JB/159/138/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/138/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/138/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/138/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>9</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Popularity</head></p>
 
<p><gap/> it is <del>very</del> I imagine very true:  <del>and</del> it<lb/>
 
is equally true with respect to every other kind<lb/>
 
of punishment.  It is very true that a man <add>men<lb/>
in general</add> does not like to <del>suffer the punishment of</del> <add>be punished with death, and</add><lb/>
if it depended upon their consent <add>they had their chance</add>, would not<lb/>
be punished in that manner.  It is equally true<lb/>
that men in general do not like to be punished<lb/>
<add>at all</add>, and if it depended on their consent<lb/>
would not be punished in any other <add><del>whate</del></add> manner<lb/>
<add>whatever</add></p>
<p>If the meaning be that no man <del>ever consented</del> <add>has ever given such<lb/>
consent</add> previously to the passing of a Law to that<lb/>
effect it is neither universally true, nor if it<lb/>
were could it be any thing to the purpose.</p>
<p>In England <add>Great Britain</add> for example it is not true.  It<lb/>
is Death for example to forge a Deed.  <del>Now</del><lb/>
A Law to this effect was passed in the <del>late</del> last<lb/>
reign in the usual way by King Lords<lb/>
&amp; Commons.  Now <add>of</add> the Lords and Commons <add>every man</add> who<lb/>
voted in favour of this Law <add><del>every man</del></add> gave consent to<lb/>
their <add>his</add> suffering this punishment of death in<lb/>
case of his committing such a Forgery.</p>
<p>But if it were true, <del>?</del> what would it prove?<lb/>
just nothing, unless upon the supposition that<lb/>
every government that <del>ever subsisted</del> <add>subsists or by possibility</add><lb/>
ever can subsist will have been unlawful.  It is<lb/>
not lawful, says the argument, to <del>put</del> inflict the<lb/>
<add>punishment</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

9

Popularity

it is very I imagine very true: and it
is equally true with respect to every other kind
of punishment. It is very true that a man men
in general
does not like to suffer the punishment of be punished with death, and
if it depended upon their consent they had their chance, would not
be punished in that manner. It is equally true
that men in general do not like to be punished
at all, and if it depended on their consent
would not be punished in any other whate manner
whatever

If the meaning be that no man ever consented has ever given such
consent
previously to the passing of a Law to that
effect it is neither universally true, nor if it
were could it be any thing to the purpose.

In England Great Britain for example it is not true. It
is Death for example to forge a Deed. Now
A Law to this effect was passed in the late last
reign in the usual way by King Lords
& Commons. Now of the Lords and Commons every man who
voted in favour of this Law every man gave consent to
their his suffering this punishment of death in
case of his committing such a Forgery.

But if it were true, ? what would it prove?
just nothing, unless upon the supposition that
every government that ever subsisted subsists or by possibility
ever can subsist will have been unlawful. It is
not lawful, says the argument, to put inflict the
punishment


Identifier: | JB/159/138/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

138

Info in main headings field

popularity

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53961

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in