JB/081/256/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/256/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/081/256/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 May 31<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>(4) (4 <note>Parties appearance<lb/>&#x2014; whence the exclusion.</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Deceitfulness for depredation<lb/><del>being</del> <add>&amp; oppression</add> the propriety<lb/>of Judge &amp; <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> &#x2014; Thence<lb/>their minds more depraved<lb/>than those of the<lb/>malefactors they <unclear>have</unclear><lb/>to <sic>controul</sic>.</note></p> <p><del><gap/> Mendacity and insincerity</del> <add>Deceitfulness thence untrustworthiness</add> applied to the purpose<lb/><add>constantly</add> of depredation, occasionally of oppression, being thus the<lb/><foreign>proprium partes</foreign> mode <add>as the logicians say</add> of <add>the men</add> <del>the man</del> of <unclear>time</unclear> &#x2014; belonging to <hi rend="underline">all</hi><lb/>of them and <hi rend="underline">at all times</hi>, though <hi rend="underline">not</hi> to them <hi rend="underline">alone</hi> <del>belonging<lb/>to <gap/></del> <add><foreign>proprium</foreign> as the logicians  say <foreign>omni</foreign></add> <foreign>et semper sed <gap/> sole,</foreign> thus it is that the <del>person</del> <add>minds</add><lb/>occupied in keeping under <sic>controul</sic> the several classes of the<lb/>so called <hi rend="underline">malefactors</hi> have been minds more depraved and<lb/><sic>vitious</sic> than those <del>of any <gap/></del> on whom the <del>imputation</del> <add>reproach</add> of<lb/>depravity and <sic>vitiousness</sic> have <add>so profusely and exclusively and profusely</add> been poured fault.  By the<lb/>murder he proposes may be accomplished <add>and number of times</add> by the robber his<lb/>occupation for any length of time without the utterance of a single<lb/>wilful <sic>falshood</sic> nay even by the thief, how naturally so ever<lb/><add>wilful</add> <sic>falshood</sic> may be the accomplishment of it.  But in every <!-- brackets in pencil -->[civilized] country <del><gap/></del> but in a more especial; manner in England<lb/>the great <unclear>misery</unclear> <add>authorized</add> of his and <gap/> the occupation of an <del>I</del> <gap/><lb/>can not be carried on without the constant and uninterrupted<lb/>practice of <add>vice in</add> those <del><gap/></del> its so conspicuously <gap/> forms.<lb/><del>As little</del> In England, <hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> under the system of<lb/>procedure <gap/> not in<lb/>the manner that has been<lb/>seen</note> as little without such habitual and uninterrupted<lb/><sic>malifecence</sic> can it be by the Judge.  <add>Thus as the matter actually stands.</add>  But in the nature<lb/>of the case, lying and <gap/> are they necessary to the<lb/><del><gap/>,/del> <add>correct</add> <sic>fulfuilment</sic> of the duties of a Judge? <del>About</del> <add>Exactly</add> as much <del>as the</del><lb/>so as <del>the taking</del> <add>a mixture</add> of <gap/> from a kennel is necessary to the<lb/>making of a <add>good</add> plum pudding.</p> <p><note>12<lb/>Close connection of<lb/>members of Judge &amp; <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>in imposing <gap/> the people</note></p> <p><del>By</del> Linked together in such intimate <gap/> by a community<lb/>of sinister intent so closely have been the fraternity<lb/>of lawyers, that by a <del>sy</del> combined system of misrepresentation<lb/>they have been engaged the people at large to swallow absurdities, such<lb/><del>the gross</del> as by the grossness vie with those which have had for<lb/.their authors so many classes of religionists.  On the ground of<lb/><add>no more than</add> one simple act of mendacity supposed to be proved, they have succeeded<lb/>in persuading the people to sit contented, while a suit has<lb/> been deprived of <del>on the</del> <add>a</add> light <del>that would have</del> for the want of which<lb/><del>a man</del> <gap/> may have been substituted to right by exclusion put<lb/>upon a lot of indispensable evidence, which if <gap/> was<lb/>a<lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> fit ground for such exclusion,<lb/>the strength of<lb?>the ground for applying<lb/>the exclusion to the <gap/><lb/>of the invention of the<lb/>rule would be the strongest<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> if the ground for applying it to him to whom they have then applied it is as infinity to one.</p>
<head>1829 May 31<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>(4) (4 <note>Parties appearance<lb/>&#x2014; whence the exclusion.</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Deceitfulness for depredation<lb/><del>being</del> <add>&amp; oppression</add> the propriety<lb/>of Judge &amp; <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> &#x2014; Thence<lb/>their minds more depraved<lb/>than those of the<lb/>malefactors they <unclear>have</unclear><lb/>to <sic>controul</sic>.</note></p> <p><del><gap/> Mendacity and insincerity</del> <add>Deceitfulness thence untrustworthiness</add> applied to the purpose<lb/><add>constantly</add> of depredation, occasionally of oppression, being thus the<lb/><foreign>proprium partes</foreign> mode <add>as the logicians say</add> of <add>the men</add> <del>the man</del> of <unclear>time</unclear> &#x2014; belonging to <hi rend="underline">all</hi><lb/>of them and <hi rend="underline">at all times</hi>, though <hi rend="underline">not</hi> to them <hi rend="underline">alone</hi> <del>belonging<lb/>to <gap/></del> <add><foreign>proprium</foreign> as the logicians  say <foreign>omni</foreign></add> <foreign>et semper sed <gap/> sole,</foreign> thus it is that the <del>person</del> <add>minds</add><lb/>occupied in keeping under <sic>controul</sic> the several classes of the<lb/>so called <hi rend="underline">malefactors</hi> have been minds more depraved and<lb/><sic>vitious</sic> than those <del>of any <gap/></del> on whom the <del>imputation</del> <add>reproach</add> of<lb/>depravity and <sic>vitiousness</sic> have <add>so profusely and exclusively and profusely</add> been poured fault.  By the<lb/>murder he proposes may be accomplished <add>any number of times</add>, by the robber his<lb/>occupation for any length of time without the utterance of a single<lb/>wilful <sic>falshood</sic> nay even by the King, how naturally so ever<lb/><add>wilful</add> <sic>falshood</sic> may be the accompaniment of it.  But in every <!-- brackets in pencil -->[civilized] country <del><gap/></del> but in a more especial manner in England<lb/>the great <unclear>misery</unclear> of <add>authorized</add> lies and liars the occupation of an <del>J</del> Advocate<lb/>can not be carried on without the constant and uninterrupted<lb/>practice of <add>vice in</add> those <del>debasing</del> its so conspicuously <gap/> forms.<lb/><del>As little</del> In England, <hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> under the system of<lb/>procedure spun out in<lb/>the manner that has been<lb/>seen</note> as little without such habitual and uninterrupted<lb/><sic>malifecence</sic> can it be by the Judge.  <add>Thus as the matter actually stands.</add>  But in the nature<lb/>of the case, lying and <unclear>mistrusts</unclear> are they necessary to the<lb/><del><gap/></del> <add>correct</add> <sic>fulfuilment</sic> of the duties of a Judge? <del>About</del> <add>Exactly</add> as much <del>as the</del><lb/>so as <del>the taking</del> <add>a mixture</add> of <unclear>mire</unclear> from a kennel is necessary to the<lb/>making of a <add>good</add> plum pudding.</p> <p><note>12<lb/>Close connection of<lb/>members of Judge &amp; <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>in imposing <unclear>on</unclear> the people</note></p> <p><del>By</del> Linked together in such intimate <unclear>mind</unclear> by a community<lb/>of sinister intent so closely have been the fraternity<lb/>of lawyers, that by a <del>sy</del> combined system of misrepresentation<lb/>they have been engaged the people at large to swallow absurdities, such<lb/><del>the gross</del> as by the grossness vie with those which have had for<lb/>their authors so many classes of religionists.  On the ground of<lb/><add>no more than</add> one simple act of mendacity supposed to be proved, they have succeeded<lb/>in persuading the people to sit contented, while a suit has<lb/> been deprived of <del>on the</del> <add>a</add> light <del>that would have</del> for the want of which<lb/><del>a man</del> misery may have been substituted to right by exclusion put<lb/>upon a lot of indispensable evidence, which if mendacity was<lb/>a<lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> fit ground for such exclusion,<lb/>the strength of<lb/>the ground for applying<lb/>the exclusion to the testimony<lb/>of the inventors of the<lb/>rule would be the strongest<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> if the ground for applying it to him to whom they have thus applied it is as infinity to one.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:02, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 31
Petitions

