★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 May 25<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(3 <note>§. 11 Elucidations<lb/>§. Reconciliation Commissioners</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Beneficial effects<lb/>1. Minimization of<lb/><sic>expence</sic> & delay<lb/>2. Obtainment of law<lb/>opinions from a more<lb/>trustworthy source</note></p> <!-- all text lightly crossed through in pencil --> <p>Now then as to the beneficial effects in the county in question<lb/> | <head>1829 May 25<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(3 <note>§. 11 Elucidations<lb/>§. Reconciliation Commissioners</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Beneficial effects<lb/>1. Minimization of<lb/><sic>expence</sic> & delay<lb/>2. Obtainment of law<lb/>opinions from a more<lb/>trustworthy source</note></p> <!-- all text lightly crossed through in pencil --> <p>Now then as to the beneficial effects in the county in question<lb/>relation <add>with reference to</add> being had to parties, who <del><gap/></del> might otherwise have been<lb/>suitors but by this means are prevented from becoming so.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p>Here<lb/>it will secure <unclear>place</unclear> or debate before an set <add>class</add> of men the Judges so<lb/>called prevented: but at the same time <gap/> defects before another<lb/>set <add>class</add> of men the Commissioners — produced even when attendance by the<lb/>proposed Defendant is not found, as above. Where then <add>In what shape</add> it may<lb/>naturally be asked is the benefit produced? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi> In this shape.<lb/>The small for abovementioned excepted, this debate, the sort of pretence<lb/>may such carried on before the Commission is carried on, without <sic>expence</sic><lb/><del><gap/></del> to either party: whereas were it carried on, and when<lb/><unclear>eventually</unclear> it comes to be carried on before the Judicatory, it<lb/>is carried on at <sic>expence</sic> more or less considerable to both.</p> <p>I. Benefit the first. <add>To the extent of the field of competence in his the legal field of <del><gap/></del></add> Substitution of <add>the effect of</add> trial and judgment<lb/>with next to no <add>the minimum of</add> <sic>expence</sic> to <unclear>it</unclear> at a boundless <sic>expence,</sic> and<lb/><del>clear of all factitious</del> as also at the minimum of delay: the<lb/>actual delay being clear of all factitious delay produced<lb/>for the sake of the profit out of the <sic>expence</sic></p> <p>II. Benefit the second. <del>Obtainment of gratuities of Law</del> <add>To that same <unclear>extreme</unclear>. From a more trustworthy source and <sic>graticitously,</sic><lb/>obtainment of<lb/>the sort of</add><lb/><del>Opinion: more <add>of <gap/></add> and this</del> <add>Law Opinion customarily sought with a view to eventual commencement or defence of suits.<lb/>of Opinions</add> more trustworthy than any that<lb/>can be delivered by professional Lawyers</p> <p>Explanations are <del>required — Here then</del> <add>needful: explanations</add> follows.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 May 25
Petitions
ult
Supplement
(3 §. 11 Elucidations
§. Reconciliation Commissioners
6
Beneficial effects
1. Minimization of
expence & delay
2. Obtainment of law
opinions from a more
trustworthy source
Now then as to the beneficial effects in the county in question
relation with reference to being had to parties, who might otherwise have been
suitors but by this means are prevented from becoming so.
Here
it will secure place or debate before an set class of men the Judges so
called prevented: but at the same time defects before another
set class of men the Commissioners — produced even when attendance by the
proposed Defendant is not found, as above. Where then In what shape it may
naturally be asked is the benefit produced? Answer In this shape.
The small for abovementioned excepted, this debate, the sort of pretence
may such carried on before the Commission is carried on, without expence
to either party: whereas were it carried on, and when
eventually it comes to be carried on before the Judicatory, it
is carried on at expence more or less considerable to both.
I. Benefit the first. To the extent of the field of competence in his the legal field of Substitution of the effect of trial and judgment
with next to no the minimum of expence to it at a boundless expence, and
clear of all factitious as also at the minimum of delay: the
actual delay being clear of all factitious delay produced
for the sake of the profit out of the expence
II. Benefit the second. Obtainment of gratuities of Law To that same extreme. From a more trustworthy source and graticitously,
obtainment of
the sort of
Opinion: more of and this Law Opinion customarily sought with a view to eventual commencement or defence of suits.
of Opinions more trustworthy than any that
can be delivered by professional Lawyers
Explanations are required — Here then needful: explanations follows.
|
Identifier: | JB/081/240/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-05-25 |
6 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
240 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
26027 |
|||
