2014; <foreign>Vide</foreign> Lord Lyttleton &#x2014; <gap/> <sic>D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Johnson.</p> <p>VI The <del>Mode in which this Act is drawn up</del> avowed object of the<lb/>Act &#x2014; &amp; the mode in which it is drawn up &#x2014;</p> <p>1 The object as declared by Preamble to prevent Corruption in<lb/>Juries in consequence of frequent summoning of them</p> <p>2. The object as collected from the enactments <gap/> <add>appear to</add> be the <gap/><lb/>of Jurors from the <gap/> &#x2014; had it his <gap/> so understood.</p> <p>3 The enactments with respect to Special Jurymen inconsistent<lb/>with the other enactments &#x2014;</p> <p>4. Those enactments inconsistent with each other. <sic>sec.</sic> 15. "struck<lb/>"before the Officer of the Court" <sic>sec.</sic> 17. "struck by the Officer"</p> <p>5 <sic>Sec.</sic> 6. enacts Penalties on Sheriffs for the frequent <hi rend="underline">retaining</hi><lb/>of juries &#x2014; <sic>Sec</sic> 15 <hi rend="underline">enacts</hi> that the Jury struck before the<lb/>Master <hi rend="underline">which be the Jury retained</hi> by the Sheriff &#x2014; 2. <gap/> <note>NB</note><lb/>these inconsistencies is Sheriff <del>are</del> liable to Penalties for<lb/>retaining the Jury so struck, supposing <del>it</del> they have<lb/>served within the time specified? &#x2014; &amp; 2 2. <hi rend="underline">If Sheriff</hi><lb/><gap/> to retain them contrary to the terms of the statute <note>NB</note><lb/><del>to p</del> is he guilty of Contempt of Court? &#x2014;</p> <p>VIII The 4 Geo. 2. c. 7 &#x2014; Regulates Juries in <sic>Middx.</sic> &#x2014;</p> <p>VIII The 24 Geo. 2. c.18 Regulates payment to Special Jurymen &#x2014; &amp;<lb/>confines <del>it</del> <add>the fees</add> to 1 Guinea</p> <p>IX The 29 Geo.2.c.19 Empowers Judges to fine Jurymen not obeying<lb/><del>summers</del> summons</p> <p>X This being the history <del>&amp;</del> as far as I can ascertain &amp; the Law<lb/>imputing Special Juries but as we consider how they are<lb/>hired &#x2014; whether consistently with their supposed object &#x2014; &amp; whether<lb/>according to Law &#x2014;</p> <p>1 The object of Juries in general &#x2014; <del>a check on the Judge</del><lb/>a. a check on the Judge &amp; for this purpose ought to be<lb/>independent &#x2014; impartial &#x2014; as much as possible <add>unconnected</add></p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

without consent of parties a truth
long arrived at by Judges & enacted allowed by Law by 3 Geo.2.c.25.
Vide extract Wilkes v Leasees 1737Vide also — extract} N.B.
from State Facts in Fitz Lewis's case & in that of Simon Bishops}

V The supposed object of the 3 Geo. p.2. Money Special Juries at the desire of
either party — Vide King's Speech to Parliament 15 Aug 1730 —
have not profess of attempts to which the
of the Press — Information received about 50 years before;
and extract from Bishop Basset — & now Special Juries
established — Vide Lord Lyttleton — Dr Johnson.

VI The Mode in which this Act is drawn up avowed object of the
Act — & the mode in which it is drawn up —

1 The object as declared by Preamble to prevent Corruption in
Juries in consequence of frequent summoning of them

2. The object as collected from the enactments appear to be the
of Jurors from the — had it his so understood.

3 The enactments with respect to Special Jurymen inconsistent
with the other enactments —

4. Those enactments inconsistent with each other. sec. 15. "struck
"before the Officer of the Court" sec. 17. "struck by the Officer"

5 Sec. 6. enacts Penalties on Sheriffs for the frequent retaining
of juries — Sec 15 enacts that the Jury struck before the
Master which be the Jury retained by the Sheriff — 2. NB
these inconsistencies is Sheriff are liable to Penalties for
retaining the Jury so struck, supposing it they have
served within the time specified? — & 2 2. If Sheriff
to retain them contrary to the terms of the statute NB
to p is he guilty of Contempt of Court? —

VIII The 4 Geo. 2. c. 7 — Regulates Juries in Middx.

VIII The 24 Geo. 2. c.18 Regulates payment to Special Jurymen — &
confines it the fees to 1 Guinea

IX The 29 Geo.2.c.19 Empowers Judges to fine Jurymen not obeying
summers summons

X This being the history & as far as I can ascertain & the Law
imputing Special Juries but as we consider how they are
hired — whether consistently with their supposed object — & whether
according to Law —

1 The object of Juries in general — a check on the Judge
a. a check on the Judge & for this purpose ought to be
independent — impartial — as much as possible unconnected



Identifier: | JB/081/013/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1827-10-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

c brenchley 1808

Marginals

Paper Producer

earl of shelburne

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1808

Notes public

[[notes_public::"9 oct. 1827 is not this lord […?] unless determined by law a […?] many years ago (say 10 or 12) to jb qsp?" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

25800

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in