JB/091/035/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/091/035/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/035/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->31 July 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Scotch Reform</head></p>
 
<p>Who is my neighbour?  The word is is thus put for ought to be.  Had <hi rend="underline">is</hi> been meant<lb/>
 
<add>and the man of law the interrogator, a duty no divinity, no inspiration would have been required necessary</add> to answer it.</p>
 
<p>Perhaps so:  but the plan being for Scotland, may not learned advice<lb/>
be listened to from English Counsellors –</p>
<p>My Lord – who is the <add><unclear>other</unclear></add> lawyers neighbour?  Is it the suitor<lb/>
anywhere?  No, my Lord:  it is the lawyer everywhere.  <add>Everywhere</add> The<lb/>
same interests beget the same prejudices:  the same interests and the<lb/>
same prejudices the same passions and the same arts.  Their name<lb/>
is legion:  they form a phalanx covering and oppressing the whole of the civilized part of the <add>human</add><lb/>
world <add>kind</add>.</p>
<p>I speak in the dark – and though my conjecture being<lb/>
but a random conjecture <add>my conjecture in regard to the cause of a particular incident</add> should be ill founded, it will be no prejudice<lb/>
to the principle.  I speak in the dark:  but if <del><gap/></del><lb/>
an incident I have observed in <del>you</del> a speech of Your Lordships<lb/>
on this very occasion should <add>be found to</add> afford an experimental proof of a<lb/>
proposition so plain in principle, it will be altogether in the natural<lb/>
order of things.</p>
<p>In that speech <add>the report I have seen</add> I observe a hint of an arrangement so<lb/>
efficient that in comparison of it <add>without it</add> the root of the plan will give the<lb/>
lawyers <add>professional men</add> little to fear.  Turning to the Resolutions, I perceive<lb/>
that arrangement dropt.  When proposed by Your Lordship, it being<lb/>
considered as a novelty <add>a sort of innovation</add>, it was proposed with diffidence.<lb/>
To what are <gap/> ascribe on <gap/> so <foreign>deflebiles</foreign>?  Being so<lb/>
novel – originating perhaps in some unlearned hand – in some<lb/>
such unlearned head as planned <add>framed</add> the Grenville Act – was it not<lb/>
submitted to the appropriate <del>jug</del> judgment of some especially and<lb/>
extremely learned person, and was not his learning adverse<lb/>
to it?</p>
<p>The question is one of those presumptuous ones which presumptuous<lb/>
as they are do not so much as expect an answer.<lb/>
I presume not to force the penetration of the cabinet.  Your Lordship's<lb/>
duty is to maintain silence:  but my right is to suppress doubts.<lb/>
I say nothing as to the arrangement here:  the occasion for speaking of it<lb/>
will come presently.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:02, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

31 July 1806
Scotch Reform

Who is my neighbour? The word is is thus put for ought to be. Had is been meant
and the man of law the interrogator, a duty no divinity, no inspiration would have been required necessary to answer it.

Perhaps so: but the plan being for Scotland, may not learned advice
be listened to from English Counsellors –

My Lord – who is the other lawyers neighbour? Is it the suitor
anywhere? No, my Lord: it is the lawyer everywhere. Everywhere The
same interests beget the same prejudices: the same interests and the
same prejudices the same passions and the same arts. Their name
is legion: they form a phalanx covering and oppressing the whole of the civilized part of the human
world kind.

I speak in the dark – and though my conjecture being
but a random conjecture my conjecture in regard to the cause of a particular incident should be ill founded, it will be no prejudice
to the principle. I speak in the dark: but if
an incident I have observed in you a speech of Your Lordships
on this very occasion should be found to afford an experimental proof of a
proposition so plain in principle, it will be altogether in the natural
order of things.

In that speech the report I have seen I observe a hint of an arrangement so
efficient that in comparison of it without it the root of the plan will give the
lawyers professional men little to fear. Turning to the Resolutions, I perceive
that arrangement dropt. When proposed by Your Lordship, it being
considered as a novelty a sort of innovation, it was proposed with diffidence.
To what are ascribe on so deflebiles? Being so
novel – originating perhaps in some unlearned hand – in some
such unlearned head as planned framed the Grenville Act – was it not
submitted to the appropriate jug judgment of some especially and
extremely learned person, and was not his learning adverse
to it?

The question is one of those presumptuous ones which presumptuous
as they are do not so much as expect an answer.
I presume not to force the penetration of the cabinet. Your Lordship's
duty is to maintain silence: but my right is to suppress doubts.
I say nothing as to the arrangement here: the occasion for speaking of it
will come presently.


Identifier: | JB/091/035/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1806-07-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

035

Info in main headings field

scotch reform

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29031

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in