JB/159/266/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/266/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/266/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/266/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>115)</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>CRIT. JUR. CRIM.</head></p>
 
<p>that is, that no case which <add>by fear of the penalty</add> he could be made to exert would<lb/>
 
be sufficient to prevent it, there could be no reason<lb/>
 
for charging him with the minutest part of it.  <del>In</del><lb/>
We may go farther.  There would be no reason for charging<lb/>
him with any part of it, if the <add>certain</add> pain which it<lb/>
would be of to him and to the generality of persons in<lb/>
his situation to exert that case which would be requisite<lb/>
to prevent the <del>mischief</del> <add>damage</add> would exceed the value<lb/>
of the chance there is for the damage's happening to<lb/>
S.  <del>Let us take an</del></p>
<p>Let us take an instance.  S is the owner of a<lb/>
Coach.  A. of a Waggon.  The fortune of S. is double<lb/>
to that of A.  They <add>are</add> travelling <del>the same road</del> to the same<lb/>
<del>place</del> <add>Town</add>.  They come to a place where the road<lb/>
divides into two, both leading however to the Town.<lb/>
<del>By road</del> <add>The right hand road is the only one which a Coach can take.</add>  It is better for a single carriage than the<lb/>
left:  but such is the narrowness of it, that <del>there</del> the<lb/>
chance is as 1 to 20 that if they travel together<lb/>
the Coach by jostling against the Waggon will sustain<lb/>
a damage to the amount of 20<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi>  On the other<lb/>
hand if the Waggon takes the left hand road<lb/>
there will be no such hazard.  But the Waggon must<lb/>
at all events pay a toll of 1<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi></p>
<p>Now I say that in this case supposing the damage<lb/>
to happen, the management of the two carriages having<lb/>
been left entirely to the Coachman, <del>no</del> <add>there is no reason upon the whole why any</add> part of it aught<lb/>
to be borne by A.  <del>On the</del> For the damage which<lb/>
A. must have been put to in order to prevent the<lb/>
damage to S. is (taking probability into the account)<lb/>
exactly <del>equal</del> <add>equivalent</add> to the chance which S. had of being put<lb/>
to damage:  <del><hi rend="underline"></hi></del> 1<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> is exactly equal to 1/20 chance<lb/>
of 20<hi rend="superscript">s.</hi>  On the contrary as A's fortune is but half  what<lb/>
<add>S's</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

115)

CRIT. JUR. CRIM.

that is, that no case which by fear of the penalty he could be made to exert would
be sufficient to prevent it, there could be no reason
for charging him with the minutest part of it. In
We may go farther. There would be no reason for charging
him with any part of it, if the certain pain which it
would be of to him and to the generality of persons in
his situation to exert that case which would be requisite
to prevent the mischief damage would exceed the value
of the chance there is for the damage's happening to
S. Let us take an

Let us take an instance. S is the owner of a
Coach. A. of a Waggon. The fortune of S. is double
to that of A. They are travelling the same road to the same
place Town. They come to a place where the road
divides into two, both leading however to the Town.
By road The right hand road is the only one which a Coach can take. It is better for a single carriage than the
left: but such is the narrowness of it, that there the
chance is as 1 to 20 that if they travel together
the Coach by jostling against the Waggon will sustain
a damage to the amount of 20s. On the other
hand if the Waggon takes the left hand road
there will be no such hazard. But the Waggon must
at all events pay a toll of 1s.

Now I say that in this case supposing the damage
to happen, the management of the two carriages having
been left entirely to the Coachman, no there is no reason upon the whole why any part of it aught
to be borne by A. On the For the damage which
A. must have been put to in order to prevent the
damage to S. is (taking probability into the account)
exactly equal equivalent to the chance which S. had of being put
to damage: 1s is exactly equal to 1/20 chance
of 20s. On the contrary as A's fortune is but half what
S's


Identifier: | JB/159/266/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

266

Info in main headings field

crit. jur. crim

Image

003

Titles

punishment / compensation / example

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d113 / d114 / d115 / d116

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54089

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in