JB/091/136/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/136/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/136/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/136/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/136/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->28 Dec<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Scotch Reform  To L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Grenville</head></p>
 
<p>The broad principle admitted <add>established</add> many arrangements<lb/>
 
of detail – more than your Lordship would expect or wish to see <add>dwell upon</add> in the plan<lb/>
 
of detail might be added to assist <add>strengthen</add> or soften the application<lb/>
of it.</p>
<p>1.  On the occasion as on another <add>the other</add> already mentioned<lb/>
the case of irreparable damage, and the enquiries <add>made</add> other<lb/>
<del>operations</del> necessary for preventing it must be presumed<lb/>
to have been made, the <del><gap/></del> <unclear>securities</unclear> <del>necessary to be</del> <add>to have been</add> taken<lb/>
the operations performed.</p>
<p>2.  Sequestration in <gap/> <gap/>, if not agreed upon<lb/>
by <del>the</del> both parties, <unclear>nominated</unclear> in proper inquiry, by<lb/>
the Court:  <add>in a pecuniary</add> the interest, if the length of time makes it<lb/>
an object, may at any rate be paid over to the plff<lb/>
<del><gap/> the</del> at least in finding security for eventual <unclear>refusion</unclear>,<lb/>
viz: on the credit of the judgment already pronounced<lb/>
by the Court below, <add>for if not with this</add> for if it be not fit to be trusted thus far,<lb/>
what is it fit to be trusted with?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:02, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

28 Decy 1806
Scotch Reform To Ld Grenville

The broad principle admitted established many arrangements
of detail – more than your Lordship would expect or wish to see dwell upon in the plan
of detail might be added to assist strengthen or soften the application
of it.

1. On the occasion as on another the other already mentioned
the case of irreparable damage, and the enquiries made other
operations necessary for preventing it must be presumed
to have been made, the securities necessary to be to have been taken
the operations performed.

2. Sequestration in , if not agreed upon
by the both parties, nominated in proper inquiry, by
the Court: in a pecuniary the interest, if the length of time makes it
an object, may at any rate be paid over to the plff
the at least in finding security for eventual refusion,
viz: on the credit of the judgment already pronounced
by the Court below, for if not with this for if it be not fit to be trusted thus far,
what is it fit to be trusted with?


Identifier: | JB/091/136/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1806-12-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

21-23

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

136

Info in main headings field

scotch reform to ld grenville

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29132

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in