Supplement
(4) (4 Parties appearance
— whence the exclusion.

11
Deceitfulness for depredation
being & oppression the propriety
of Judge & Co — Thence
their minds more depraved
than those of the
malefactors they have
to controul.

Mendacity and insincerity Deceitfulness thence untrustworthiness applied to the purpose
constantly of depredation, occasionally of oppression, being thus the
proprium partes mode as the logicians say of the men the man of time — belonging to all
of them and at all times, though not to them alone belonging
to
proprium as the logicians say omni et semper sed sole, thus it is that the person minds
occupied in keeping under controul the several classes of the
so called malefactors have been minds more depraved and
vitious than those of any on whom the imputation reproach of
depravity and vitiousness have so profusely and exclusively and profusely been poured fault. By the
murder he proposes may be accomplished any number of times, by the robber his
occupation for any length of time without the utterance of a single
wilful falshood nay even by the King, how naturally so ever
wilful falshood may be the accompaniment of it. But in every [civilized] country but in a more especial manner in England
the great misery of authorized lies and liars the occupation of an J Advocate
can not be carried on without the constant and uninterrupted
practice of vice in those debasing its so conspicuously forms.
As little In England, [+]1 [+]1 under the system of
procedure spun out in
the manner that has been
seen
as little without such habitual and uninterrupted
malifecence can it be by the Judge. Thus as the matter actually stands. But in the nature
of the case, lying and mistrusts are they necessary to the
correct fulfuilment of the duties of a Judge? About Exactly as much as the
so as the taking a mixture of mire from a kennel is necessary to the
making of a good plum pudding.

12
Close connection of
members of Judge & Co
in imposing on the people

By Linked together in such intimate mind by a community
of sinister intent so closely have been the fraternity
of lawyers, that by a sy combined system of misrepresentation
they have been engaged the people at large to swallow absurdities, such
the gross as by the grossness vie with those which have had for
their authors so many classes of religionists. On the ground of
no more than one simple act of mendacity supposed to be proved, they have succeeded
in persuading the people to sit contented, while a suit has
been deprived of on the a light that would have for the want of which
a man misery may have been substituted to right by exclusion put
upon a lot of indispensable evidence, which if mendacity was
a
fit ground for such exclusion,
the strength of
the ground for applying
the exclusion to the testimony
of the inventors of the
rule would be the strongest
if the ground for applying it to him to whom they have thus applied it is as infinity to one.




Identifier: | JB/081/256/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

256

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26043

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in