JB/081/061/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/061/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/081/061/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/061/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/061/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1829. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 26.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Abridged Petition</head><lb/>
 
<note>1.  Case<lb/>
 
X.  Mischievous transference</note><lb/>
 
&#9758;  7 Sept. 1829  Supposed superseded this.</p>
<p>1.<lb/>
Transference, bandying,
oscillating –<lb/>
what.</p>
<p>2.<lb/>
Proper course, removal<lb/>
none.<lb/>
Exception for saving<lb/>
preponderant<lb/>
evil.</p>
<p>3.<lb/>
Per Judge and C<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> removal<lb/>
always.<lb/>
Sole exception, Trial<lb/>
at Bar.</p>
<p>4.<lb/>
Proper course.<lb/>
From applicant, elicited<lb/>
the maximum<lb/>
of information – all<lb/>
of it <hi rend="underline">evidence</hi>.</p>
<p>5.<lb/>
Removal – it's evil –<lb/>
Primordial evidence<lb/>
time, labour, money<lb/>
wasted.</p>
<p>6.<lb/>
In <hi rend="underline">Recipient</hi> Judicatory,<lb/>
if originating Judicatory's<lb/>
evidence is<lb/>
employed, <hi rend="underline">record</hi> of it<lb/>
must have been received,<lb/>
or not.</p>
<p>7.<lb/>
If yes, re-examination<lb/>
useless, except<lb/>
for confrontation, must<lb/>
have had place, or not<lb/>
if yes:  labour no wasted.</p>
<pb/>
<p>8.<lb/>
Sole evidence, the<lb/>
originally elicited<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">shape</hi> inferior</p>
<p>9.<lb/>
Originally elicited evidence<lb/>
not admitted,<lb/>
either Justice is denied,<lb/>
by the known inadmissibility<lb/>
of it, or the<lb/>
decision is grounded<lb/>
on <del>incompetent</del> <add>uncompleated</add> evidence<lb/>
– whence misdecision.</p>
<p>10.<lb/>
Proper course.<lb/>
Cases where transference<lb/>
may be useful.<lb/>
Case I.  Preponderant<lb/>
saving of delay &amp;c by<lb/>
transference to divers<lb/>
judicatories – all<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">within reach</hi>.</p>
<p>11.<lb/>
In case of doubt,<lb/>
decide by <hi rend="underline">lot</hi>.</p>
<p>12.<lb/>
Case II.  Judge, objectionable:<lb/>
viz.<lb/>
1.  The person chosen<lb/>
2.  his conduct</p>
<p>13.<lb/>
If his conduct, proper<lb/>
course, appeal or<lb/>
Quasi appeal.</p>
<p>14.<lb/>
Quasi-appeal in every<lb/>
case but where ultimate<lb/>
decision has<lb/>
been pronounced –<lb/>
non-decision having<lb/>
the effect of misdecision.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829. Feby. 26.
Abridged Petition
1. Case
X. Mischievous transference

☞ 7 Sept. 1829 Supposed superseded this.

1.
Transference, bandying, oscillating –
what.

2.
Proper course, removal
none.
Exception for saving
preponderant
evil.

3.
Per Judge and Co. removal
always.
Sole exception, Trial
at Bar.

4.
Proper course.
From applicant, elicited
the maximum
of information – all
of it evidence.

5.
Removal – it's evil –
Primordial evidence
time, labour, money
wasted.

6.
In Recipient Judicatory,
if originating Judicatory's
evidence is
employed, record of it
must have been received,
or not.

7.
If yes, re-examination
useless, except
for confrontation, must
have had place, or not
if yes: labour no wasted.


---page break---

8.
Sole evidence, the
originally elicited
shape inferior

9.
Originally elicited evidence
not admitted,
either Justice is denied,
by the known inadmissibility
of it, or the
decision is grounded
on incompetent uncompleated evidence
– whence misdecision.

10.
Proper course.
Cases where transference
may be useful.
Case I. Preponderant
saving of delay &c by
transference to divers
judicatories – all
within reach.

11.
In case of doubt,
decide by lot.

12.
Case II. Judge, objectionable:
viz.
1. The person chosen
2. his conduct

13.
If his conduct, proper
course, appeal or
Quasi appeal.

14.
Quasi-appeal in every
case but where ultimate
decision has
been pronounced –
non-decision having
the effect of misdecision.


Identifier: | JB/081/061/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-02-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-14

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

061

Info in main headings field

abridged petition

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"7 sept. 1829 supposed superseded this" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

25848

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in