JB/159/215/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/215/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/215/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/215/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>19</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Quasi-Imprisonment &amp;c.</head></p>
 
<p>Viewing it in either of the <del>three</del> lights above<lb/>
 
mentioned, there seems but little room <add>ground</add> for <del>either</del> <add>the subsidiary</add><lb/>
 
punishment to take hold (on the delinquent).<lb/>
In the case in question it could scarcely answer the<lb/>
purpose to make the duration of the banishment<lb/>
<add>with respect to Great Britain and Ireland</add> (only temporary) less than perpetual.  This then would<lb/>
effectually place the person of the delinquent out<lb/>
of the reach of (punishment) being <add>any more</add> punished in Great<lb/>
Britain or Ireland (<del>being</del> these <add>being the</add> <unclear>pervaders</unclear> of the<lb/>
British Empire <del>from</del> <add>out of</add> which the delinquents were<lb/>
expelled and from which they stood excluded <add>it was mean to exclude them</add>) than<lb/>
if they had not transgressed the prohibition <del>of</del> to<lb/>
of going to <add>any part of the</add> French or Spanish Empire.  If taken<lb/>
<del>in America</del> <add>indeed in British America, or any other part of the British Empire,</add> after having been in France in Spain<lb/>
they would indeed be liable to suffer <add>undergo</add> (the punishment <add>subsidiary punishment</add> denounced against).  But the effect of this is<lb/>
only to exclude them from (British America &amp;) those<lb/>
other parts of the Empire to which there is no<lb/>
reason for supposing them any ways induced to go.<lb/>
<del>2.  As to</del> <add>The subsidiary therefore</add> It seems therefore to be nugatory or very<lb/>
nearly so with respect to any effect it could have<lb/>
upon the person of the delinquent.</p>
<p>As <del>to</del> the property, that while it remained in<lb/>
Great Britain or Ireland would operate upon him, <lb/>
<foreign>pro tanto</foreign> while it continued <del>there</del> within the Jurisdiction<lb/>
of those countries:  but as there is no chance<lb/>
<add>to</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

19

Quasi-Imprisonment &c.

Viewing it in either of the three lights above
mentioned, there seems but little room ground for either the subsidiary
punishment to take hold (on the delinquent).
In the case in question it could scarcely answer the
purpose to make the duration of the banishment
with respect to Great Britain and Ireland (only temporary) less than perpetual. This then would
effectually place the person of the delinquent out
of the reach of (punishment) being any more punished in Great
Britain or Ireland (being these being the pervaders of the
British Empire from out of which the delinquents were
expelled and from which they stood excluded it was mean to exclude them) than
if they had not transgressed the prohibition of to
of going to any part of the French or Spanish Empire. If taken
in America indeed in British America, or any other part of the British Empire, after having been in France in Spain
they would indeed be liable to suffer undergo (the punishment subsidiary punishment denounced against). But the effect of this is
only to exclude them from (British America &) those
other parts of the Empire to which there is no
reason for supposing them any ways induced to go.
2. As to The subsidiary therefore It seems therefore to be nugatory or very
nearly so with respect to any effect it could have
upon the person of the delinquent.

As to the property, that while it remained in
Great Britain or Ireland would operate upon him,
pro tanto while it continued there within the Jurisdiction
of those countries: but as there is no chance
to


Identifier: | JB/159/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

215

Info in main headings field

quasi-imprisonment &c

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f19 / f20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54038

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in