JB/081/066/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/066/001: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
15,555 edits
m Protected "JB/081/066/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
52,682 edits
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/066/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/066/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>1829. March 31.<lb/>
<p>1829. March 31.<lb/>
<head>Petition</head><lb/>
<head>Petition</head><lb/>
Line 31: Line 27:
Procedure Codes<lb/>
Procedure Codes<lb/>
1. Regular.  2. Summary.</p>
1. Regular.  2. Summary.</p>
 
<p>4.<lb/>
 
Under existing system<lb/>
 
summary justice<lb/>
Judicatories four<lb/>
1.  Justices of the Peace.<lb/>
2.  Small Debt Court.<lb/>
3.  Court Martial.<lb/>
4.  House of Commons<lb/>
Judicatory for elicitation<lb/>
of evidence.</p>
<p>5.<lb/>
From the relation of<lb/>
proposed to existing<lb/>
summary proceeding<lb/>
Judicatories – conclusions<lb/>
the following.</p>
<p>6.<lb/>
Under existing system<lb/>
in cases of summary<lb/>
procedure<lb/>
ends aimed at ends<lb/>
of justice.</p>
<p>7.<lb/>
Striking contrast<lb/>
between this and other<lb/>
parts of existing system.</p>
<pb/>
<p>8.<lb/>
Regular business<lb/>
of existing system<lb/>
might every part<lb/>
of it be carried on<lb/>
with advantage in<lb/>
the summary mode.</p>
<p>9.<lb/>
Summary procedure<lb/>
under existing<lb/>
system a ground-work<lb/>
whereon to establish<lb/>
a perfect<lb/>
system.</p>
<p>10.<lb/>
5.  Suits in pendency<lb/>
might with great advantage<lb/>
be stopped, recommenced,<lb/>
carried on and<lb/>
terminated in the summary<lb/>
mode.</p>
<p>11.<lb/>
6.  For this proceeding<lb/>
Injunction a precedent.</p>
<p>12.<lb/>
Thus are driven away<lb/>
all fallacies expressed<lb/>
by the terms <hi rend="underline">unprecedented</hi>,<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">theoretical</hi>, <hi rend="underline">visionary</hi>,<lb/>
&amp;c.</p>
<p>13.<lb/>
Ordinarily entertained<lb/>
idea of summary<lb/>
that it is a sort of<lb/>
makeshift a coarser<lb/>
sort of justice – the<lb/>
reverse of the above<lb/>
true conception of<lb/>
it.</p>
<p>14.<lb/>
Second use of this elucidation<lb/>
facilitation<lb/>
of the conception of<lb/>
the proposed system.<lb/>
1. to Justices of the Peace.<lb/>
2. to Small Debt Court<lb/>
Judges.<lb/>
3. to Court-Martial<lb/>
Judges.<lb/>
4. to House of Commons –<lb/>
evidence-eliciting members.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829. March 31.
Petition
Supplement
§.2. Elucidation

1.
Since drawing up
the Petition, occurs
the notion of elucidation
by comparison
of proposed to existing
system. Uses 1. facilitating
conception
of proposed system.
2. Exhibiting the superiority
of the proposed
over the existing system.

2.
Parts of proposed
system. 1. Proposed
procedure Code. 2.
Proposed Judiciary
Establishment Code.

3.
Procedure Codes
1. Regular. 2. Summary.

4.
Under existing system
summary justice
Judicatories four
1. Justices of the Peace.
2. Small Debt Court.
3. Court Martial.
4. House of Commons
Judicatory for elicitation
of evidence.

5.
From the relation of
proposed to existing
summary proceeding
Judicatories – conclusions
the following.

6.
Under existing system
in cases of summary
procedure
ends aimed at ends
of justice.

7.
Striking contrast
between this and other
parts of existing system.


---page break---

8.
Regular business
of existing system
might every part
of it be carried on
with advantage in
the summary mode.

9.
Summary procedure
under existing
system a ground-work
whereon to establish
a perfect
system.

10.
5. Suits in pendency
might with great advantage
be stopped, recommenced,
carried on and
terminated in the summary
mode.

11.
6. For this proceeding
Injunction a precedent.

12.
Thus are driven away
all fallacies expressed
by the terms unprecedented,
theoretical, visionary,
&c.

13.
Ordinarily entertained
idea of summary
that it is a sort of
makeshift a coarser
sort of justice – the
reverse of the above
true conception of
it.

14.
Second use of this elucidation
facilitation
of the conception of
the proposed system.
1. to Justices of the Peace.
2. to Small Debt Court
Judges.
3. to Court-Martial
Judges.
4. to House of Commons –
evidence-eliciting members.


Identifier: | JB/081/066/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-03-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-14

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

066

Info in main headings field

petition

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25853

Box Contents

Retrieved from "https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/081/066/001&oldid=350578"
UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in