JB/143/114/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/143/114/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1824 June 23</p>
 
<head>Rationale of Reward</head>
<note>&sect; 1. Scale of Rank</note><lb/>


<p>That the work in question was not <add>which what <gap/> above was writing</add> at that time before<lb/>
one and that accordingly <gap/> it was only <gap/> repeat that I spoke of it<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> I conclude from this circumstance.  Occupations mentioned<lb/>
as included in the institution are those of Secretaries, Judges<lb/>
Medical men and Academicians: and these four are the<lb/>
only ones exemplified  Now the fact is that of these four<lb/>
the only ones exemplified are those of Judges. <del>With the</del> <gap/><lb/>
it may be in regard to Judges, the other three occupations right<lb/>
to have given <unclear>me</unclear> a suspicion not least of the <gap/>rness of the<lb/>
institution. <del>To <gap/></del> Absurd enough the idea of establishing <lb/>
preferments and informants of rank <del><gap/> believe</del> class <add>compared</add><del>and</del> class<lb/>
in between Secretaries, Medical man and Academicians<lb/>
Not less so that establishing destinations of rank as between Security<lb/>
and <add>compared with</add> Secretary with or without regard to the situation of the personage<lb/>
<add>to whom</add> or Board to <del><gap/></del> which the individual in question or Secretary, and <lb/>
so between Medical man and Medical man, Academician<lb/>
and Academician, and this by an instrument of nomination<lb/>
regard by the <del>Sovereign</del><add>Monarch</add> or some functionary under <gap/></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824 June 23

Rationale of Reward § 1. Scale of Rank

That the work in question was not which what above was writing at that time before
one and that accordingly it was only repeat that I spoke of it
I conclude from this circumstance. Occupations mentioned
as included in the institution are those of Secretaries, Judges
Medical men and Academicians: and these four are the
only ones exemplified Now the fact is that of these four
the only ones exemplified are those of Judges. With the
it may be in regard to Judges, the other three occupations right
to have given me a suspicion not least of the rness of the
institution. To Absurd enough the idea of establishing
preferments and informants of rank believe class comparedand class
in between Secretaries, Medical man and Academicians
Not less so that establishing destinations of rank as between Security
and compared with Secretary with or without regard to the situation of the personage
to whom or Board to which the individual in question or Secretary, and
so between Medical man and Medical man, Academician
and Academician, and this by an instrument of nomination
regard by the SovereignMonarch or some functionary under



Identifier: | JB/143/114/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

1825-06-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

143

Main Headings

rationale of reward

Folio number

114

Info in main headings field

rationale of reward

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48747

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in