JB/081/076/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 October 2023

1829. April 3. Copied 11.
Petition

1
Determination of
Commissioners in what
cases right or wrong.

2.
More likely right
& wrong not improvably
wrong in every
case.

3.
Grounds for this
determination.
1. Decisions avowed –
sometimes according
– sometimes not.

4.
2. Judges 4 in number
– thence no responsibility.

5.
3. Opinion signed
by all not the opinion
all and not read by

6.
Reasons
1. Labour of reading
2. No fees.
3. No inducements.
4. If an oath taken
this no punishment
of the oath.
5. Probative force
opinion delivered by
of them not so great
if he were not an English
bar-born Judge.

7.
Reason – habit of making
assertions known by him
to be false.

8.
Habit of excluding on the most
pretences.

---page break---

9.
Consistently with
general evidence admission
principle
I should not exclude
the evidence of these
learned Judges.

10.
But if I were obliged
to put an exclusion
on any evidence it
would be on theirs.

11.
Objections calumny
and personality answered.

12.
If instead of four
there were but one
that one would
have greater effect
as to probative force
than all four together.

---page break---

1829. April 11.
Petition

1.
The above the security
in relation to Judiciary
functionaries
under proposed system.

2.
Under present Home
Secretary's system
manducation the
security.

3.
At his instance manducatory
qualification
required by Parliament
in the Police
Magistracy.

4.
Pecuniary qualification
also established
by a retrospective
operation.

5.
At the present moment
the same
wisdom applying
itself to Justices of
the Peace taken at
large.

6.
Economy exemplified
in Peel's bill.

7.
Pecuniary qualification
established in
the case of Police Magistrates
and in that of
ten Justices of the Peace
at large not in that
of the others.

8.
Use of the pecuniary
qualification one
shewn.

---page break---

9.
Pecuniary qualification
no check upon
collusion between
magistrate and
Public House keepers
in relation to licences.

10.
Peel screens himself
from responsibility
by means of Lord
Tenterden.

Identifier: \| JB/081/076/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-04-03	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-12, 1-10
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	076	Info in main headings field	petition
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	b&m 1828
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1828
Notes public		ID Number	25863
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/081/076/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p>1829. April 3.  Copied 11.<lb/>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<head>Petition</head></p>
+<p>1<lb/>
+Determination of<lb/>
+Commissioners in what<lb/>
+cases right or wrong.</p>
+<p>2.<lb/>
+More likely right<lb/>
+&amp; wrong not improvably<lb/>
+wrong in every<lb/>
+case.</p>
+<p>3.<lb/>
+Grounds for this<lb/>
+determination.<lb/>
+.  Decisions avowed –<lb/>
+sometimes according<lb/>
+<gap/> – sometimes not.</p>
+<p>4.<lb/>
+.  Judges 4 in number<lb/>
+– thence no responsibility.</p>
+<p>5.<lb/>
+.  Opinion signed<lb/>
+by all not the opinion<lb/>
+<gap/> all and not read by<lb/>
+<gap/></p>
+<p>6.<lb/>
+<unclear>Reasons</unclear><lb/>
+.  <unclear>Labour</unclear> of reading<lb/>
+.  No fees.<lb/>
+.  No inducements.<lb/>
+.  If an oath taken<lb/>
+<gap/> this no punishment<lb/>
+<gap/> of the oath.<lb/>
+.  Probative force<lb/>
+opinion delivered by<lb/>
+<gap/> of them not so great<lb/>
+if he were not an English<lb/>
+bar-born Judge.</p>
+<p>7.<lb/>
+Reason – habit of making<lb/>
+assertions known by him<lb/>
+to be false.</p>
+<p>8.<lb/>
+Habit of excluding <gap/> on the most<lb/>
+<gap/> pretences.</p>
+<pb/>
+<p>9.<lb/>
+Consistently with<lb/>
+general evidence admission<lb/>
+principle<lb/>
+I should not exclude<lb/>
+the evidence of these<lb/>
+learned Judges.</p>
+<p>10.<lb/>
+But if I were obliged<lb/>
+to put an exclusion<lb/>
+on any evidence it<lb/>
+would be on theirs.</p>
+<p>11.<lb/>
+Objections calumny<lb/>
+and personality answered.</p>
+<p>12.<lb/>
+If instead of four<lb/>
+there were but one<lb/>
+that one would<lb/>
+have greater effect<lb/>
+as to probative force<lb/>
+than all four together.</p>
+<pb/>
+<p>1829. April 11.<lb/>
+<head>Petition</head></p>
+<p>1.<lb/>
+The above the security<lb/>
+in relation to Judiciary<lb/>
+functionaries<lb/>
+under proposed system.</p>
+<p>2.<lb/>
+Under present Home<lb/>
+Secretary's system<lb/>
+<hi rend="underline">manducation</hi> the<lb/>
+security.</p>
+<p>3.<lb/>
+At his instance manducatory<lb/>
+qualification<lb/>
+required by Parliament<lb/>
+in the Police<lb/>
+Magistracy.</p>
+<p>4.<lb/>
+Pecuniary qualification<lb/>
+also established<lb/>
+by a retrospective<lb/>
+operation.</p>
+<p>5.<lb/>
+At the present moment<lb/>
+the same<lb/>
+wisdom applying<lb/>
+itself to Justices of<lb/>
+the Peace taken at<lb/>
+large.</p>
+<p>6.<lb/>
+Economy exemplified<lb/>
+in Peel's bill.</p>
+<p>7.<lb/>
+Pecuniary qualification<lb/>
+established in<lb/>
+the case of Police Magistrates<lb/>
+and in that of<lb/>
+ten Justices of the Peace<lb/>
+at large not in that<lb/>
+of the others.</p>
+<p>8.<lb/>
+Use of the pecuniary<lb/>
+qualification one<lb/>
+shewn.</p>
+<pb/>
+<p>9.<lb/>
+Pecuniary qualification<lb/>
+no check upon<lb/>
+collusion between<lb/>
+magistrate and<lb/>
+Public House keepers<lb/>
+in relation to licences.</p>
+<p>10.<lb/>
+Peel screens himself<lb/>
+from responsibility<lb/>
+by means of Lord<lb/>
+Tenterden.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/081/076/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 October 2023

Navigation

Search